Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:55:14.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A case study of vocalic false starts in a French corpus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2017

GABRIEL BERGOUNIOUX
GABRIEL BERGOUNIOUX*
Affiliation:
Université d'Orléans
*
Address for correspondence: e-mail: gabriel.bergounioux@univ-orleans.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article, based on a French oral corpus, discusses the standing and the interpretation of some vocalic false starts. It recaps the characteristics of false starts and presents the spoken data on which this study is grounded. It details the false starts in the corpus that begin with a vowel in order to draw some conclusions about their form, focusing on the differences between what would be expected and a few discrepancies. The analysis starts from the auditors' perception and proposes an interpretation of the effects of morphophonological constraints.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , November 2018 , pp. 333 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avery, P., Dresher, E. and Rice, K., eds. (2008). Contrasts in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1970). L'appareil formel de l’énonciation. = Langages, 17: 12–18.Google Scholar
Bergounioux, G., Baraduc, J., and Dumont, C. (eds.) (1992). « L'Etude Socio-Linguistique sur Orléans 1966–1991 ». Langue Française, 93: 74–93.Google Scholar
Bergounioux, G. (2008). « Des œufs mués : entendre omelette », Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, https://www.linguistiquefrancaise.org/articles/cmlf/abs/2008/01/cmlf08157/cmlf08157.html.Google Scholar
Bergounioux, G. (2015). « Organisation du discours et énonciation en français parlé. Les changements étudiés à partir d'un enregistrement d'ESLO2 ». Journal of Language and Culture – Language and Information (10), Osaka Prefecture University: 1–22.Google Scholar
Bergounioux, G. (ed.) (2016). Linguistique de corpus. Une étude de cas. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2010). Le français. Usages de la langue parlée. Paris-Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook, 2: 225–252.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. and Hume, E. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In: Goldsmith, J. (ed.), Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 245–306.Google Scholar
Dresher, E. (2008). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. In: Avery, P., Dresher, E. and Rice, K. (eds), Contrasts in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 11–33.Google Scholar
Encrevé, P. (1998). La liaison avec et sans enchaînement. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, E., Hall, K. and Jelinek, F. (2009). Reconstructing false start errors in spontaneous speech text. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL: 255–263. Athens, Greece, 30 March–3 April 2009.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1962). Selected Writings 1. Phonological Studies. The Hague-Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In: Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 43–72.Google Scholar
Ségéral, P. and Scheer, T. (2001). La Coda-Miroir. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 96/1: 107–152.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. (1969). Principles of Phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The Psychobiology of Language. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar