Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:18:53.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Next steps toward an economics for a creative world: a comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

JOHN FOSTER*
Affiliation:
School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia

Abstract

In this comment I discuss the excellent contribution of Koppl et al. (2014) to our understanding of the role of institutions in the economic system. Much that is offered by them reinforces and extends previous analysis by institutional and evolutionary economists. However, I argue that there are areas of evolutionary economics and complex economic system analysis that need to be integrated into their evolutionary economic perspective to make it more complete. Also, I argue that they are too kind to mainstream economists who purport to deal with institutions and complexity and that they should consider where the boundaries of science should lie in economics.

Type
Article Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Balasko, G. and Geanakoplos, J. (2012), ‘Introduction to general equilibrium’, Journal of Economic Theory, 147: 400406.Google Scholar
Denzau, A. T. and North, D. C. (1994), ‘Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions’, Kyklos, 47 (1): 113.Google Scholar
Dopfer, K., Foster, J., and Potts, J. (2004), ‘Micro meso macro’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14: 263279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlauf, S. (2012),‘Complexity, economics and public policy’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 11: 575.Google Scholar
Foster, J. (2005), ‘From simplistic to complex adaptive systems in economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29: 873892.Google Scholar
Foster, J. (2011), ‘Energy, aesthetics and knowledge in complex economic systems’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 80 (1): 88100.Google Scholar
Foster, J. and Metcalfe, J. S. (2012), ‘Economic emergence: An evolutionary economic perspective’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82: 420432.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. and Solow, R. (1997), A Critical Essay on Modern Macroeconomic Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harper, D. and Lewis, P. (2012), ‘New perspectives on emergence in economics’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82: 329337.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. (2010). Studies on the Abuse and Decline of Reason: Text and Documents. Caldwell, Bruce (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hildago, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A. L., and Hausmann, R. (2007), ‘The product space and the development of nations’, Science, 317: 482487.Google Scholar
Koppl, R., Kauffman, S., Felin, T., and Longo, G. (2014), ‘Economics for a creative world’, Journal of Institutional Economics, (published online), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000150.Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., and Winter, S. (2001), ‘History-friendly models: An overview of the case of the Computer Industry’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4 (3) 6.Google Scholar
Newman, M. (2003), ‘The structure and function of complex networks’, SIAM Review, 45 (2): 167256.Google Scholar
Potts, J. 2000, The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, Competence, and Adaptive Behaviour, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. and Sagan, D. (2005), Into The Cool: Energy Flow, Thermodynamics and Life, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar