Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:05:08.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Facial ridge management in canal wall down tympanoplasty for middle-ear cholesteatoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2022

V Capriotti*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otorhinolaryngology and Skull Base Microsurgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
E Dal Cin
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
A Gatto
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
P Boscolo-Rizzo
Affiliation:
Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Italy
G Danesi
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, Section of Otorhinolaryngology and Skull Base Microsurgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
G Tirelli
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Vincenzo Capriotti, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy E-mail: capriotti.orl@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective

To estimate whether leaving a high facial ridge during canal wall down tympanoplasty increases the risk of residual cholesteatoma.

Methods

In this retrospective case review, 321 patients treated with primary canal wall down tympanoplasty for middle-ear cholesteatoma were divided into a completely lowered facial ridge group and a non-completely lowered facial ridge group. Factors affecting facial ridge management, residual disease rate and disease-free survival were analysed.

Results

Residual disease rates were 10.8 per cent in the non-completely lowered facial ridge group and 16.6 per cent in the completely lowered facial ridge group (p = 0.15). Localisation at sinus tympani, mesotympanum or supratubal recess, pre-operative extracranial complications, and destroyed ossicular chain or fixed platina were associated with a completely lowered facial ridge. Residual disease rates and disease-free survival did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusion

Facial ridge can be managed according to cholesteatoma extension. The facial ridge can be maintained high if the cholesteatoma does not involve sinus tympani, mesotympanum or supratubal recess, without increasing the risk of residual disease.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr V Capriotti takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Olszewska, E, Wagner, M, Bernal-Sprekelsen, M, Ebmeyer, J, Dazert, S, Hildmann, H et al. Etiopathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosito, LS, Netto, LFS, Teixeira, AR, da Costa, SS. Classification of cholesteatoma according to growth patterns. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2016;142:168–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, CL, Liao, WH, Shiao, AS. A review of current progress in acquired cholesteatoma management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:3601–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarabichi, M, Nogueira, JF, Marchioni, D, Presutti, L, Pothier, DD, Ayache, S. Transcanal endoscopic management of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2013;46:107–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, Y, See, J, Ng, JH, Low, D, Tan, TY, Yuen, HW. Patterns of middle-ear cholesteatoma and implications for surgical approach. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:116–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komori, M, Morita, Y, Tono, T, Matsuda, K, Yamamoto, Y, Sakagami, M et al. Nationwide survey of middle ear cholesteatoma surgery cases in Japan: results from the Japan Otological Society registry using the JOS staging and classification system. Auris Nasus Larynx 2021;48:555–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanna, M, Sunose, H, Mancini, F. Microsurgical Management of Middle Ear and Petrous Bone Cholesteatoma. New York: Thieme, 2019Google Scholar
Wormald, PJ, Nilssen, ELK. The facial ridge and the discharging mastoid cavity. Laryngoscope 1998;108:92–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wormald, PJ, Hasselt, CAV. A technique of mastoidectomy and meatoplasty that minimizes factors associated with a discharging mastoid cavity. Laryngoscope 1999;109:478–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadol, JB. Causes of failure of mastoidectomy for chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope 1985;95:410–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluth, MB, Metrailer, AM, Dornhoffer, JL, Moore, PC. Patterns of failure in canal wall down mastoidectomy cavity instability. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:9981001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berçin, S, Kutluhan, A, Bozdemir, K, Yalçiner, G, Sari, N, Karameşe, Ö. Results of revision mastoidectomy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2009;129:138–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tos, M. Manual of Middle Ear Surgery. New York: Thieme, 1995Google Scholar
Takahashi, S, Nakano, Y. Tympanoplasty with Mastoid Obliteration by Means of Hydroxyapatite Granules for Aural Cholesteatoma. Amsterdam: Kugler and Ghedini Publications, 1990;419–42Google Scholar
Rosowski, JJ, Merchant, SN. Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction. Otol Neurotol 1995;16:486–97Google ScholarPubMed
Sanna, M, Zini, C, Gamoletti, R, Frau, N, Taibah, AK, Russo, A et al. Petrous bone cholesteatoma. Skull Base Surg 1993;3:201–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Toom, HFE, van der Schroeff, MP, Janssen, JMH, Westzaan, AM, Pauw, RJ. A retrospective analysis and comparison of the STAM and STAMCO classification and EAONO/JOS cholesteatoma staging system in predicting surgical treatment outcomes of middle ear cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 2020;41:e468–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonali, M, Anschuetz, L, Fermi, M, Villari, D, Mariani, GA, Manzoli, L et al. The variants of the retro- and hypotympanum: an endoscopic anatomical study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:2141–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchioni, D, Alicandri-Ciufelli, M, Grammatica, A, Mattioli, F, Presutti, L. Pyramidal eminence and subpyramidal space: an endoscopic anatomical study: pyramidal eminence and subpyramidal space. Laryngoscope 2010;120:557–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alicandri-Ciufelli, M, Fermi, M, Bonali, M, Presutti, L, Marchioni, D, Todeschini, A et al. Facial sinus endoscopic evaluation, radiologic assessment, and classification: Facial Sinus Endoscopic Study. Laryngoscope 2018;128:2397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, TY. Cholesteatoma surgery in pneumatized and non-pneumatized temporal bones. J Chin Med Assoc 2005;68:458–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linder, T, Mulazimoglu, S, El Hadi, T, Darrouzet, V, Ayache, D, Somers, T et al. Iatrogenic facial nerve injuries during chronic otitis media surgery: a multicentre retrospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:521–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryu, NG, Kim, J. How to avoid facial nerve injury in mastoidectomy? J Audiol Otol 2016;20:6872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilssen, ELK, Wormald, PJ. Facial nerve palsy in mastoid surgery. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111:113–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merchant, SN, Ravicz, ME, Voss, SE, Peake, WT, Rosowski, JJ. Middle ear mechanics in normal, diseased and reconstructed ears. J Laryngol Otol 1998;112:715–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed