Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Stall onset on aerofoils at low to moderately high Reynolds number flows

  • Wallace J. Morris (a1) and Zvi Rusak (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The inception of leading-edge stall on stationary, two-dimensional, smooth, thin aerofoils at low to moderately high chord Reynolds number flows is investigated by a reduced-order, multiscale model problem via numerical simulations. The asymptotic theory demonstrates that a subsonic flow about a thin aerofoil can be described in terms of an outer region, around most of the aerofoil’s chord, and an inner region, around the nose, that asymptotically match each other. The flow in the outer region is dominated by the classical thin aerofoil theory. Scaled (magnified) coordinates and a modified (smaller) Reynolds number $(R{e}_{M} )$ are used to correctly account for the nonlinear behaviour and extreme velocity changes in the inner region, where both the near-stagnation and high suction areas occur. It results in a model problem of a uniform, incompressible and viscous flow past a semi-infinite parabola with a far-field circulation governed by a parameter $\tilde {A} $ that is related to the aerofoil’s angle of attack, nose radius of curvature, thickness ratio, and camber. The model flow problem is solved for various values of $\tilde {A} $ through numerical simulations based on the unsteady Navier–Stokes equations. The value ${\tilde {A} }_{s} $ where a global separation zone first erupts in the nose flow, accompanied by loss of peak streamwise velocity ahead of it and change in shedding frequency behind it, is determined as a function of $R{e}_{M} $ . These values indicate the stall onset on the aerofoil at various flow conditions. It is found that ${\tilde {A} }_{s} $ decreases with $R{e}_{M} $ until some limit $R{e}_{M} $ ( ${\sim }300$ ) and then increases with further increase of Reynolds number. At low values of $R{e}_{M} $ the flow is laminar and steady, even when stall occurs. The flow in this regime is dominated by the increasing effect of the adverse pressure gradient, which eventually overcomes the ability of the viscous stress to keep the boundary layer attached to the aerofoil. The change in the nature of stall at the limit $R{e}_{M} $ is attributed to the appearance of downstream travelling waves in the boundary layer that shed from the marginal separation zone and grow in size with either $\tilde {A} $ or $R{e}_{M} $ . These unsteady, convective vortical structures relax the effect of the adverse pressure gradient on the viscous boundary layer to delay the onset of stall in the mean flow to higher values of ${\tilde {A} }_{s} $ . Computed results show agreement with marginal separation theory at low $R{e}_{M} $ and with available experimental data at higher $R{e}_{M} $ . This simplified approach provides a universal criterion to determine the stall angle of stationary thin aerofoils with a parabolic nose.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: rusakz@rpi.edu
References
Hide All
AbbottI. H. & von DoenhoffA. E. 1958 Theory of Wing Sections, 2nd edn. Dover.
AndersonJ. D. Jr 2007 Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill.
BatchelorG. K 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
BhaskaranR. & RothmayerA. P. 1998 Separation and instabilities in the viscous flow over airfoil leading edges. Comput. Fluids 27 (8), 903921.
CarrL. W. 1988 Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall. J. Aircraft 25 (1), 617.
CebeciT., KhattabA. K. & StewartsonK. 1980 On nose separation. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 435454.
ChengH. K. & SmithF. T. 1982 The influence of airfoil thickness and Reynolds number on separation. J. Appl. Math. Phys. (Z. Angew. Math. Phys.) 33, 151180.
van DommelenL. L. & ShenS. F. 1980 The spontaneous generation of the singularity in a separating laminar boundary layer. J. Comput. Phys. 38 (2), 125140.
ElliottJ. W. & SmithF. T. 1987 Dynamic stall due to unsteady marginal separation. J. Fluid Mech. 179, 489512.
GaultD. E. 1957 A correlation of low-speed, airfoil-section stalling characteristics with Reynolds number and airfoil geometry. NACA TN 3963.
GroveD. V., LaiosaJ. P., WoodsonS. H. & StookesberryD. C. 2002 Computational fluid dynamics study of an abrupt wing stall phenomena on the F/A-18E. AIAA Paper 2002-1025.
HoffmannK. A. & ChiangS. T. 1993 Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers. Engineering Education System.
JacobsE. N. & ShermanA. 1937 Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number. NACA Report 586.
JonesB. M. 1934 Stalling. J. R. Aero Soc. 38, 753770.
KunzP. J. & KrooI. 2001 Analysis and design of airfoils for use at ultra-low Reynolds numbers. In Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications (ed. Muller T. J.), Prog. in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 195, AIAA.
LiebeckR. H. 1973 A class of airfoils designed for high lift in incompressible flow. J. Aircraft 10 (10), 610617.
McCormickB. W. 1995 Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley.
MorrisW. J.II 2009 A universal prediction of stall onset for airfoils over a wide range of Reynolds number flows. PhD thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
NakayamaY. 1988 Visualized Flow. Pergamon.
PavelkaJ. & TatumK. 1981 Validation of a wing leading-edge stall prediction technique. J. Aircraft 18 (10), 849854.
PinierJ. T., AusseurJ. M., GlauserM. N. & HiguchiH. 2007 Proportional closed-loop feedback control of flow separation. AIAA J. 45 (1), 181190.
RoacheP. J. 1998 Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics. Hermosa.
RubanA. I. 1982 Asymptotic theory of short separation bubbles at the leading edge of a thin airfoil. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza (1), 4252.
RusakZ. 1994 Subsonic flow around the leading edge of a thin aerofoil with a parabolic nose. Eur. J. Appl. Maths 5, 283311.
RusakZ. & MorrisW. J.II 2011 Stall onset on airfoils at moderately high to high Reynolds number flows. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 133 (11), 111104.
SeligM. S., LyonC. A., GiguereP., NinhamC. P. & GuglielmoJ. J. 1996 Summary of low-speed airfoil data, vol. 2. Department of Aero. & Astro. Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
SousaE. 2003 The controversial stability analysis. Appl. Maths Comput. 145 (2/3), 777794.
StewartsonK., SmithF. T. & KaupsK. 1982 Marginal separation. Stud. Appl. Maths 67 (1), 4561.
SychevV. V., RubanA. I., SychevV. V. & KorolevG. L. 1998 Asymptotic Theory of Separated Flows. Cambridge University Press.
TaniI. 1964 Low speed flows involving bubble separations. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 5, 70103.
ThompsonH. D., WebbB. W. & HoffmanJ. D. 1985 The cell Reynolds number myth. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 5, 305310.
WebsterB. E., ShephardM. S., RusakZ. & FlahertyJ. E. 1994 Automated adaptive time-discontinuous finite-element method for unsteady compressible aerofoil aerodynamics. AIAA J. 32 (4), 748757.
WerleM. J. & DavisR. T. 1972 Incompressible laminar boundary layers on a parabola at angle of attack: a study of the separation point. Trans. ASME: J. Appl. Mech. 39 (1), 712.
YenS. C. & HuangL.-C. 2009 Flow patterns and aerodynamic performance of unswept and swept-back wings. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 131 (11)111101.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 42 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2339 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.