Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Revisiting the law of the wake in wall turbulence

  • Dominik Krug (a1), Jimmy Philip (a1) and Ivan Marusic (a1)
Abstract

The streamwise mean velocity profile in a turbulent boundary layer is classically described as the sum of a log law extending all the way to the edge of the boundary layer and a wake function. While there is theoretical support for the log law, the wake function, defined as the deviation of the measured velocity profile from the log law, is essentially an empirical fit and has no real physical underpinning. Here, we present a new physically motivated formulation of the velocity profile in the outer region, and hence for the wake function. In our approach, the entire flow is represented by a two-state model consisting of an inertial self-similar region designated as ‘pure wall flow state’ (featuring a log-law velocity distribution) and a free stream state, which results in a jump in velocity at the interface separating the two. We show that the model provides excellent agreement with the available high Reynolds number mean velocity profiles if this interface is assumed to fluctuate randomly about a mean position with a Gaussian distribution. The new concept can also be extended to internal geometries in the same form, again confirmed by the data. Furthermore, adopting the same interface distribution in a two-state model for the streamwise turbulent intensities, with unchanged parameters, also yields a reliable and consistent prediction for the decline in the outer region of these profiles in all geometries considered. Finally, we discuss differences between our model interface and the turbulent/non-turbulent interface (TNTI) in turbulent boundary layers. We physically interpret the two-state model as lumping the effects of internal shear layers and the TNTI into a single discontinuity at the interface.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: dominik.krug@unimelb.edu.au
References
Hide All
R. J. Adrian , C. D. Meinhart  & C. D. Tomkins 2000 Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 154.

K. A. Chauhan , P. A. Monkewitz  & H. M. Nagib 2009 Criteria for assessing experiments in zero pressure gradient boundary layers. Fluid Dyn. Res. 41 (2), 021404.

K. A. Chauhan  & H. M. Nagib 2008 On the development of wall-bounded turbulent flows. In IUTAM Symposium on Computational Physics and New Perspectives in Turbulence, pp. 183189. Springer.

K. Chauhan , J. Philip  & I. Marusic 2014a Scaling of the turbulent/non-turbulent interface in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 751, 298328.

K. Chauhan , J. Philip , C. M. de Silva , N. Hutchins  & I. Marusic 2014b The turbulent/non-turbulent interface and entrainment in a boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 742, 119151.

D. Coles 1956 The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1 (02), 191226.

R. B. Dean 1978 Reynolds number dependence of skin friction and other bulk flow variables in two-dimensional rectangular duct flow. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 100 (2), 215223.

J. Eisma , J. Westerweel , G. Ooms  & G. E. Elsinga 2015 Interfaces and internal layers in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 27 (5), 055103.

N. Furuichi , Y. Terao , Y. Wada  & Y. Tsuji 2015 Friction factor and mean velocity profile for pipe flow at high Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 27 (9), 095108.

P. S. Granville 1976 A modified law of the wake for turbulent shear layers. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 98 (3), 578580.

M. Hultmark 2012 A theory for the streamwise turbulent fluctuations in high Reynolds number pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 707, 575584.

M. Hultmark , M. Vallikivi , S. C. C. Bailey  & A. J. Smits 2012 Turbulent pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (9), 094501.

T. Ishihara , Y. Kaneda  & J. C. R. Hunt 2013 Thin shear layers in high Reynolds number turbulence – DNS results. Flow Turbul. Combust. 91 (4), 895929.

Y. S. Kwon , N. Hutchins  & J. P. Monty 2016 On the use of the Reynolds decomposition in the intermittent region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 794, 516.

Y. S. Kwon , J. Philip , C. M. de Silva , N. Hutchins  & J. P. Monty 2014 The quiescent core of turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 751, 228254.

I. Marusic , K. A. Chauhan , V. Kulandaivelu  & N. Hutchins 2015 Evolution of zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers from different tripping conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 783, 379411.

I. Marusic , J. P. Monty , M. Hultmark  & A. J. Smits 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.

P. A. Monkewitz , K. A. Chauhan  & H. M. Nagib 2007 Self-consistent high-reynolds-number asymptotics for zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 19 (11), 115101.

P. A. Monkewitz  & H. M. Nagib 2015 Large-Reynolds-number asymptotics of the streamwise normal stress in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 783, 474503.

J. P. Monty , N. Hutchins , H. C. H. Ng , I. Marusic  & M. S. Chong 2009 A comparison of turbulent pipe, channel and boundary layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 431442.

H. M. Nagib  & K. A. Chauhan 2008 Variations of von Kármán coefficient in canonical flows. Phys. Fluids 20 (10), 1518.

M. P. Schultz  & K. A. Flack 2013 Reynolds-number scaling of turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 25 (2), 025104.

C. M. de Silva , N. Hutchins  & I. Marusic 2016 Uniform momentum zones in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 786, 309331.

D. T. Squire , C. Morrill-Winter , N. Hutchins , M. P. Schultz , J. C. Klewicki  & I. Marusic 2016 Comparison of turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough surfaces up to high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 795, 210240.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 309 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 486 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th December 2016 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.