Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 35
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Duggan, Anthony John 2016. Cranes and Kiwis: Postal system privatization and institutional realignment. The Japanese Political Economy, p. 1.


    Gorddard, Russell Colloff, Matthew J. Wise, Russell M. Ware, Dan and Dunlop, Michael 2016. Values, rules and knowledge: Adaptation as change in the decision context. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 57, p. 60.


    Pohlner, Huw 2016. Institutional change and the political economy of water megaprojects: China’s south-north water transfer. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 38, p. 205.


    Svetlova, Ekaterina 2016. Enacting Dismal Science.


    Andrews-Speed, Philip 2015. Handbook of Clean Energy Systems.


    Bhaduri, Saradindu Francis, Deep Jyoti Dutt, Dwarkeshwar Kumar, Vineet and Sheikh, Fayaz Ahmad 2015. Politico-Historical Contingencies, Intellectual Property Rights, and Economic Performance Across Countries: A Simultaneous Equation System Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 18, Issue. 3-4, p. 107.


    Bjørnskov, Christian 2015. Constitutional property rights protection and economic growth: evidence from the post-communist transition. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 247.


    Caballero, Gonzalo and Soto-Oñate, David 2015. The Diversity and Rapprochement of Theories of Institutional Change: Original Institutionalism and New Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 49, Issue. 4, p. 947.


    Malagas, K.N. Gritzalis, S. and Nikitakos, N. 2015. How institutional factors that emerge within a public organization affect the use of an innovation by its employees: A case study of Olympic. Tékhne, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 158.


    Sjöstedt, Martin and Sundström, Aksel 2015. Coping with illegal fishing: An institutional account of success and failure in Namibia and South Africa. Biological Conservation, Vol. 189, p. 78.


    Bergh, Andreas Mirkina, Irina and Nilsson, Therese 2014. Globalization and Institutional Quality—A Panel Data Analysis. Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 42, Issue. 3, p. 365.


    Bertz, Julie and Quinn, Martin 2014. Interpreting management accounting rules: an initial study of public bodies. Journal of Management Control, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 319.


    Chen, Jiandong Cumming, Douglas Hou, Wenxuan and Lee, Edward 2014. CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China. Journal of Business Ethics,


    García Osma, Beatriz Gisbert, Ana and de las Heras Cristóbal, Elena 2014. Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union. European Journal of Law and Economics,


    Öner, M. Atilla Benson, Caroline and Göl Beşer, Senem 2014. Linking Organizational Change Management and Organizational Foresight. Strategic Change, Vol. 23, Issue. 3-4, p. 185.


    SEIDLER, VALENTIN 2014. When do institutional transfers work? The relation between institutions, culture and the transplant effect: the case of Borno in north-eastern Nigeria. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, Issue. 03, p. 371.


    Khan, Karim 2013. Distributive consideration in institutional change: the case of Zia’s Islamization policy in Pakistan. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 139.


    Klauer, Bernd Manstetten, Reiner Petersen, Thomas and Schiller, Johannes 2013. The art of long-term thinking: A bridge between sustainability science and politics. Ecological Economics, Vol. 93, p. 79.


    Matthews, Tony 2013. Institutional perspectives on operationalising climate adaptation through planning. Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 198.


    Ngendakuriyo, Fabien and Zaccour, Georges 2013. Fighting corruption: To precommit or not?. Economics Letters, Vol. 120, Issue. 2, p. 149.


    ×
  • Journal of Institutional Economics, Volume 5, Issue 2
  • August 2009, pp. 151-180

Comparing theories of institutional change

  • CHRISTOPHER KINGSTON (a1) and GONZALO CABALLERO (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744137409001283
  • Published online: 01 August 2009
Abstract
Abstract

This article compares a variety of theoretical approaches to conceptualizing institutional change. Our goal is neither to discover the ‘best’ theory, nor to attempt to build a new one. Rather, we wish to compare how the theories we consider agree or differ with respect to the causes, process, and outcomes of institutional change. Some of the theories we discuss emphasize the deliberate creation of institutions through the political process, while others emphasize the spontaneous emergence of institutions through evolutionary processes. Still others combine elements of evolution and design. We differentiate a variety of approaches to conceptualizing the interaction between formal and informal rules. We discuss recent theories based on the ‘Equilibrium View’ of institutions, and theories emphasizing the role of habit, learning, and bounded rationality. We also consider theoretical explanations for institutional inertia and path-dependence.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Comparing theories of institutional change
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Comparing theories of institutional change
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Comparing theories of institutional change
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: cgkingston@amherst.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Acemoglu and J. A. Robinson (2005), ‘The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth’, American Economic Review, 95 (3): 546579.

A. Alchian (1950), ‘Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 58 (3): 211221.

O. Brette (2003), ‘Thorstein Veblen's Theory of Institutional Change: Beyond Technological Determinism’, European Journal of Economic Thought, 10 (3): 455477.

R. Cooter (1993), ‘Against Legal Centrism’, California Law Review, 81 (1): 417429.

P. P. David (1994), ‘Why Are Institutions the “Carriers of History”’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (2): 205220.

T. Eggertsson (1996), ‘No Experiments, Monumental Disasters: Why It Took a Thousand Years to Develop a Specialized Fishing Industry in Iceland’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30 (1): 123.

G. G. Hodgson (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, Routledge.

G. G. Hodgson (2006), ‘What Are Institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1): 125.

G. G. Hodgson and T. Knudsen (2006), ‘Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian Are Misleading’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16: 343366.

M. Kandori (1992), ‘Social Norms and Community Enforcement’, Review of Economic Studies, 59: 6380.

B. B. Kaufman (2007), ‘The Institutional Economics of John R. Commons: Complement and Substitute for Neoclassical Economic Theory’, Socio-Economic Review, 5: 345.

M. Levi (1990), ‘A Logic of Institutional Change’, in K. Schweers and M. Levi (eds.), The Limits of Rationality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

G. Roland (2004), ‘Understanding Insitutional Change: Fast-moving and Slow-moving Institutions’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38 (4): 109131.

R. Sugden (1989), ‘Spontaneous Order’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (4): 8597.

O. Williamson (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 595613.

H. H. Young (1996), ‘The Economics of Convention’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2): 105122.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×