Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Comparing theories of institutional change


This article compares a variety of theoretical approaches to conceptualizing institutional change. Our goal is neither to discover the ‘best’ theory, nor to attempt to build a new one. Rather, we wish to compare how the theories we consider agree or differ with respect to the causes, process, and outcomes of institutional change. Some of the theories we discuss emphasize the deliberate creation of institutions through the political process, while others emphasize the spontaneous emergence of institutions through evolutionary processes. Still others combine elements of evolution and design. We differentiate a variety of approaches to conceptualizing the interaction between formal and informal rules. We discuss recent theories based on the ‘Equilibrium View’ of institutions, and theories emphasizing the role of habit, learning, and bounded rationality. We also consider theoretical explanations for institutional inertia and path-dependence.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Acemoglu and J. A. Robinson (2005), ‘The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth’, American Economic Review, 95 (3): 546579.

A. Alchian (1950), ‘Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 58 (3): 211221.

O. Brette (2003), ‘Thorstein Veblen's Theory of Institutional Change: Beyond Technological Determinism’, European Journal of Economic Thought, 10 (3): 455477.

R. Cooter (1993), ‘Against Legal Centrism’, California Law Review, 81 (1): 417429.

P. P. David (1994), ‘Why Are Institutions the “Carriers of History”’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (2): 205220.

T. Eggertsson (1996), ‘No Experiments, Monumental Disasters: Why It Took a Thousand Years to Develop a Specialized Fishing Industry in Iceland’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30 (1): 123.

G. G. Hodgson (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, Routledge.

G. G. Hodgson (2006), ‘What Are Institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1): 125.

G. G. Hodgson and T. Knudsen (2006), ‘Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian Are Misleading’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16: 343366.

M. Kandori (1992), ‘Social Norms and Community Enforcement’, Review of Economic Studies, 59: 6380.

B. B. Kaufman (2007), ‘The Institutional Economics of John R. Commons: Complement and Substitute for Neoclassical Economic Theory’, Socio-Economic Review, 5: 345.

M. Levi (1990), ‘A Logic of Institutional Change’, in K. Schweers and M. Levi (eds.), The Limits of Rationality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

G. Roland (2004), ‘Understanding Insitutional Change: Fast-moving and Slow-moving Institutions’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 38 (4): 109131.

R. Sugden (1989), ‘Spontaneous Order’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (4): 8597.

O. Williamson (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 595613.

H. H. Young (1996), ‘The Economics of Convention’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2): 105122.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 420 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1316 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.