Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Some Norwegian “Type Anaphora” are Surface Anaphora

  • Helge Lødrup (a1)

Abstract

The Norwegian pronoun det ‘it, that’ is basically third person neuter singular. Under certain conditions, it can have antecedents that are not neuter singular (for example, Marit kjøpte en kyllingDetkjøpte John også ‘Marit bought a chicken.masc—John bought one too’). Used this way, the pronoun does not refer to the same object as its antecedent; Borthen 2003 refers to it as a “type anaphor.” This article argues that type anaphora are not a unitary phenomenon. There are two groups with very different properties. One group realizes what was called surface anaphora in Hankamer & Sag 1976. The other group has a generic or eventive interpretation.*

Copyright

Corresponding author

Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Pb 1102, Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway, [helge.lodrup@ilf.uio.no]

References

Hide All
Andréasson, Maia. 2008. Not all objects are born alike: Accessibility as a key to pronominal object shift in Swedish and Danish. Proceedings from the LFG08 Conference, ed. by Butt, Miriam & Holloway King, Tracy, 2645. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Andréasson, Maia. 2009. Pronominal object shift—Not just a matter of shifting or not. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84. 120.
Andrews, Avery D. 1990. Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8. 507557.
Borthen, Kaja. 2003. Norwegian bare singulars. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology dissertation. (Available at: http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mM0Y2M3N/).
Borthen, Kaja. 2004. The Norwegian type-anaphor det. Proceedings from the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2004), ed. by Branco, António, McEnery, Tony, & Mitokov, Ruslan, 16. Lisboa: Edições Colibri.
Borthen, Kaja. 2005. Type-anaforen det. MONS 10: Utvalde artiklar frå det tiande Møte om norsk språk i Kristiansand 2003, ed. by Lie, Svein, Nedrelid, Gudlaug, & Omdal, Helge, 117131. Kristiansand, Norway: Høyskoleforlaget AS.
Chisholm, Matt. 2003. Ellipsis in DP. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California Santa Cruz MA thesis. (Available at: http://glyphobet.net/dpe_tree/html/npe_tree.html).
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2004. Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 27. 534.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977. Embedded clause reduction and Scandinavian gender agreement. Journal of Linguistics 13. 239257.
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Lie, Svein, & Vannebo, Kjell Ivar. 1997. Norsk referanse-grammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Hagen, Jon Erik. 1978. Counting objects: A dubious constraint on Norwegian pronominalization. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 2. 122.
Hagen, Jon Erik. 2002. Norsk grammatikk for andrespråkslærere. Oslo: Gyldendal.
Halle, Morris, & Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 275288.
Hankamer, Jorge, & Ivan, A. Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 391426.
Hellan, Lars. 1986. The headedness of NPs in Norwegian. Features and projections, ed. by Muysken, Pieter & van Riemsdijk, Henk, 89122. Dordrecht: Foris.
Herold, Jenny Ström. 2009. Proformen und Ellipsen: Zur Syntax und Diskurspragmatik prädikativer Anaphern im Deutschen und im Schwedischen. (Lunder germanistische Forschungen 70.) Visby: eddy.se.
Houser, Michael J., Mikkelsen, Line, & Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2007. Verb phrase pronominalization in Danish: Deep or surface anaphora? Proceedings from the 34th Western Conference on Linguistics, ed. by Brainbridge, Erin & Agbayani, Brian, 183195. Fresno CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University.
Houser, Michael J., Mikkelsen, Line, & Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2011. A defective auxiliary in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23. 245298.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2. 2135.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2006. Semantic and grammatical genders in Swedish–independent but interacting dimensions. Lingua 116. 13461368.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2009. Peas and pancakes: On apparent disagreement and (null) light verbs in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 32. 3572.
Josefsson, Gunlög. 2010. “Disagreeing” pronominal reference in Swedish and the interplay between formal and semantic gender. Lingua 120. 20952120.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. Syntax and semantics 7: Notes from the linguistic underground, ed. by McCawley, James D., 363385. New York: Academic Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2002. Disjoint reference and the typology of pronouns. More than words, ed. by Kaufmann, Ingrid & Stiebels, Barbara, 179226. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Lori S. 1982. Sluicing: A lexical interpretation procedure. The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. by Bresnan, Joan, 590654. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lødrup, Helge. 1994. “Surface proforms” in Norwegian and the definiteness effect. Proceedings from the 24th Meeting of North East Linguistics Society, ed. by Mercé, Gonzalez, 303315. Amherst: GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.
Lødrup, Helge. 1996. Properties of Norwegian auxiliaries. Proceedings from the 9th International Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, ed. by Kjartan, G. Ottósson, Ruth Vatvedt Fjeld, & Torp, Arne, 216228. Oslo: Novus.
Lødrup, Helge. 2007. Norwegian anaphors without visible binders. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19. 122.
Lødrup, Helge, & Hobæk Haff, Marianne. To appear. Another overt surface anaphor: Norwegian “and that”. Proceedings from the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661738.
Mikkelsen, Kr. 1911. Dansk ordføjningslære. København: Lehmann & Stages Forlag.
Mikkelsen, Line. 2007. On so-called truncated clefts. Kopulaverben und Kopulasätze: Intersprachliche und Intrasprachliche Aspekte, ed. by Geist, Ljudmila & Rothstein, Björn, 4768. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Sag, Ivan A. 1980. Deletion and logical form. New York, NY: Garland.
Sag, Ivan A., & Hankamer, Jorge. 1984. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy 7. 325345.
Sells, Peter. 2000. Negation in Swedish: Where it's not at. Proceedings from the LFG00 Conference, ed. by Butt, Miriam & King, Tracy Holloway, 244263. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Teleman, Ulf, Hellberg, Staffan, & Andersson, Erik. 1999. Svenska akademiens grammatik. Vol. 2, Ord. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.
Williams, Edwin S. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 101139.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed