Skip to main content
×
Home

Institutional change and information production

  • FABIO LANDINI (a1)
Abstract:
Abstract:

The organization of information production is undergoing a deep transformation. Alongside corporations, which have been for long time the predominant institutions of information production, new organizational forms have emerged, e.g. free software communities, open-content on-line wikis, and collective blogs. The paper investigates the factors that favoured the emergence of these alternative systems, called peer production. Different from the previous literature, the paper considers technology as an endogenous variable in the process of organizational design. On this basis, the paper argues that the diffusion of digital technology is a necessary but not sufficient condition to explain the emergence of peer production. A similarly important role has been played by the set of ethics that motivated the early adherents to the free software movement. Such an ethics indeed operated as a ‘cultural subsidy’ that helped to overcome the complementarities existing among distinct institutional domains, and let a new organizational species to emerge.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: fabio.landini@medalics.org
References
Hide All
Aoki M. (2001), Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arrow K. J. (1999), ‘Information and the Organization of Industry’, in Chirchilnisky G. (ed.), Markets, Information, and Uncertainty: Essays in Economic Theory in Honor of Kenneth J. Arrow, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin C. Y. and Clark K. B. (2000), Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin C. Y. and von Hippel E. (2011), ‘Modelling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation’, Organization Science, 22 (6): 13991417.
Benkler Y. (2002a), ‘Coase's penguin, or Linux and the nature of the firm’, Yale Law Journal, 112 (3): 369446.
Benkler Y. (2002b), ‘Intellectual property and the organization of information production’, International Review of Law and Economics, 22 (1): 81107.
Benkler Y. (2006), The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Benkler Y. and Nissenbaum H. (2006), ‘Commons-based peer production and virtue’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 14 (4): 394419.
Berners-Lee T. (1999), Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web, New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
Bowles S. (1985), ‘The production process in a competitive economy: Walrasian, neo-hobbesian, and marxian’, American Economic Review, 75 (1): 1636.
Braverman H. (1974), Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Coase R. H. (1937), ‘The nature of the firm’, Economica, 4 (16): 386405.
Coase R. H. (1960), ‘The problem of social costs’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3(October): 144.
David P. D. and Rullani F. (2008), ‘Dynamics of innovation in an open source collaboration environment: Lurking, laboring, and launching floss projects on Sourceforge’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17 (4): 647710.
Earle J., Pagano U., and Lesi M. (2006), ‘Information technology, organizational form, and transition to the market’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60 (4): 471489.
Elkin-Loren N. and Salzberger E. M. (2000), ‘Law and economics in cyberspace’, International Review of Law and Economics, 19 (4): 553581.
Fristrup J. A. (1994), Usenet: Netnews for Everyone, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hars A. and Ou S. (2002), ‘Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects’, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6 (3): 2539.
Hart O. D. (1995), Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hertel G., Nieder S., and Herrmann S. (2003), ‘Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel’, Research Policy, 32 (7): 11591177.
Kauffman S. (1993), The Origins of Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Landini F. (2012), ‘Technology, property rights and organizational diversity in the software industry’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23 (2): 137150.
Lessig L. (2006), Code: version 2.0, New York: Basic Books.
Mac Cormack A., Rusnak J., and Baldwin C. Y. (2006), ‘Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code’, Management Science, 52 (7): 10151030.
Marglin S. A. (1974), ‘What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production’, Review of Radical Political Economy, 6 (2): 60112.
McGowan D. (2001), ‘Legal implications of open-source software’, University of Illinois Legal Review, 2001 (1): 241304.
Milgrom P. and Roberts J. (1990), ‘Rationalizability, lerning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities’, Econometrica, 58 (6): 12551277.
Moody G. (2001), Rebel Code: Inside Linux and the Open Source Revolution, New York: Basic Books.
Narduzzo A. and Rossi A. (2005), ‘The Role of Modularity in Free/Open Source Software Development’, in Koch S. (ed.), Free/Open Software Development, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Nelson R. R. (1991), ‘Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?’, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue (12): 61–74.
Nuvolari A. (2005), ‘Open source software development: Some historical perspectives’, First Monday, 10 (10).
Pagano U. (1993), ‘Organizational equilibria and institutional stability’, in Bowles S., Gintis H. and Gustafsson B. (eds.), Markets and Democracy: Participation, Accountability and Efficiency, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pagano U. (2011), ‘Interlocking complementarities and institutional change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 7 (3): 373392.
Pagano U. and Rossi M. A. (2004), ‘Incomplete contracts, intellectual property and institutional complementarities’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 18 (1): 5567.
Pagano U. and Rowthorn R. (1994), ‘Ownership, technology and institutional stability’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5 (2): 221242.
Raymond E. S. (1999), The Cathedral and the Bazaar, Sebastopol: O'Reilly and Associates, Inc.
Reagle J. M. J. (2010), Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reidenberg J. R. (1998), ‘Lex informatica: The formulation of information policy rules through technologyTexas Law Review, 76 (3), 553593.
Stallman R. M. (2002), Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman, Boston: GNU Press.
Stone B. (2004), Who Let the Blogs Out? A Hyperconnected Peek at the World of Weblogs, New York: St. Martin's Press.
von Hippel E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, London: MIT Press.
Williamson O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 159 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.