Hostname: page-component-6b88cc9666-cdmm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-14T08:25:52.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linear stability analysis of magnetoconvection in finite-sized systems: competition between spatial confinement and magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2026

Xin Tao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures and School of Aerospace, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, PR China
Xiaojue Zhu
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen 37077, Germany
Ming-Jiu Ni
Affiliation:
School of Engineering Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
Yi-Chao Xie*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures and School of Aerospace, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Yi-Chao Xie, yichao.xie@xjtu.edu.cn

Abstract

We present a linear stability analysis of two-dimensional magnetoconvection considering the effects of spatial confinement (characterised by the aspect ratio $\varGamma$) and magnetic field (characterised by the Hartmann number $\textit{Ha}_{i=x,y,z}$ with subscript representing its direction). It is found that when the magnetic field is perpendicular to the convection domain ($y$-direction), it does not affect the onset of convection due to zero Lorentz force. With a magnetic field in the $z$ (vertical) or $x$ (horizontal) directions, the onset of convection is delayed, resulting in a larger critical Rayleigh number $Ra_c$ for the onset of convection. We outline phase diagrams showing the dominating factors determining $Ra_c$. When $\varGamma \leqslant 0.83\textit{Ha}_z^{-0.5}$ for vertical and $\varGamma \leqslant 0.66\textit{Ha}_x^{-1.01}$ for horizontal magnetic field, $Ra_c$ is mainly determined by the geometrical confinement with $Ra_c=502\varGamma ^{-4.0}$. When $\varGamma \geqslant 2^{1/6}\pi ^{1/3}\textit{Ha}_z^{-1/3}$ for vertical and $\varGamma \geqslant 5$ for the horizontal magnetic field, $Ra_c$ is mainly determined by the magnetic field with $Ra_c=\pi ^2\textit{Ha}^2$. In the intermediate regime, both the magnetic field and spatial confinement determine $Ra_c$, and a horizontal magnetic field is found to suppress convection more than a vertical magnetic field. In addition, under a horizontal magnetic field, there exists a subregime characterised by $Ra_c = 9.9\,\varGamma ^{-2.0} \textit{Ha}_x^2$, which is explained by a theoretical model. The magnetic field also modifies the length scale $\ell$. For a vertical magnetic field, $\ell$ decreases with increasing $\textit{Ha}_z$, following $\ell =2^{1/6}\pi ^{1/3}\textit{Ha}^{-1/3}$. For a horizontal magnetic field, when $\varGamma \lt 0.62\textit{Ha}_x^{0.47}$, the flow is a single-roll structure with $\ell$ being the width of the domain. The study thus shed new light on the interplay between magnetic field and spatial confinement.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aggarwal, A., Aurnou, J.M. & Horn, S. 2022 Magnetic damping of jet flows in quasi-two-dimensional Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. E 106 (4), 045104.10.1103/PhysRevE.106.045104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahlers, G., et al. 2022 Aspect ratio dependence of heat transfer in a cylindrical Rayleigh–Bénard cell. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (8), 084501.10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.084501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlers, G., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2009 Heat transfer and large scale dynamics in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2), 503537.10.1103/RevModPhys.81.503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhmedagaev, R., Zikanov, O., Krasnov, D. & Schumacher, J. 2020 Turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a strong vertical magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 895, R4.10.1017/jfm.2020.336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aurnou, J.M. & Olson, P.L. 2001 Experiments on Rayleigh–Bénard convection, magnetoconvection and rotating magnetoconvection in liquid gallium. J. Fluid Mech. 430, 283307.10.1017/S0022112000002950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, S.H. & Zhu, X. 2023 Scaling relations in quasi-static magnetoconvection with a strong vertical magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 976, A4.10.1017/jfm.2023.902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boussinesq, J. 1903 Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur. Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Buell, J.C. & Catton, I. 1983 The effect of wall conduction on the stability of a fluid in a right circular cylinder heated from below. J. Heat Transfer 105 (2), 255260.10.1115/1.3245571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, U. & Müller, U. 2001 Rayleigh–Bénard convection in liquid metal layers under the influence of a vertical magnetic field. Phys. Fluids 13 (11), 32473257.10.1063/1.1404385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1952 XLVI. On the inhibition of convection by a magnetic field. Phil. Mag. 43 (340), 501532.10.1080/14786440508520205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Wang, Z.-B. & Ni, M.-J. 2024 a Effects of horizontal magnetic fields on turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a cuboid vessel with aspect ratio $\gamma = 5$ . J. Fluid Mech. 980, A24.10.1017/jfm.2024.52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X.-Y., Yang, J.-C. & Ni, M.-J. 2024 b Effects of horizontal magnetic fields on flow morphologies and global transports in liquid metal thermal convection. J. Fluid Mech. 1000, A59.10.1017/jfm.2024.1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chillà, F. & Schumacher, J. 2012 New perspectives in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 125.10.1140/epje/i2012-12058-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chong, K.L., Ding, G.-Y. & Xia, K.-Q. 2018 Multiple-resolution scheme in finite-volume code for active or passive scalar turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 375, 10451058.10.1016/j.jcp.2018.09.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cioni, S., Chaumat, S. & Sommeria, J. 2000 Effect of a vertical magnetic field on turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. E 62 (4), R4520.10.1103/PhysRevE.62.R4520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grannan, A.M., Cheng, J.S., Aggarwal, A., Hawkins, E.K., Xu, Y., Horn, S., Sánchez-Álvarez, J., Aurnou, J.M. 2022 Experimental pub crawl from Rayleigh–Bénard to magnetostrophic convection. J. Fluid Mech. 939, R1.10.1017/jfm.2022.204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jirlow, K. 1956 Experimental investigation of the inhibition of convection by a magnetic field. Tellus 8 (2), 252253.10.3402/tellusa.v8i2.8957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, D.H. & Weier, T. 2018 Fluid mechanics of liquid metal batteries. Appl. Mech. Rev. 70 (2), 020801.10.1115/1.4038699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobloch, E., Weiss, N.O. & Da Costa, L.N. 1981 Oscillatory and steady convection in a magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 153186.10.1017/S0022112081003443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraichnan, R.H. 1962 Turbulent thermal convection at arbitrary Prandtl number. Phys. Fluids 5 (11), 13741389.10.1063/1.1706533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Z.L., Chong, K.L., Ding, G.-Y. & Xia, K.-Q. 2019 Quasistatic magnetoconvection: heat transport enhancement and boundary layer crossing. J. Fluid Mech. 870, 519542.10.1017/jfm.2019.232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W., Krasnov, D. & Schumacher, J. 2018 Wall modes in magnetoconvection at high Hartmann numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 849, R2.10.1017/jfm.2018.479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, D. & Shishkina, O. 2024 Ultimate Rayleigh–Bénard turbulence. Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (3), 035001.10.1103/RevModPhys.96.035001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, D. & Xia, K.-Q. 2010 Small-scale properties of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42 (1), 335364.10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormack, M., Teimurazov, A., Shishkina, O. & Linkmann, M. 2023 Wall mode dynamics and transition to chaos in magnetoconvection with a vertical magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 975, R2.10.1017/jfm.2023.863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, R. 1990 Magnetohydrodynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-7883-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. 1955 An experiment on the inhibition of thermal convection by a magnetic field. Nature 175 (4453), 417419.10.1038/175417b0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberbeck, A. 1879 Ueber die wärmeleitung der flüssigkeiten bei berücksichtigung der strömungen infolge von temperaturdifferenzen. Ann. Phys. 243 (6), 271292.10.1002/andp.18792430606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, A., Scheel, J.D. & Schumacher, J. 2018 Turbulent superstructures in Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 2118.10.1038/s41467-018-04478-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proctor, M.R.E. & Weiss, N.O. 1982 Magnetoconvection. Rep. Prog. Phys. 45 (11), 1317.10.1088/0034-4885/45/11/003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, W.H. & Harris, D.L. 1958 Some further results on the Bénard problem. Phys. Fluids 1 (2), 102110.10.1063/1.1705871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, L., Tao, X., Xia, K.-Q. & Xie, Y.-C. 2024 a Transition to fully developed turbulence in liquid-metal convection facilitated by spatial confinement. J. Fluid Mech. 981, R2.10.1017/jfm.2024.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, L., Tao, X., Zhang, L., Xia, K.-Q. & Xie, Y.-C. 2024 b Heat transport in liquid metal convection from onset to turbulence: the effect of small aspect ratio. J. Fluid Mech. 993, R3.10.1017/jfm.2024.630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, P.E., Gauthier, F., Kaiser, R. & Salort, J. 2010 On the triggering of the ultimate regime of convection. New J. Phys. 12 (8), 085014.10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/085014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salavy, J.F., Boccaccini, L.V., Lässer, R., Meyder, R., Neuberger, H., Poitevin, Y., Rampal, G., Rigal, E., Zmitko, M. & Aiello, A. 2007 Overview of the last progresses for the European test blanket modules projects. Fusion Engng Des. 82 (15), 21052112.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.02.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishkina, O. 2021 Rayleigh–Bénard convection: the container shape matters. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (9), 090502.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.090502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R.J.A.M., Blass, A., Zhu, X., Verzicco, R. & Lohse, D. 2018 Turbulent thermal superstructures in Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (4), 041501.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.041501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R.J.A.M., Hartmann, R., Verzicco, R. & Lohse, D. 2024 How wide must Rayleigh–Bénard cells be to prevent finite aspect ratio effects in turbulent flow? J. Fluid Mech. 1000, A58.10.1017/jfm.2024.996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasaka, Y., Igaki, K., Yanagisawa, T., Vogt, T., Zuerner, T. & Eckert, S. 2016 Regular flow reversals in Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a horizontal magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 93 (4), 043109.10.1103/PhysRevE.93.043109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teimurazov, A., McCormack, M., Linkmann, M. & Shishkina, O. 2024 Unifying heat transport model for the transition between buoyancy-dominated and Lorentz-force-dominated regimes in quasistatic magnetoconvection. J. Fluid Mech. 980, R3.10.1017/jfm.2024.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, T., Ishimi, W., Yanagisawa, T., Tasaka, Y., Sakuraba, A. & Eckert, S. 2018 Transition between quasi-two-dimensional and three-dimensional Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a horizontal magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (1), 013503.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.013503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, K., Chen, L. & Ni, M.-J. 2025 Flow and heat transfer mechanism of wall mode in Rayleigh–Bénard convection under strong magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Fluids 10 (3), 033702.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.10.033702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, K.-Q. 2013 Current trends and future directions in turbulent thermal convection. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 3 (5), 052001.10.1063/2.1305201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, K.-Q., Huang, S.-D., Xie, Y.-C. & Zhang, L. 2023 Tuning heat transport via coherent structure manipulation: recent advances in thermal turbulence. Nat. Sci. Rev. 10 (6), nwad012.10.1093/nsr/nwad012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Y., Horn, S. & Aurnou, J.M. 2023 Transition from wall modes to multimodality in liquid gallium magnetoconvection. Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 (10), 103503.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.8.103503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, M., Calkins, M.A., Maffei, S., Julien, K., Tobias, S.M. & Marti, P. 2019 Heat transfer and flow regimes in quasi-static magnetoconvection with a vertical magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 877, 11861206.10.1017/jfm.2019.615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagisawa, T., Hamano, Y., Miyagoshi, T., Yamagishi, Y., Tasaka, Y. & Takeda, Y. 2013 Convection patterns in a liquid metal under an imposed horizontal magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 88 (6), 063020.10.1103/PhysRevE.88.063020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagisawa, T., Yamagishi, Y., Hamano, Y., Tasaka, Y., Yoshida, M., Yano, K. & Takeda, Y. 2010 Structure of large-scale flows and their oscillation in the thermal convection of liquid gallium. Phys. Rev. E 82 (1), 016320.10.1103/PhysRevE.82.016320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J.C., Vogt, T. & Eckert, S. 2021 Transition from steady to oscillating convection rolls in Rayleigh–Bénard convection under the influence of a horizontal magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Fluids 6 (2), 023502.10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.023502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J., Goldfaden, A., Flagstad, M. & Scheel, J.D. 2017 Onset of Rayleigh–Bénard convection for intermediate aspect ratio cylindrical containers. Phys. Fluids 29 (2), 024107.10.1063/1.4976543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, X.-X., Zhang, J. & Ni, M.-J. 2018 Numerical simulation of the Rayleigh–Bénard convection under the influence of magnetic fields. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 120, 11181131.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.11.151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L. & Xia, K.-Q. 2023 Heat transfer in a quasi-one-dimensional Rayleigh–Bénard convection cell. J. Fluid Mech. 973, R5.10.1017/jfm.2023.600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürner, T., Schindler, F., Vogt, T., Eckert, S. & Schumacher, J. 2020 Flow regimes of Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a vertical magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. 894, A21.10.1017/jfm.2020.264CrossRefGoogle Scholar