Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Factory Discipline

  • Gregory Clark (a1)
Abstract

Before the Industrial Revolution in Britain most workers controlled their pace, timing, and conduct at work. Factory discipline radically changed this. Employers now dictated how, when, and in what manner work was done. Why did discipline triumph? Was it required by the need to tightly coordinate workers with new technologies? Or was it successful because it coerced more effort from workers than they would freely give? The empirical evidence shows that discipline succeeded mainly by increasing work effort. Workers effectively hired capitalists to make them work harder. They lacked the self-control to achieve higher earnings on their own.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bensman, David, The Practice of Solidarity: American Hat Finishers in the Nineteenth Century (Urbana, IL, 1985).
Black, Clementina, Sweated Industry (London, 1907).
Booth, Charles, Life and Labour of the People in London, Vol. IV: The Trades of East London (London, 1893).
Burnett, Isabel, An Experimental Investigation into Repetitive Work, Medical Research Council, Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Report No. 30 (London, 1925).
Church, Roy A., Economic and Social Change in a Midland Town: Victorian Nottingham, 1815–1900 (London, 1966).
Church, Roy, The History of the British Coal Industry, vol. 3 (Oxford, 1986).
Clark, Gregory, “Why Isn≈t the Whole World Developed? Lessons from the Cotton Mills,” this Journal, 47 (03. 1987), 134–67.
Cooper, Patricia, Once a Cigar Maker: Men, Women, and Work Culture in American Cigar Factories, 1900–1919 (Urbana, IL, 1987).
Coyne, Franklin E., The Development of the Cooperage Industry (Chicago, 1940).
Drakard, David, and Holdway, Paul, Spode Printed Ware (London, 1983).
Fitton, R. S., and Wadsworth, A. P., The Strutts and the Arkwrights, 1758–1830: A Study of the Early Factory System (Manchester, 1958).
Kay, James Philip, Moral and Physical Conditions of the Working Classes Employed in the Cotton Manufacture in Manchester (London, 1832).
Lambert, W. R., “Drink and Work-Discipline in Industrial South Wales, c. 1800–1870,” Welsh History Review, 7 (1975).
Landes, David, “What Do Bosses Really Do?” this Journal, 46 (09. 1986), pp. 585624.
Lardner, Dionysius, The Steam Engine (7th edn., London, 1860).
Leach, James, Stubborn Facts from the Factories (London, 1844).
Lipson, E., A Short History of Wool and its Manufacture (London, 1953).
Mann, Julia de Lacy, The Cloth Industry in the West of England from 1640 to 1880 (Oxford, 1971).
Mantoux, Paul, The Industrial Revolution in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1928).
Marglin, Stephen, “What Do Bosses Do? The Origins and Function of Capitalist Hierarchy,” Review of Radical Political Economy, 6 (Summer 1974), pp. 60112.
Marx, Karl, Capital, Volume 1, Fowkes, Ben, trans. (New York, 1977).
Montgomery, James, The Cotton Manufacture of the United States Contrasted and Compared with that of Great Britain (Glasgow, 1840).
Pollard, Sidney, “Factory Discipline in the Industrial Revolution,” Economic History Review, 16 (12. 1963), pp. 254–71.
Pollard, Sidney, The Genesis of Modern Management (Cambridge, MA., 1965).
Prest, John, The Industrial Revolution in Coventry (Oxford, 1960).
Reid, Douglas, “The Decline of St. Monday,” Past and Present, 71 (05, 1976), pp. 76101.
Royle, Edward, Modern Britain: A Social History, 1750–1985 (London, 1987).
Smith, Richard Mudie, Sweated Industries (London, 1906).
Thaler, Richard H., and Shefrin, H. M., “An Economic Theory of Self-Control,” Journal of Political Economy, 89 (04. 1981), pp. 392406.
Thomas, John, The Rise of the Staffordshire Potteries (Bath, 1971).
Thompson, E. P., “Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism,” Past and Present, 38 (12 1963).
Ure, Andrew, The Cotton Manufacture of Great Britain (London, 1836).
Ure, Andrew, Dictionary of Arts, Manufactures, and Mines (11th American edn., New York, 1848).
Usher, Abbott Payson, An Introduction to the Industrial History of England (Boston, 1920).
Whipp, Richard, Patterns of Labour: Work and Social Change in the Pottery Industry (London, 1990).
Williamson, Oliver E., “The Organization of Work: A Comparative Institutional Assessment,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (03. 1980), pp. 538.
Wyatt, S., Variations in Efficiency in Cotton Weaving. Medical Research Council, Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Report No. 23 (London, 1923).
Wyatt, S. et al. , The Effects of Monotony in Work. Medical Research Council, Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Report No. 56 (London, 1929).
Wyatt, S. et al. , Incentives in Repetitive Work: A Practical Experiment in a Factory. Medical Research Council, Industrial Fatigue Research Board, Report No. 69 (London, 1934).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed