Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

‘Model-Platonism’ in economics: on a classical epistemological critique

  • JAKOB KAPELLER (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Roughly 50 years ago, the eminent German philosopher and social scientist Hans Albert presented a critique of ‘Model-Platonism’ in economics to describe essential elements of the ‘neoclassical style of economic reasoning’. Specifically, Albert advanced a series of epistemological arguments to illustrate conceptual shortcomings in neoclassical theory, which may be utilized to immunize the latter against conflicting empirical evidence. This article summarizes Albert's main arguments and illustrates his most important insights by using simple propositional logic. Based on these findings, a clarification and definition of ‘Model-Platonism’ is offered and the applicability of the Model-Platonism-critique to current developments in mainstream economics is assessed. Finally, two possible extensions of Albert's argument, the concepts of oscillating informational content and axiomatic variation, are illustrated with respect to their potential for immunization against critique.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: jakob.kapeller@jku.at
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Arnold and F. P. Maier-Rigaud (2012), ‘The Enduring Relevance of the Model Platonism Critique for Economics and Public Policy’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 8 (3): 289294.

K. Binmore and A. Shaked (2010), ‘Experimental Economics: Where Next?’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 73 (1): 87100.

A. S. Blinder (1974), ‘The Economics of Brushing Teeth’, Journal of Political Economy, 82 (4): 887891.

J.-P. Bouchaud (2008), ‘Economics Needs a Scientific Revolution’, Nature, 455: 1181.

D. Colander (2000), ‘The Death of Neoclassical Economics’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (2): 128143.

D. Colander , R. P. Holt and J. B. Rosser (2004), ‘The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics’, Review of Political Economy, 16 (4): 485499.

R. Croson and S. Gächter (2010), ‘The Science of Experimental Economics’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 73 (1): 122131.

B. J. De Long , A. Shleifer , L. H. Summers and R. J. Waldmann (1990), ‘Positive Feedback Investment Strategies and Destabilizing Rational Speculation’, Journal of Finance, 45 (2): 379395.

L. Dobusch and J. Kapeller (2009), ‘Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science? New Answers to Veblen's Old Question’, Journal of Economic Issues, 43 (4): 867898.

L. Dobusch and J. Kapeller (2012), ‘Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 46 (4): 10351057.

E. Fehr and K. M. Schmidt (1999), ‘A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (3): 817868.

G. M. Frankfurter and E. G. McGoun (2002), ‘Resistance Is Futile. The Assimilation of Behavioural Finance’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48 (4): 375389.

A. Gibbard and H. R. Varian (1978), ‘Economic Models’, Journal of Philosophy, 75 (11): 664677.

F. Guala (2006), ‘Has Game Theory Been Refuted?Journal of Philosophy, 103 (5): 239263.

O. D. Hart and D. M. Kreps (1986), ‘Price Destabilizing Speculation,’ Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5): 927952.

D. M. Hausman (1990), ‘Supply and Demand Explanations and Their Ceteris Paribus Clauses’, Review of Political Economy, 2 (2): 168187.

D. M. Hausman (1992), The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, New York: Cambridge University Press.

J. R. Hicks (1937), ‘Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation’, Econometrica, 5 (2): 147159.

T. S. Kuhn (1996[1962]), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

E. P. Lazear (2000), ‘Economic Imperialism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (1): 99146.

H. Leibenstein (1950), ‘Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (2): 183207.

F. Modigliani (1944), ‘Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money’, Econometrica, 12 (1): 4588.

M. S. Morgan (2001), ‘Models, Stories and the Economic World’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 8 (3): 361384.

A. Rubinstein (2006), ‘Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist’, Econometrica, 74 (4): 865883.

J. E. Stiglitz (2000), ‘The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (4): 14411478.

R. Sugden (2000), ‘Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 7 (1): 131.

D. Tokic (2012), ‘When Hedging Fails: What Every CEO Should Know About Speculation’, Journal of Management Development, 31 (8): 801807.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.