Addati, L. (2015). Extending maternity protection to all women: Trends, challenges and opportunities. International Social Security Review, 68(1), 69–93.
Annesley, C. (2007). Women's political agency and welfare reform: Engendering the adult worker model. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3), 452–466.
Bambra, C. (2007). Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 326–338.
Chau, R. C. M., Foster, L., & Yu, S. W. K. (2017). Defamilisation and leave policies – a comparative study of 14 East Asian and non-East Asian countries. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 10(3), 318–333.
Crompton, R. (1999). Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics, 18(1), 1–23.
Elderly Commission. (2017). Elderly services programme plan. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. London: Polity.
Giullari, S., & Lewis, J. (2006). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34(1), 76–104.
Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2001, June). Building a dual-earner/dual-carer society: What can government do? Paper presented at the Sixth Women's Policy Research Conference, Washington, DC.
Hass, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2008). The impact of taking parental leave on fathers’ participation in childcare and relationships with children: Lessons from Sweden, community. Work and Family, 11(1), 85–104.
Hong Kong SAR Government (HKSAR). (2014). Population policy: Thoughts for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Central Government Offices.
Hudson, J., & Kühner, S. (2009). Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(1), 34–46.
Keck, W., & Saraceno, C. (2012). Multilinks database on intergenerational policy indicators. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 132, 453–461.
Kilkey, M., & Merla, L. (2014). Situating transnational families’ care-giving arrangements: The role of institutional contexts. Global Networks, 14(2), 210–229.
Kroger, T. (2011). Defamilisation, dedomestication and care policy: Comparing childcare service provisions of welfare states. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(7/8), 424–440.
Ku, Y. W., & Finer, C. J. (2007). Developments in East Asian welfare studies. Social Policy and Administration, 41(2), 115–131.
Kurowska, A. (2018). (De)familialization and (de)genderization – competing or complementary perspectives in comparative policy analysis? Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 29–49.
Leira, A. (2002). Working parents and the welfare state: Family change and policy reform in Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.
Leung, L. C., & Chan, K. W. (2012). A family-friendly policy for Hong Kong: Lessons from three international experiences. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(1/2), 82–95.
Lewis, J. (2001). The decline of the male breadwinner model: The implications for work and care. Social Politics, 8(2), 152–169.
Lewis, J., & Giullari, S. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34(1), 76–104.
Lister, R. (1994). She has other duties’: Women, citizenship and social security. In Baldwin, S., & Falkingham, J. (Eds.), Social security and social change: New challenges to the Beveridge model (pp. 31–44). New York: Harvester.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 48–65.
Miller, T., & Kim, A. B. (2017). 2017 index of economic freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
Nyberg, A. (2002). Gender, (de)commodification, economic (in)dependence and autonomous households: The case of Sweden. Critical Social Policy, 22(1), 72–95.
Orloff, A. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58, 303–328.
Orloff, J. (2009). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory, 27(3), 317–343.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangement. European Societies, 7(2), 321–347.
Powell, M., & Barrientos, A. (2011). An audit of the welfare modelling business. Social Policy and Administration, 45(1), 69–84.
Richardson, D., Hudson, J., Kühner, S., Frey, V., & Patana, P. (2015). Comparing the effects of cash benefits and in-kind childcare services on family outcomes (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper). Paris: OECD.
Saraceno, C. (2015). A critical look to the social investment approach from a gender perspective. Social Politics, 22(2), 257–269.
Saxonberg, S. (2013). From defamilisation to degenderization: Toward a new welfare typology. Social Policy and Administration, 47(1), 26–49.
Shi, S. J., & Mok, K. H. (2012). Pension privatisation in greater China: Institutional patterns and policy outcomes. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(S1), S30–S45.
Siu, A. (2002). Hong Kong mandatory provident fund. Cato Journal, 22(2), 317–332.
Sung, S., & Pascall, G. (2014). Introduction: Gender and welfare states in East Asia. In Sung, S., & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare state in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 1–28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yu, S., Foster, L., Chau, R., & Lee, A. (2017). An investigation of defamilization/familization measures to assist women to save pension income and strengthen the adult worker model – The case of Hong Kong. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 11, 234–243.