Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-vtfg7 Total loading time: 0.17 Render date: 2022-05-29T06:48:38.810Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
Journal of Institutional Economics Journal of Institutional Economics

Article contents

Economics is not statistics (and vice versa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2020

Peter T. Leeson
Peter T. Leeson*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: pleeson@gmu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Economic analysis is a theoretical approach, not an empirical one. It is a way of thinking, not a way of testing. An analysis that has an empirical component can be economic without being quantitative: economics is not statistics. An atheoretical analysis can never be economic, no matter how impressive its regressions: statistics is not economics.

Keywords

Economic analysisqualitative methodsquantitative methods
Type
Comment
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 423 - 425
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L. and Weingast, B. R. (1998), Analytic Narratives, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1976), The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1993), ‘The Economic Way of Looking at Life’, Journal of Political Economy, 101: 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1941), Economic Analysis, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1978), ‘Economics and Contiguous Discipline’, Journal of Legal Studies, 7: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1998), ‘The New Institutional Economics’, American Economic Review, 88: 72–74.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1988), Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for Modern Institutional Economics, Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, P. T. (2020), ‘Logic is A Harsh Mistress: Welfare Economics for Economists’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 16: 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, L. v. (1949), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1932), The Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2015), Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Skarbek, D. (2020), ‘Qualitative Research Methods for Institutional Analysis’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. doi:10.1017/S174413741900078X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Economics is not statistics (and vice versa)
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Economics is not statistics (and vice versa)
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Economics is not statistics (and vice versa)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *