Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-nq5v5 Total loading time: 0.246 Render date: 2022-03-13T19:46:59.434Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Magnetic resonance imaging after frontal sinus surgery with fat obliteration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. Keerl*
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Head, Neck and Facial Plastic Surgery and Communication Disorders, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
R. Weber
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Head, Neck and Facial Plastic Surgery and Communication Disorders, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
G. Kahle
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Communication Disorders and the Institute of Radiology, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
W. Draf
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Head, Neck and Facial Plastic Surgery and Communication Disorders, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
J. Constantinidis
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Head, Neck and Facial Plastic Surgery and Communication Disorders, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
A. Saha
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Departments of Communication Disorders and the Institute of Radiology, Peerless Hospitals, Calcutta, India
*
Dr Rainer Keerl, Department of Otolaryngology, Head, Neck and Facial Plastic Surgery and Communication Disorders, Hospital Fulda, Pacelliallee 4, D 36043 Fulda, Germany. Fax: 0661-842583

Abstract

The obliteration of the frontal sinus via an osteoplastic approach is performed with the aim of achieving a permanent ‘switching off’ by final and conclusive clearing out. For this, freshly harvested abdominal fat has shown itself to be the best clinically. It is possible to demonstrate the vitality of fat transplanted into the frontal sinus without an operation i.e. by a macroscopical and histological examination using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The magnetic resonance examinations were carried out on a supraconductive 0.5 T Magnet (Gyroscan T.S.II, Philips Medicine Systems, Eindhoven, Netherlands) with a quadrature (square) head spool. We produced T1-weighted spin echo images (TR: 450–550 ms; TE: 20–25 ms), T2-weighted fast spin echo images or in double-echo technique in transverse orientation (Turbo SE or TR: 2000–2500 ms; TE: 50–90 ms) and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences for fat suppression (TJ: 140 ms; TR: 1400 ms; TE: 30 ms). The fat implanted into the frontal sinus of 11 patients aged 22–65 years, having undergone an osteoplastic frontal sinus operation with obliteration, was examined post-operatively by MRI. Objectives were the time-dependent distribution of portions of vital fatty or connective tissue, the eventual development of necroses or cysts as well as recurrences, inflammatory complications or re-epithelization of the frontal sinus four to 24 months postoperatively. In only six out of 11 cases was vital fatty tissue found. Fatty necrosis occurred five times, whereas in four cases a transformation into granulation tissue and in one case into connective tissue could be seen. All 11 patients were complaint-free. Long-term observations are needed to see if differences in the recurrence rate of frontal sinus disease are dependent on whether the implanted fat remains vital or necrosed and transformed.

Type
Radiology in Focus
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfoldy, J. (1965) Uber die Anwendung der Myoplastik in der Stirnhohlenchirurgie. Monatsschrift Ohrenheilkunde 99: 217221.Google Scholar
Barton, R. T. (1980) The use of synthetic implant material in osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy. Laryngoscope 90: 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergara, A. R., Itoiz, A. O. (1955) Present state of the surgical treatment of chronic frontal sinusitis. Archives of Otolaryngology 61: 616628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bydder, G. M., Young, J. R. (1985) MR -imaging clinical use of the inversion recovery sequence. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 9: 659675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalano, P. J., Lawson, W., Som, P., Biller, H. F. (1991) Radiographic evaluation and diagnosis of the failed frontal osteoplastic flap with fat obliteration. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 104: 225234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donald, P. J., Bernstein, L. (1978) Compound frontal sinus injuries with intracranial penetration. Laryngoscope 88: 2532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donald, P. J., Ettin, M. (1986) The safety of frontal sinus fat obliteration when sinus walls are missing. Laryngoscope 96: 190193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, A. J., Frank, J. A., Sank, V. Y. (1988) Short T, inversion recovery pulse sequence. Radiology 168: 827836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eason, R. L., Abramson, A. L., Pryor, W. H. Jr., (1976) Experimental results of autogenic cancellous bone chips transplanted into the infected canine frontal sinus cavity. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology 82: 148158.Google Scholar
Fleischer, K. (1973) Erfahrungen mit der osteoplastischen Stirnhohlenchirurgie. Monatsschrift Ohrenheilkunde Wien 107: 603670.Google Scholar
Friedman, C. D., Constantino, P. D., Jones, K., Chow, L.C.. Pelzer, H. J., Sisson, G. A. (1991) Hydroxyapatite cement. II. Obliteration and reconstruction of the cat frontal sinus. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 117: 385389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, R. L., Montgomery, W. W. (1961) Anterior osteoplastic frontal sinus operation. Five years experience. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 70: 860880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahne, B. (1971) Chronic frontal sinusitis treated by autogenous osteoplasty. Ada Otolaryngologica 72: 215219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knauf, H. A. (1963) Single-stage frontal sinus obliteration. Archives of Otolaryngology 78: 707714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G., Lund, V., Phelps, P., Howard, M. D. (1987) MRI in evaluation of nose and paranasal sinus diseases. British Journal of Radiology 60: 957968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macbeth, R. (1954) The osteoplastic operation for chronic infection of the frontal sinus. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 68: 465477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, W. W., Pierce, D. L. (1963) Anterior osteoplastic fat obliteration for frontal sinus: clinical experience and animal studies. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology 67: 4657.Google Scholar
Montgomery, W. W. (1964) The fate of adipose implants in a bony cavity. Laryngoscope 74: 816827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, H., Arakawa, T., Yamashita, T. (1967) Studies on bone transplantation in the frontal sinus of patients and dogs. International Rhinology 5: 4850.Google Scholar
Schenck, N. L. (1974) Frontal sinus disease. I: An historical perspective on research. Laryngoscope 84: 10311044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schenck, N. L. (1975) Frontal sinus disease. Ill: Experimental and clinical factors in failure of the frontal osteoplastic operation. Laryngoscope 85: 7692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smahel, J. (1986) Adipose tissue in plastic surgery. Annals of Plastic Surgery 16: 444453.Google Scholar
Smahel, J. (1989) Experimental implantation of adipose tissue fragments. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 42: 207211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tato, J. M., Sibbald, D. W., Bergaglio, O. E. (1954) Surgical treatment of the frontal sinus by the external route. Laryngoscope 64: 504521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tien, R. D. (1992) Fat suppression MR-imaging in neuroradiology. American Journal of Radiology 158: 369379.Google Scholar
Weber, R., Draf, W., Constantinidis, J. (1994) Osteoplastic macroscopic and microscopic frontal sinus surgery. American Journal of Rhinology 8: 247251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R., Draf, W., Keerl, R. (1995) Aspects of frontal sinus surgery. II: External frontal sinus surgery: osteoplastic approach. HNO 43: 358363.Google Scholar
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Magnetic resonance imaging after frontal sinus surgery with fat obliteration
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Magnetic resonance imaging after frontal sinus surgery with fat obliteration
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Magnetic resonance imaging after frontal sinus surgery with fat obliteration
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *