Skip to main content Accessibility help

‘Model-Platonism’ in economics: on a classical epistemological critique


Roughly 50 years ago, the eminent German philosopher and social scientist Hans Albert presented a critique of ‘Model-Platonism’ in economics to describe essential elements of the ‘neoclassical style of economic reasoning’. Specifically, Albert advanced a series of epistemological arguments to illustrate conceptual shortcomings in neoclassical theory, which may be utilized to immunize the latter against conflicting empirical evidence. This article summarizes Albert's main arguments and illustrates his most important insights by using simple propositional logic. Based on these findings, a clarification and definition of ‘Model-Platonism’ is offered and the applicability of the Model-Platonism-critique to current developments in mainstream economics is assessed. Finally, two possible extensions of Albert's argument, the concepts of oscillating informational content and axiomatic variation, are illustrated with respect to their potential for immunization against critique.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Adorno, T. W., Albert, H., Dahrendorf, R., Habermas, J., Pilot, H., and Popper, K. R. (eds.) (1976), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, New York: Harper & Row.
Albert, H. (1971[1963]), ‘Modell-Platonismus – Der neoklassische Stil des ökonomischen Denkens in kritischer Beleuchtung’, in Topitsch, E. (ed.), Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, pp. 406434.
Albert, H. (1972[1954]), Ökonomische Ideologie und Politische Theorie, 2nd edn, Göttingen: Schwartz & Co.
Albert, H. (1985), Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Albert, H. (1998[1967]), Marktsoziologie und Entscheidungslogik, 2nd edn, Tübingen: Mohr.
Albert, H. (1999), Between Social Science, Religion and Politics: Essays on Critical Rationalism, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Albert, H. (2012[1963]), ‘Model Platonism: Neoclassical Economic Thought in Critical Light’ (translated by Arnold, D. and Maier-Rigaud, F. P.), Journal of Institutional Economics, 8 (3): 295323.
Albert, M. (1996), ‘“Unrealistische Annahmen” und empirische Prüfung – Methodologische Probleme der Ökonomie am Beispiel der Außenhandelstheorie, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, 116, 451486.
Amadae, S. M. (2003), Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Archibald, G. C. (1963), ‘Discussion’, American Economic Review, 53 (2): 227229.
Arnold, D. and Maier-Rigaud, F. P. (2012), ‘The Enduring Relevance of the Model Platonism Critique for Economics and Public Policy’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 8 (3): 289294.
Backhouse, R. E. (2005), ‘The Rise of Free Market Economics: Economists and the Role of the State since 1970’, History of Political Economy, 27 (5): 355392.
Becker, G. S. (1990[1976]), The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Binmore, K. and Shaked, A. (2010), ‘Experimental Economics: Where Next?’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 73 (1): 87100.
Blinder, A. S. (1974), ‘The Economics of Brushing Teeth’, Journal of Political Economy, 82 (4): 887891.
Bouchaud, J.-P. (2008), ‘Economics Needs a Scientific Revolution’, Nature, 455: 1181.
Colander, D. (2000), ‘The Death of Neoclassical Economics’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (2): 128143.
Colander, D., Holt, R. P. and Rosser, J. B. (2004), ‘The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics’, Review of Political Economy, 16 (4): 485499.
Croson, R. and Gächter, S. (2010), ‘The Science of Experimental Economics’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 73 (1): 122131.
De Long, B. J., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H. and Waldmann, R. J. (1990), ‘Positive Feedback Investment Strategies and Destabilizing Rational Speculation’, Journal of Finance, 45 (2): 379395.
Dobusch, L. and Kapeller, J. (2009), ‘Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science? New Answers to Veblen's Old Question’, Journal of Economic Issues, 43 (4): 867898.
Dobusch, L. and Kapeller, J. (2012), ‘Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, 46 (4): 10351057.
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (1999), ‘A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (3): 817868.
Frankfurter, G. M. and McGoun, E. G. (2002), ‘Resistance Is Futile. The Assimilation of Behavioural Finance’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48 (4): 375389.
Friedman, M. (1966[1953]), Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gadenne, V. (1984), Theorie und Erfahrung in der Psychologischen Forschung, Tübingen: Mohr.
Gadenne, V. (1999), ‘Die Funktionen von Ceteris-paribus-Aussagen’, in Löffler, W. and Runggaldier, E. (eds.), Vielfalt und Konvergenz der Philosophie, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, pp. 215219.
Galbraith, J. K. (1967), The New Industrial State, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Garnett, R., Olsen, E. K. and Starr, M. (eds.) (2010), Economic Pluralism, London: Routledge.
Gibbard, A. and Varian, H. R. (1978), ‘Economic Models’, Journal of Philosophy, 75 (11): 664677.
Guala, F. (2006), ‘Has Game Theory Been Refuted?Journal of Philosophy, 103 (5): 239263.
Güth, W. and Kliemt, H. (2003), ‘Experimentelle Ökonomik: Modell-Platonismus in Neuem Gewande?’ in Held, M., Kubon-Gilke, G. and Sturn, R. (eds.), Jahrbuch normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik 2: Experimente in der Ökonomik, Marburg, Germany: Metropolis, pp. 315342.
Hart, O. D. and Kreps, D. M. (1986), ‘Price Destabilizing Speculation,’ Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5): 927952.
Hausman, D. M. (1990), ‘Supply and Demand Explanations and Their Ceteris Paribus Clauses’, Review of Political Economy, 2 (2): 168187.
Hausman, D. M. (1992), The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519530.
Hempel, C. G. (1970[1965]), Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Free Press.
Hicks, J. R. (1937), ‘Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation’, Econometrica, 5 (2): 147159.
Hodgson, G. M. (ed.) (2012), Mathematics and Modern Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Hutchison, T. W. (1965[1938]), Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory, 2nd edn, New York: Augustus Kelley.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996[1962]), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978[1970]), ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91195.
Lawson, T. (2003), Reorienting Economics, London: Routledge.
Lawson, T. (2012), ‘Mathematical Modelling and Ideology in the Economics Academy: Competing Explanations of the Failings of the Modern Discipline?Economic Thought, 1 (1): 322.
Lazear, E. P. (2000), ‘Economic Imperialism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (1): 99146.
Leibenstein, H. (1950), ‘Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (2): 183207.
Leijonhufvud, A. (1973), ‘Life Among the Econ’, Western Economic Journal, 11 (3): 327337.
Markie, P. (2008[2004]), ‘Rationalism vs. Empiricism’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (accessed 19 May 2010).
McCloskey, D. N. (1998[1985]), The Rhetoric of Economics, 2nd edn, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Modigliani, F. (1944), ‘Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money’, Econometrica, 12 (1): 4588.
Morgan, M. S. (2001), ‘Models, Stories and the Economic World’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 8 (3): 361384.
Polanyi, K. (1957[1944]), The Great Transformation, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Popper, K. R. (2010[1959]), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London, UK: Routledge.
Robbins, L. (1945[1932]), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd extended edn, London, UK: Macmillan.
Rosenberg, A. (1976), Microeconomic Laws: A Philosophical Approach, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rubinstein, A. (2006), ‘Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist’, Econometrica, 74 (4): 865883.
Searle, J. R. (2005), ‘What Is an Institution?’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (1): 122.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000), ‘The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (4): 14411478.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2010), ‘An Agenda for Reforming Economic Theory’, Presentation at the 2010 INET Conference at Kings College Cambridge, (accessed 10 September 2012).
Sugden, R. (2000), ‘Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 7 (1): 131.
Suppes, P. (1957), Introduction to Logic, Princeton, NJ: Nostrand.
Swedberg, R. (2005), ‘Markets in Society’, in Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 233253.
Tokic, D. (2012), ‘When Hedging Fails: What Every CEO Should Know About Speculation’, Journal of Management Development, 31 (8): 801807.
Veblen, T. B. (1994[1899]), The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Dover.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed