Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Price theory as prophylactic against popular fallacies


The articles collected in Chicago Price Theory illustrate elements of continuity and change in the development of the Chicago School of Economics. The editors stress a continuity in the Chicago tradition that runs from Frank Knight to Gary Becker. Our contribution in this essay is to emphasize the discontinuity in the evolution of the Chicago price theory tradition. We argue that a logical continuity runs not from the Knight/Viner/Simons generation to the Friedman/Stigler/Becker generation, but to a branch of the Chicago tradition best exemplified by the Alchian/Buchanan/Coase generation of Chicago price theory. The continuity we stress is understanding price theory as a study of market adjustment and adaptation under alternative institutional arrangements.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

G. A. Akerlof and R. J. Shiller (2015), Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

A. A. Alchian (1950), ‘Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 58 (3): 211221.

G. S. Becker (1962), ‘Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 70 (1): 113.

P. J. Boettke (1997), ‘Where Did Economics Go Wrong? Modern Economics as a Flight from Reality’, Critical Review, 11 (1): 1164.

P. J. Boettke and R. A. Candela (2014), ‘Alchian, Buchanan, and Coase: A Neglected Branch of Chicago Price Theory’, Man and the Economy, 1 (2): 189208.

P. J. Boettke and R. Candela (2016), ‘Milton Friedman, James Buchanan, and Constitutional Political Economy’, in R. A. Cord and D. J. Hammond (eds.), Milton Friedman: Contributions to Economics and Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 727740.

J. M. Buchanan (1959), ‘Positive Economics, Welfare Economics, and Political Economy’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 2: 124138.

J. M. Buchanan (1964), ‘What Should Economists Do?’, Southern Economic Journal, 30 (3): 213222.

J. M. Buchanan (2015), ‘Notes on Hayek – Miami, 15 February, 1979’, Review of Austrian Economics, 28 (3): 257260.

R. H. Coase (1959), ‘The Federal Communications Commission’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 2: 140.

H. Demsetz (1968), ‘Why Regulate Utilities?’, Journal of Law and Economics, 11 (1): 5565.

M. Friedman (1947), ‘Lerner on the Economics of Control’, Journal of Political Economy, 55 (5): 450–416.

N. M. Kay (1995), ‘Alchian and the ‘Alchian Thesis’’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 2 (2): 281286.

E. W. Kitch (1983), ‘The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932–1970’, Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1): 163234.

P. A. Samuelson (1948), Economics, New York: McGraw-Hill.

M. N. Shirley (2013), ‘Battles Lost and Wars Won: Reflections on “The Problem of Social Cost”’, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 5 (4): 243247.

G. J. Stigler (1992), ‘Law or Economics?’, Journal of Law and Economics, 35 (2): 455468.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 896 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th January 2017 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.