Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Native and non-native perceptions of appropriateness in the French second-person pronoun system

  • RÉMI A. VAN COMPERNOLLE (a1)
Abstract

This article explores perceptions of appropriateness in the French second-person pronoun system in relation to various sociopragmatic factors among native and nonnative speakers of French between the ages of 18 and 29. Participants completed an online survey in which a series of five social-interactive situations were presented. Analysis focused on the similarities and differences among native, near-native, advanced and intermediate speakers in their perceptions of formality, social distance, power/equality and appropriate tu/vous use, as well as correlations between the sociopragmatic factors and selection of tu or vous. Results indicate a high degree of variation within and across participant groups, with nonnatives tending to be more conservative (e.g., more formality, higher frequencies of vous) in their choices than their native-speaker counterparts. In concluding, the findings are discussed in relation to pedagogical implications.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Rémi A. van Compernolle, Department of Modern LanguagesCarnegie Mellon University160 Baker Hall Pittsburgh, PA 15213USA e-mail: vancomp@cmu.edu
References
Hide All
Belz, J. and Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59: 189214.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253276.
Calvet, L-J. (1976). À tu et à vous. Le Français dans le Monde, 118: 1418.
Coveney, A. (2010). Vouvoiement and tutoiement: Sociolinguistic reflections. Journal of French Language Studies, 20.2: 127150.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2002) Variation, chaos et système en interlangue française. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère: 143167.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2004). Vous or tu? Native and non-native speakers of French on a sociolinguistic tightrope. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 42: 383402.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2008). Appropriateness in foreign language acquisition and use: Some theoretical, methodological and ethical considerations. In Manchón, R. and Cenoz, J. (eds.), Doing SLA research: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Issues. Special issue of the International Review of Applied Linguistics, 46: 235255.
Dewaele, J.-M. and Planchenault, G. (2006). « Dites-moi tu?! » La perception de la difficulté du système des pronoms d'adresse en français. In: Faraco, M. (ed.), La classe de langue: Théories, méthodes, pratiques. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l'Université de Provence, pp. 153171.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12: 453476.
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1991). Ni tu ni vous: Principes et paradoxes dans l'emploi des pronoms d'allocution en français contemporain. Journal of French Language Studies, 1: 139155.
Gardner-Chloros, P. (2007). Tu/vous choices: an ‘Act of Identity’? In: Jones, M. and Ayres-Bennett, W. (eds), The French Language and Questions of Identity. London: Legenda, pp. 106115.
Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24: 90121.
Kinginger, C. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. Modern Language Journal, 92 (supplement 1).
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lambert, W. and Tucker, G. R. (1976). Tu, Vous, Usted: A Social-psychological Study of Address Patterns. Newbury House: Rowley.
Liddicoat, A. (2006). Learning the culture of interpersonal relationships: Students’ understandings of personal address forms in French. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3: 5580.
Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15: 263287.
Martiny, T. (1996). Forms of address in French and Dutch: A sociopragmatic approach. Language Sciences, 18: 765775.
Morford, J. (1997). Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7: 337.
Mühlhäusler, P. and Harré, R. (1990). Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23: 193229.
van Compernolle, R. A. (2010). Towards a sociolinguistically responsive pedagogy: Teaching second-person address forms in French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66: 445463.
van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Developing a sociocultural orientation to variation in language. Language & Communication, 31: 8694.
van Compernolle, R. A. (forthcoming). Sociocultural Theory and L2 Instructional Pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Williams, L. and van Compernolle, R. A. (2007). Second-person pronoun use in on-line French-language chat environments. The French Review, 80: 804820.
Williams, L. and van Compernolle, R. A.. (2009). Second-person pronoun use in French language discussion fora. Journal of French Language Studies, 19: 361378.
Wilson, R. and Dewaele, J.-M. (2010) The use of web questionnaires in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26: 103123.
Wivagg, J. (2008). Forced choice. In: Lavrakas, P. J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 289290.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of French Language Studies
  • ISSN: 0959-2695
  • EISSN: 1474-0079
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-french-language-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 86 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 285 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.