Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Defamilisation and familisation risks, adult worker models, and pro-employment/decommodification measures for women: the case of Hong Kong

  • Sam Wai-Kam Yu (a1), Chui-Man Ruby Chau (a2) and Stefan Kühner (a3)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the research areas of defamilisation/familisation and adult worker models. It particularly focuses on demonstrating how the study of government pro-employment and decommodification measures for reducing defamilisation and familisation risks faced by women contributes to the examination of the adult worker models. It presents three analytical tasks. The first is to categorise the adult worker models into four types (market-focused, supported, choice-focused and collective consumption) based on different combinations of the pro-employment and decommodification measures. The second is to explore the relative desirability of these four types in enhancing women's well-being. Based on the case example of Hong Kong, the third is to examine issues concerning the application of the adult worker models in the analysis of how the government responds to defamilisation and familisation risks.

Copyright

Corresponding author

CONTACT Sam Wai-Kam Yu samyu@hkbu.edu.hk

References

Hide All
Addati, L. (2015). Extending maternity protection to all women: Trends, challenges and opportunities. International Social Security Review, 68(1), 6993.
Annesley, C. (2007). Women's political agency and welfare reform: Engendering the adult worker model. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3), 452466.
Bambra, C. (2007). Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 326338.
Census and Statistics Department. (2016). Quarterly report on general household survey. Retrieved from http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp200.jsp?productCode=B1050001
Census and Statistics Department. (2017). Women and men in Hong Kong – key statistics. Retrieved from https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp180.jsp?productCode=B1130303
Chau, R. C. M., Foster, L., & Yu, S. W. K. (2017). Defamilisation and leave policies – a comparative study of 14 East Asian and non-East Asian countries. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 10(3), 318333.
Commission on Poverty. (2016). Hong Kong poverty situation report 2016. Retrieved from https://www.povertyrelief.gov.hk/eng/pdf/Hong_Kong_Poverty_Situation_Report_2016(2017.11.17).pdf
Crompton, R. (1999). Restructuring gender relations and employment: The decline of the male breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics, 18(1), 123.
Elderly Commission. (2017). Elderly services programme plan. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. London: Polity.
Giullari, S., & Lewis, J. (2006). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34(1), 76104.
Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2001, June). Building a dual-earner/dual-carer society: What can government do? Paper presented at the Sixth Women's Policy Research Conference, Washington, DC.
Hass, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2008). The impact of taking parental leave on fathers’ participation in childcare and relationships with children: Lessons from Sweden, community. Work and Family, 11(1), 85104.
Hong Kong SAR Government (HKSAR). (2014). Population policy: Thoughts for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Central Government Offices.
Hudson, J., & Kühner, S. (2009). Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(1), 3446.
International Network on Leave Policies and Research. (2017). .Country reports. In S. Blum, A. Koslowski, & P. Moss (Eds.), International review of leave policies and research 2017. Leave Policies & Research Network, UK Retrieved from http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/country_reports/.
Keck, W., & Saraceno, C. (2012). Multilinks database on intergenerational policy indicators. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 132, 453461.
Kilkey, M., & Merla, L. (2014). Situating transnational families’ care-giving arrangements: The role of institutional contexts. Global Networks, 14(2), 210229.
Kroger, T. (2011). Defamilisation, dedomestication and care policy: Comparing childcare service provisions of welfare states. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(7/8), 424440.
Ku, Y. W., & Finer, C. J. (2007). Developments in East Asian welfare studies. Social Policy and Administration, 41(2), 115131.
Kurowska, A. (2018). (De)familialization and (de)genderization – competing or complementary perspectives in comparative policy analysis? Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 2949.
Lam, C. (2017). Policy address: We connect for hope and happiness. Retrieved from https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2017/eng/pdf/PA2017.pdf
Leira, A. (2002). Working parents and the welfare state: Family change and policy reform in Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353375.
Leung, L. C. (2014). The 2014 Policy Address. Retrieved from https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2014/eng/pdf/PA2014.pdf.
Leung, L. C., & Chan, K. W. (2012). A family-friendly policy for Hong Kong: Lessons from three international experiences. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(1/2), 8295.
Lewis, J. (2001). The decline of the male breadwinner model: The implications for work and care. Social Politics, 8(2), 152169.
Lewis, J., & Giullari, S. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34(1), 76104.
Lister, R. (1994). She has other duties’: Women, citizenship and social security. In Baldwin, S., & Falkingham, J. (Eds.), Social security and social change: New challenges to the Beveridge model (pp. 3144). New York: Harvester.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 4865.
Miller, T., & Kim, A. B. (2017). 2017 index of economic freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
Nyberg, A. (2002). Gender, (de)commodification, economic (in)dependence and autonomous households: The case of Sweden. Critical Social Policy, 22(1), 7295.
Orloff, A. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58, 303328.
Orloff, J. (2009). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory, 27(3), 317343.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangement. European Societies, 7(2), 321347.
Powell, M., & Barrientos, A. (2011). An audit of the welfare modelling business. Social Policy and Administration, 45(1), 6984.
Richardson, D., Hudson, J., Kühner, S., Frey, V., & Patana, P. (2015). Comparing the effects of cash benefits and in-kind childcare services on family outcomes (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper). Paris: OECD.
Saraceno, C. (2015). A critical look to the social investment approach from a gender perspective. Social Politics, 22(2), 257269.
Saxonberg, S. (2013). From defamilisation to degenderization: Toward a new welfare typology. Social Policy and Administration, 47(1), 2649.
Shi, S. J., & Mok, K. H. (2012). Pension privatisation in greater China: Institutional patterns and policy outcomes. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(S1), S30S45.
Siu, A. (2002). Hong Kong mandatory provident fund. Cato Journal, 22(2), 317332.
Social Welfare Advisory Committee. (2010). Long-term social welfare planning in Hong Kong consultation paper. Retrieved from https://www.gov.hk/en/theme/bf/pdf/SWAC_Consultation_Paper.pdf
Sung, S., & Pascall, G. (2014). Introduction: Gender and welfare states in East Asia. In Sung, S., & Pascall, G. (Eds.), Gender and welfare state in East Asia: Confucianism or gender equality? (pp. 128). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
United Nations. (2017). World Population Prospects 2017. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/
Women's Commission. (2015). Survey on the time use patterns and women's employment. Retrieved from http://www.women.gov.hk/en/publications/research_time_use.html
Yu, S., Foster, L., Chau, R., & Lee, A. (2017). An investigation of defamilization/familization measures to assist women to save pension income and strengthen the adult worker model – The case of Hong Kong. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 11, 234243.

Keywords

Defamilisation and familisation risks, adult worker models, and pro-employment/decommodification measures for women: the case of Hong Kong

  • Sam Wai-Kam Yu (a1), Chui-Man Ruby Chau (a2) and Stefan Kühner (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.