Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 32
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Saaritsa, Sakari and Kaihovaara, Antti 2016. Good for girls or bad for boys? Schooling, social inequality and intrahousehold allocation in early twentieth century Finland. Cliometrica, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 55.

    Hinde, Andrew 2015. Sex differentials in phthisis mortality in England and Wales, 1861–1870. The History of the Family, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 366.

    Sandström, Glenn and Vikström, Lotta 2015. Sex preference for children in German villages during the fertility transition. Population Studies, Vol. 69, Issue. 1, p. 57.

    Donrovich, Robyn Puschmann, Paul and Matthijs, Koen 2014. Rivalry, solidarity, and longevity among siblings. Demographic Research, Vol. 31, p. 1167.

    Li, Ting and Anderson, James 2013. Shaping human mortality patterns through intrinsic and extrinsic vitality processes. Demographic Research, Vol. 28, p. 341.

    Ory, Brett E. and Van Poppel, Frans W.A. 2013. Trends and risk factors of maternal mortality in late-nineteenth-century Netherlands. The History of the Family, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 481.

    Aldashev, Gani and Guirkinger, Catherine 2012. Deadly anchor: Gender bias under Russian colonization of Kazakhstan. Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 49, Issue. 4, p. 399.

    Bengtsson, Tommy and Dribe, Martin 2011. The late emergence of socioeconomic mortality differentials: A micro-level study of adult mortality in southern Sweden 1815–1968. Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 389.

    Bérenger, Valérie and Verdier‐Chouchane, Audrey 2011. From the Relative Women Disadvantage Index to Women’s Quality‐of‐Life. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 203.

    Lynch, Katherine A. 2011. Why weren't (many) European women ‘missing’?. The History of the Family, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 250.

    Abraham, Martin Auspurg, Katrin and Hinz, Thomas 2010. Migration Decisions Within Dual-Earner Partnerships: A Test of Bargaining Theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 72, Issue. 4, p. 876.

    ANDERSON, SIWAN and RAY, DEBRAJ 2010. Missing Women: Age and Disease. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 77, Issue. 4, p. 1262.

    Bengtsson, Tommy and Dribe, Martin 2010. Quantifying the Family Frailty Effect in Infant and Child Mortality by Using Median Hazard Ratio (MHR). Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 15.

    Cinnirella, Francesco 2008. On the road to industrialization: nutritional status in Saxony, 1690–1850. Cliometrica, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, p. 229.

    Harrell, C. Janna Smith, Ken R. and Mineau, Geraldine P. 2008. Are Girls Good and Boys Bad for Parental Longevity?. Human Nature, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 56.

    Harris, Bernard 2008.

    Bhaskar, V. and Gupta, B. 2007. India's missing girls: biology, customs, and economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 221.

    Klasen, Stephan 2007. Human Well-Being.

    Cuesta, José 2006. The distributive consequences ofmachismo: a simulation analysis of intra-household discrimination. Journal of International Development, Vol. 18, Issue. 8, p. 1065.

    Jones, James Holland and Ferguson, Brodie 2006. The marriage squeeze in Colombia, 1973–2005: The role of excess male death. Biodemography and Social Biology, Vol. 53, Issue. 3-4, p. 140.


Marriage, Bargaining, and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation: Excess Female Mortality among Adults during Early German Development, 1740–1860

  • Stephan Klasen (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2009

This article investigates sex-specific mortality rates in eighteenth- and nineteenthcentury rural Germany to determine whether there was any gender bias in the allocation of household resources. Family reconstitution data from 60 villages provide evidence of considerable excess female mortality among married adults. The empirical findings are consistent with a bargaining approach to understanding intrahousehold resource allocation and suggest that women's survival disadvantage is related to their positions in the remarriage market, the perceived value of their work, as well as differences in altruism. Agricultural change appears to be one factor responsible for the emergence of this disadvantage.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Robert Allen . Enclosure and the Yeoman. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Lincoln Chen Sex Bias in the Family Allocation of Food and Health Care in Rural Bangladesh”. Population and Development Review 7 (1981): 5570.

Ansley Coale . “Excess Female Mortality and the Balance of the Sexes”. Population and Development Review 17 (1991): 517–23.

Ansley Coale , Paul Demeny , and Barbara Vaughan . Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.

Angus Deaton . “Looking for Boy-Girl Discrimination in Household Expenditure Data”. World Bank Economic Review 3 (1989): 115.

Stephan Klasen Missing Women' Reconsidered”. World Development 22 (1994): 1061–71.

Stephan Klasen Nutrition, Health, and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is there a Gender Bias?Journal of Development Studies 32, No. 6 (1996): 913–32.

Irvine Loudon . Death in Childbirth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

Marilyn Manser , and Murray Brown . “Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis”. International Economic Review 21 (1980): 3144.

Elaine McCrate . “Trade, Merger, and Employment: Economic Theory on Marriage”. Review of Radical Political Economy 19 (1987): 7389.

Marjorie B. McElroy The Empirical Content of Nash-Bargained Household Behavior”. Journal of Human Resources 25 (1990): 559–83.

Marjorie B. McElroy , and Mary J. Homey . “Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of Demand”. International Economic Review 22 (1981): 333-49.

Josef Mooser . Ländliche Klassengesellschaft1770–1848. Gö;ttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1984.

J. Nash The Bargaining Problem”. Econometrica 18 (1950): 155–62.

Stephen Nicholas and Deborah Oxley . “The Living Standards of Women during the Industrial Revolution, 1795–1820”. Economic History Review 46 (1993): 723–49.

Samuel H. Preston Mortality Patterns in National Populations. New York: Academic Press, 1976.

Paul A. Samuelson Social Indifference Curves”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1956): 122.

Amartya K. Sen Women's Survival as a Development Problem”. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43 (1989): 1429.

Ken R. Smith , and Cathleen D. Zick . “Linked Lives, Dependent Demise? Survival Analysis of Husbands and Wives”. Demography 31 (1994): 113.

Keith Snell . “Agricultural Seasonal Unemployment, the Standard of Living and Women's Work in the South and East 1690–1860”. Economic History Review 34 (1981): 407–37.

Dominique Tabutin . “La Surmortalitéfeminine en Europe avant 1940”. Population 33 (1978): 121–48.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *