Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:13:54.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slipping free jet flow near channel exit at moderate Reynolds number for large slip length

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2016

Roger E. Khayat*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B9
*
Email address for correspondence: rkhayat@uwo.ca

Abstract

The flow of a slipping fluid jet is examined theoretically as it emerges from a channel at moderate Reynolds number. The ratio of the slip length to the channel width $S$ is assumed to be of order one, one order of magnitude larger than the perturbation parameter ${\it\varepsilon}=Re^{-1/2}$, $Re$ being the Reynolds number. Poiseuille flow conditions are assumed to prevail far upstream from the exit. The problem is solved using the method of matched asymptotic expansions. A similarity solution is obtained in the inner layer of the free surface, with the outer layer extending to the jet centreline. The inner-layer thickness grows like $\sqrt{x/Re\,S}$. A slipping jet is found to contract like $x/Re$ very near and far from the channel exit, but does not have a definite behaviour in between compared to $(x/Re)^{1/3}$ for an adhering jet, $x$ being the distance from the channel exit. Eventually, the jet reaches uniform conditions far downstream. As in the case of entry flow, there is a rapid departure in flow behaviour for a slipping jet from the $S=0$ limit. This rapid change is notably observed in the drop of boundary-layer thickness, increase in exit and relaxation lengths as well as in jet width with slip length. Finally, the connections with microchannel and hydrophobic flows are highlighted.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowles, R. I. & Smith, F. T. 1992 The standing hydraulic jump: theory, computations and comparisons with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 145.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1965 On similarity solutions of the boundary-layer equations with algebraic decay. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 673.Google Scholar
Bush, J. W. M. & Aristoff, J. M. 2003 The influence of surface tension on the circular hydraulic jump. J. Fluid Mech. 489, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, S. & Anand, K. D. 2008 Implications of hydrophobic interactions and consequent apparent slip phenomenon on the entrance region transport of liquids through microchannels. Phys. Fluids 20, 043602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, C. & Kim, C. J. 2006 Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 066001.Google Scholar
Choi, C., Westin, J. A. & Breuer, K. S. 2003 Apparent slip flows in hydrophilic and hydrophobic microchannels. Phys. Fluids 15, 2897.Google Scholar
Denier, J. P. & Hewitt, R. E. 2004 Asymptotic matching constraints for a boundary-layer flow of a power-law fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 518, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, Z. & Muzychka, S. 2010 Slip flow in the hydrodynamic entrance region of circular and noncircular microchannels. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 132, 011201.Google Scholar
Granick, S., Zhu, Y. & Lee, H. 2003 Slippery questions about complex fluids flowing past solids. Nat. Mater. 2, 221.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. 1960 Lectures in Fluid Mechanics. Interscience.Google Scholar
Goren, S. L. & Wronski, S. 1966 The shape of low-speed capillary jets of Newtonian liquids. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khayat, R. E. 2014 Free-surface jet flow of a shear-thinning power-law fluid near the channel exit. J. Fluid Mech. 748, 580.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. & Brenner, M. P. 2004 Dynamic mechanisms for apparent slip on hydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 70, 026311.Google Scholar
Lauga, E., Brenner, M. P. & Stone, H. A. 2005 Microfluidics: the no-slip boundary condition. In Handbook of Experimental Fluid Dynamics (ed. Foss, J., Tropea, C. & Yarin, A.), chap. 15. Springer.Google Scholar
Miyake, Y., Yukai, E. & Iemoto, Y. 1979 On a two-dimensional laminar liquid jet. Bullt. Japan Soc. Mech. Engng 22, 1382.Google Scholar
Neto, C., Evans, D. R., Bonaccurso, E., Butt, H.-J. & Craig, V. S. J. 2005 Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: a review of experimental studies. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 2859.Google Scholar
Omodei, B. J. 1979 Computer solutions of a plane Newtonian jet with surface tension. Comput. Fluids 7, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ou, J. & Rothstein, J. P. 2005 Direct velocity measurements of the flow past drag-reducing ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 17, 103606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phares, D. J., Smedley, G. T. & Flagan, R. C. 2000 The wall shear stress produced by the normal impingement of a jet on a flat surface. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 351.Google Scholar
Philippe, C. & Dumargue, P. 1991 Étude de l’établissement d’un jet liquide laminaire émergeant d’une conduite cylindrique verticale semi-infinie et soumis à I l’influence de la gravité. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 42, 227.Google Scholar
Poole, R. J. & Ridley, B. S. 2007 Development-length requirements for fully developed laminar pipe flow of inelastic non-Newtonian liquids. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 129, 1281.Google Scholar
Rothstein, J. P. 2010 Slip on superhydrophobic surfaces. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 89.Google Scholar
Ruschak, K. J. & Scriven, L. E. 1977 Developing flow on a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 305.Google Scholar
Saffari, A. & Khayat, R. E. 2009 Flow of viscoelastic jet with moderate inertia near channel exit. J. Fluid Mech. 639, 65.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1976a Flow through constricted or dilated pipes and channels: Part 1. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 29, 343.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1976b Flow through constricted or dilated pipes and channels: Part 2. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 29, 365.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1979 The separating flow through a severely constricted symmetric tube. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 725.Google Scholar
Sobey, I. J. 2005 Interactive Boundary Layer Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tillett, J. P. K. 1968 On the laminar flow in a free jet of liquid at high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 273.Google Scholar
Tretheway, D. C. & Meinhart, C. D. 2004 Agenerating mechanism for apparent fluid slip in hydrophobic microchannels. Phys. Fluids 16, 1509.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. D. 1975 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Parabolic.Google Scholar
Weinstein, S. J. & Ruschak, K. J. 2004 Coating flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 29.Google Scholar
Weinstein, S. J., Ruschak, K. J. & Ng, K. C. 2003 Developing flow of a power-law liquid film on an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 15, 2973.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E. 1986 A similarity solution for axisymmetric viscous-gravity jet. Phys. Fluids 29 (3), 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. & Thompson, M. C. 1996 Non-Newtonian shear-thinning flows past a flat plate. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 66, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J. & Khayat, R. E. 2008 Spread of a non-Newtonian liquid jet over a horizontal plate. J. Fluid Mech. 613, 411.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. & Granick, S. 2002 Limits of the hydrodynamics no-slip boundary condition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 106102.Google Scholar