Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The case for diglossia: Describing the emergence of two grammars in the early acquisition of metropolitan French*


This article supports the diglossic approach to variation in metropolitan French by delving into the subject from the point of view of acquisition. Drawing on naturalistic data from 37 native French children between the ages of 2;3 and 4;0, the investigation exemplifies the existence of two cognate, but distinct grammars in the mind/brain of these children. The distinction between Spontaneous French (G1, all children) and Normed French (G2, 4 children by age 4) hinges upon two crucial characteristics, i.e. the morpho-syntactic status of nominative clitics and the emergence of the negative particle ne. Accusative clitics with imperatives and past-participle agreement are also examined in order to gain a comprehensive picture of the two grammars. Finally, the emergence of ne is interpreted as a trigger forcing a speaker to move from G1 to G2 due to the total unavailability of ne in G1.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Katerina Palasis, Laboratoire Bases, Corpus, Langage - (BCL) UMR 7320, Campus Saint Jean d'Angely - SJA3/MSH, 24 avenue des Diables Bleus, F-06357 Nice Cedex 4France email:
Hide All

I would like to thank Benjamin Massot, Paul Rowlett and two anonymous reviewers for their very constructive comments on earlier versions of this article. This research was supported by the French-German ANR-DFG grant awarded to the project ‘Dialectal, acquisitional, and diachronic data and investigations on subject pronouns in Gallo-Romance’ (DADDIPRO, 2012-2015, no. ANR 11 FRAL 007 01) led by Michèle Oliviéri (BCL UMR 7320 CNRS – Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis) and Georg Kaiser (University of Konstanz).

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Adli (2006). French wh-in-situ Questions and syntactic optionality: evidence from three data types. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 25: 163203.

W. J. Ashby (1981). The loss of the negative particle ne in French: A syntactic change in progress. Language, 57: 647–87.

W. J. Ashby (2001). Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: s'agit-il d'un changement en cours? Journal of French Language Studies, 11.1: 122.

M. C. Baker (2008). The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In: T. Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 351–74.

M. Barra-Jover (2004). Interrogatives, négatives et évolution des traits formels du verbe en français parlé. Langue française, 141: 110–25.

M. Barra-Jover (2010). ‘Le’ français ou ce qui arrive lorsqu'un état de choses est observé comme une entité. Langue française, 168.4: 318.

G. Bernini and P. Ramat (1996). Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe: A Typological Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

C. Blanche-Benveniste (2000). Approches de la langue parlée en français, Paris: Editions Ophrys.

L. L.-S. Cheng and J. Rooryck (2000). Licensing wh-in-situ. Syntax, 3.1: 119.

J. Culbertson (2010). Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: from subject clitic to agreement marker. Language, 86.1: 85132.

C. De Cat (2005). French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua, 115.9: 1195–219.

C. A. Ferguson (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15.1: 325–40.

M.-A. Friedemann (1993). The underlying position of external arguments in French: a study in adult and child grammar. Language Acquisition, 3.3: 209–55.

D. Heap and Y. Roberge (2001). Cliticisation et théorie syntaxique, 1971–2001. Revue québécoise de linguistique, 30.1: 6390.

G. A. Kaiser (1994). More about INFL-ection and Agreement: The Acquisition of Clitic Pronouns in French. In: J. M. Meisel (ed.), Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 131–59.

K. Lambrecht (1981). Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

B. Massot (2010). Le patron diglossique de variation grammaticale en français. Langue française, 168.4: 87106.

J. M. Meisel (2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In: J. Cenoz and F. Genesee (eds), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1141.

F. J. Newmeyer (2005). Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. Pierce (1992). Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

P. Prévost (2009). The Acquisition of French: The Development of Inflectional Morphology and Syntax in L1 Acquisition, Bilingualism, and L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

P. Rowlett (2007). The Syntax of French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

N. Schapansky (2002). The syntax of negation in French: contrariety versus contradiction. Lingua, 112: 793826.

V. Tsakali and E. Anagnostopoulou (2008). Rethinking the clitic doubling parameter: the inverse correlation between clitic doubling and participle agreement. In: D. Kallulli and L. Tasmowski (eds), Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 321–57.

A. M. Zwicky and G. K. Pullum (1983). Cliticization vs. inflection: English N'T. Language, 59.3: 502–13.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of French Language Studies
  • ISSN: 0959-2695
  • EISSN: 1474-0079
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-french-language-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 74 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.