Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Simulating the Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution

  • C. Knick Harley (a1) and N.F.R. Crafts (a2)
Abstract

This study examines technical change, trade, economic structure, and growth during the British Industrial Revolution by means of computational general equilibrium (CGE) modeling. It rejects Peter Temin's contention that our “new view” of sectorally concentrated productivity growth is inconsistent with industrial export data. A CGE trade model with diminishing returns in agriculture and realistic assumptions about consumer demand shows that while technical change in cottons and iron were major spurs to exportation of those specific goods, the need for food imports also stimulated exports generally. Incorporating trade data thus enriches our “new view.”

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Robert C. Allen Tracking the Agricultural Revolution.“ Economic History Review 52, no. 2 (1999): 209–35.

Maxine Berg , and Pat Hudson . “Rehabilitating the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 45, no. 1 (1992): 2450.

N. F. R. Crafts , and C. Knick Harley . “Output Growth and the British Industrial Revolution: A Restatement of the Crafts-Harley View.“ Economic History Review 45, no. 4 (1992): 703–30.

Ralph. Davis English Foreign Trade, 1700–1774.” Economic History Review 15, no. 2 (1962): 285303.

Ralph. Davis The Industrial Revolution and British Overseas Trade. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1979.

Gene M. Grossman , and Ethanan Helpman . “Technology and Trade.” In Handbook of International Economics, vol. 3, edited by Gene M. Grossman and Kenneth Rogoff , 1279–337. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1995.

C. Knick. Harley The Antebellum American Tariff: Food Exports and Manufacturing.” Explorations in Economic History 29, no.4 (1992): 379400.

C. Knick. Harley Cotton Textile Prices and the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 51, no. 1 (1998): 4983.

Albert H. Imlah Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1958.

David S. Landes What Room for Accident in History? Explaining Big Changes by Small Events.” Economic History Review 47, no. 3 (1994): 637–56.

Jeffrey G. Williamson Debating the British Industrial Revolution.” Explorations in Economic History 24, no. 3 (1987): 269–92.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 77 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 567 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.