Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Singular Agreement in Special Partitive Constructions in Dutch

  • Lotte Hogeweg (a1), Stefanie Ramachers (a1) and Helen de Hoop (a1)
Abstract

Dutch partitive constructions of the type one of the (few) X who Y show a striking pattern of singular subject-verb agreement in their relative clause. This paper presents a corpus study showing that the prescriptively “incorrect” singular agreement pattern is in fact the dominant pattern in Dutch. In order to explain this, we argue that this type of partitive construction often has a specific function in context, namely, to point out that the subject is special or extraordinary, usually for the reason presented by the relative clause. We apply a usage-based approach to this construction within the framework of Construction Grammar, arguing that the prevalent implicature of the subject’s specialness has become a conventionalized part of the meaning of the construction. This analysis then can be used to explain the syntactic pattern of singular agreement within the relative clause. A similar albeit less pronounced pattern can be found in German.*

Copyright
Corresponding author
Radboud University Nijmegen, Centre for Language Studies, Postbus 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, Netherlands [l.hogeweg@let.ru.nl] [s.ramachers@let.ru.nl] [h.dehoop@let.ru.nl]
Footnotes
Hide All
*

We are most grateful to Roeland van Hout for his help with the statistical analyses of the data, and to Lukas Reinarz, who collected and annotated the German data. We would like to thank Sebastian Collin, Geertje van Bergen, Ad Foolen, Johan Kobben, Sander Lestrade, Vera van Mulken, Kees de Schepper, Wessel Stoop, Peter de Swart, Thijs Trompenaars, Ruti Vardi, Puck Wildschut, and Martine Zwets for helpful discussions and comments. A special word of thanks goes to Johan Kobben and Vera van Mulken for translating the Dutch fragments. Versions of this paper were presented at the conferences Structural alternations: Speaker and hearer perspectives (Groningen, August 2011), TIN-dag 2012 (Utrecht, February 2012), and New ways of analyzing syntactic variation (Nijmegen, November 2012). We thank the audiences for their questions and comments. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abrahams, Frits. Geboren columnist [Native columnist]. NRC Handelsblad, April 5, 2012.
Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. 1997, ed. by Walter Haeseryn, Kirstin Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij, & Maarten C. van den Toorn. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff. Available at http://ans.ruhosting.nl.
CGN (Corpus Gesproken Nederlands [Corpus of Spoken Dutch]). Available at http://lands.let.ru.nl/cgn/.
Chip forum. Available at http://forum.chip.de/.
de Volkskrant. Available at https://www.volkskrant.nl/
Fitness com: The global fitness community. Available at http://de.fitness.com.
Fok! Available at forum.fok.nl.
Gutefrage. Available at www.gutefrage.net.
Studis Online: Die schlauen Seiten rund ums Studium [Studis Online: The smart pages for studying]. Available at www.studis-online.de.
WordReference. Available at www.wordreference.com.
Bergen, Geertje van. 2011. Who’s first and what’s next. Animacy and word order variation in Dutch language production. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen dissertation.
Bock, Kathryn, & Miller, Carol A.. 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 23. 4593.
Gessel, Han van, Hulsbosch, Jan Kees, Huurdeman, Henk, Kleef, Bas van, Los, Kees, & Vuijsje, Bert. 1992. De Volkskrant stijlboek. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgeverij.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Science 7. 219224.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Speech acts, ed. by Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L., 4158. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Grondelaers, Stefan, & Roeland, van Hout. 2011. The standard language situation in the low countries: Top-down and bottom-up variations on a diaglossic theme. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23. 199243.
Herring, Susan C. 2010. Computer-mediated conversation: Introduction and overview. Language@Internet 7, article 2.
Hinrichs, Lars. 2016. Modular repertoires in English-using social networks: A study of language choice in the networks of adult Facebook users. English in computer-mediated communication. Variation, representation, and change, ed. by Lauren, Squires, 1742. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hogeweg, Lotte. 2009. Word in process. On the interpretation, acquisition, and production of words. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen/ Utrecht: LOT publications.
Hogeweg, Lotte, Ramachers, Stefanie, & Wottrich, Verena. 2011. Doch, toch and wel on the table. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2011, ed. by Rick, Nouwen & Elenbaas, Marion, 5060. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kilgarriff, Adam. 2007. Googleology is bad science. Computational Linguistics 33. 147151.
Ladusaw, William. 1982. Semantic constraints on the English partitive construction. Proceedings of the First West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Flickinger, Daniel P., Macken, Marlys, & Wiegand, Nancy, 231242. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Pearlmutter, Neal J., Garnsey, Susan M., & Bock, Kathryn. 1999. Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 41. 427456.
Reed, Ann. 1996. Partitives, existentials, and partitive determiners. Partitives. Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions, ed. by Hoeksema, Jacob, 143178. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sanford, Anthony J., Moxey, Linda M., & Paterson, Kevin. 1994. Psychological studies of quantifiers. Journal of Semantics 10. 153170.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18. 523557.
Veenstra, Alma. 2014. Semantic and syntactic constraints on the production of subject-verb agreement. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen dissertation.
Verhagen, Arie. 2002. From parts to wholes and back again. Cognitive Linguistics 13. 403439.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Germanic Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1470-5427
  • EISSN: 1475-3014
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-germanic-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed