Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 204
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cecere, D. Giacomazzi, E. Arcidiacono, N.M. and Picchia, F.R. 2016. Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent lean premixed CH4/H2–Air slot flame. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 165, p. 384.


    Chakraborty, Nilanjan Konstantinou, Ilias and Lipatnikov, Andrei 2016. Effects of Lewis number on vorticity and enstrophy transport in turbulent premixed flames. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 015109.


    Gao, Yuan and Chakraborty, Nilanjan 2016. Modeling of Lewis number dependence of scalar dissipation rate transport for Large Eddy Simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, Vol. 69, Issue. 11, p. 1201.


    Karami, Shahram Hawkes, Evatt R. Talei, Mohsen and Chen, Jacqueline H. 2016. Edge flame structure in a turbulent lifted flame: A direct numerical simulation study. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 169, p. 110.


    Klein, Markus Chakraborty, Nilanjan and Gao, Yuan 2016. Scale similarity based models and their application to subgrid scale scalar flux modelling in the context of turbulent premixed flames. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 57, p. 91.


    Lai, Jiawei and Chakraborty, Nilanjan 2016. Statistical Behavior of Scalar Dissipation Rate in Head-On Quenching of Turbulent Premixed Flames: A Direct Numerical Simulation Analysis. Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 188, Issue. 2, p. 250.


    Lai, Jiawei and Chakraborty, Nilanjan 2016. Effects of Lewis Number on Head on Quenching of Turbulent Premixed Flames: A Direct Numerical Simulation Analysis. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 96, Issue. 2, p. 279.


    Ranjan, R. Muralidharan, B. Nagaoka, Y. and Menon, S. 2016. Subgrid-Scale Modeling of Reaction-Diffusion and Scalar Transport in Turbulent Premixed Flames. Combustion Science and Technology,


    Sabelnikov, V. A. Lipatnikov, A. N. Chakraborty, N. Nishiki, S. and Hasegawa, T. 2016. A transport equation for reaction rate in turbulent flows. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 28, Issue. 8, p. 081701.


    Uranakara, Harshavardhana A. Chaudhuri, Swetaprovo Dave, Himanshu L. Arias, Paul G. and Im, Hong G. 2016. A flame particle tracking analysis of turbulence–chemistry interaction in hydrogen–air premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 163, p. 220.


    Amato, Alberto Day, Marcus Cheng, Robert K. Bell, John Dasgupta, Debolina and Lieuwen, Tim 2015. Topology and burning rates of turbulent, lean, H2/air flames. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 162, Issue. 12, p. 4553.


    Gao, Y. Chakraborty, N. and Swaminathan, N. 2015. Dynamic Closure of Scalar Dissipation Rate for Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Premixed Combustion: A Direct Numerical Simulations Analysis. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 95, Issue. 4, p. 775.


    Gao, Yuan Chakraborty, Nilanjan and Klein, Markus 2015. Assessment of the performances of sub-grid scalar flux models for premixed flames with different global Lewis numbers: A Direct Numerical Simulation analysis. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 52, p. 28.


    Lipatnikov, A. N. Sabelnikov, V. A. Nishiki, S. Hasegawa, T. and Chakraborty, N. 2015. DNS Assessment of a Simple Model for Evaluating Velocity Conditioned to Unburned Gas in Premixed Turbulent Flames. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 94, Issue. 3, p. 513.


    Tamadonfar, Parsa and Gülder, Ömer L. 2015. Effects of mixture composition and turbulence intensity on flame front structure and burning velocities of premixed turbulent hydrocarbon/air Bunsen flames. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 162, Issue. 12, p. 4417.


    Yu, S. and Navarro-Martinez, S. 2015. Modelling of deflagration to detonation transition using flame thickening. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 1955.


    Chakraborty, Nilanjan 2014. Statistics of vorticity alignment with local strain rates in turbulent premixed flames. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, Vol. 46, p. 201.


    Chakraborty, Nilanjan Wang, Lipo and Klein, Markus 2014. Streamline segment statistics of premixed flames with nonunity Lewis numbers. Physical Review E, Vol. 89, Issue. 3,


    Gao, Y. Chakraborty, N. and Swaminathan, N. 2014. Scalar Dissipation Rate Transport in the Context of Large Eddy Simulations for Turbulent Premixed Flames with Non-Unity Lewis Number. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 93, Issue. 3, p. 461.


    Gao, Y. Chakraborty, N. and Swaminathan, N. 2014. Algebraic Closure of Scalar Dissipation Rate for Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Premixed Combustion. Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 186, Issue. 10-11, p. 1309.


    ×
  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Volume 278
  • November 1994, pp. 1-31

The evolution equation for the flame surface density in turbulent premixed combustion

  • Arnaud Trouvé (a1) (a2) and Thierry Poinsot (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022112094003599
  • Published online: 01 April 2006
Abstract

One basic effect of turbulence in turbulent premixed combustion is for the fluctuating velocity field to wrinkle the flame and greatly increase its surface area. In the flamelet theory, this effect is described by the flame surface density. An exact evolution equation for the flame surface density, called the Σ-equation, may be written, where basic physical mechanisms like production by hydrodynamic straining and destruction by propagation effects are described explicitly. Direct numerical simulation (DNS) is used in this paper to estimate the different terms appearing in the Σ-equation. The numerical configuration corresponds to three-dimensional premixed flames in isotropic turbulent flow. The simulations are performed for various mixture Lewis numbers in order to modify the strength and nature of the flame-flow coupling. The DNS-based analysis provides much information relevant to flamelet models. In particular, the flame surface density, and the source and sink terms for the flame surface density, are resolved spatially across the turbulent flame brush. The geometry as well as the dynamics of the flame differ quite significantly from one end of the reaction zone to the other. For instance, contrary to the intuitive idea that flame propagation effects merely counteract the wrinkling due to the turbulence, the role of flame propagation is not constant across the turbulent brush and switches from flame surface production at the front to flame surface dissipation at the back. Direct comparisons with flamelet models are also performed. The Bray-Moss-Libby assumption that the flame surface density is proportional to the flamelet crossing frequency, a quantity that can be measured in experiments, is found to be valid. Major uncertainties remain, however, over an appropriate description of the flamelet crossing frequency. In comparison, the coherent flame model of Marble & Broadwell achieves closure at the level of the Σ-equation and provides a more promising physically based description of the flame surface dynamics. Some areas where the model needs improvement are identified.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax