Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

How good are we at fine needle aspiration cytology?

  • S Carr (a1), V Visvanathan (a1), T Hossain (a1), S Uppal (a1), P Chengot (a1) and C J Woodhead (a1)...
Abstract
AbstractObjectives:

To determine the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology conducted within a standard ENT out-patients service (rather than a one-stop neck lump clinic), and also to assess the value of ultrasound guidance during fine needle aspiration cytology.

Design:

Retrospective study of all patients undergoing fine needle aspiration cytology of a neck lump, from 2005 to 2008 in Leeds teaching hospitals.

Main outcome measures:

Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology, compared with the corresponding histology report of the original surgical specimen, and non-diagnostic fine needle aspiration cytology rates with and without ultrasound.

Results:

Fine needle aspiration cytology yielded the following respective sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates: 85, 91 and 87 per cent for lymph nodes; 80, 93 and 89 for salivary glands; and 52, 80 and 69 for thyroid. The proportion of non-diagnostic procedures was 28 per cent, both with and without ultrasound guidance.

Conclusion:

Cytologist-led fine needle aspiration cytology would have reduced the time to diagnosis and the number of clinic visits per patient. Fine needle aspiration cytology was accurate for predicting malignancy in salivary gland and lymph node lesions, and for diagnosing lymph node pathology. Study results did not support the use of ultrasound guidance during fine needle aspiration cytology.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Mr Simon Carr, ENT Department, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK. E-mail: simon_carr@hotmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All

Presented as a poster at the British Academic Conference of Otolaryngologists, 8–10 July 2009, Liverpool, UK.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancers. London: 2004
2Sadr A, Anand P, Gruber E, Courtney D. ‘One-stop’ head and neck clinic: does it make a difference? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:221
3Kishore A, Stewart CJ, McGarry GW, MacKenzie K. One-stop neck lump clinic: phase 2 of audit. How are we doing? Clin Otolaryngol 2001;26:495–7
4Howlett DC, Harper B, Quante M, Berresford A, Morley M, Grant J et al. Diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in neck lump assessment: results from a regional cancer network over a one year period. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:571–9
5Robinson IA, Cozens NJ. Does a joint ultrasound-guided cytology clinic optomize the cytological evaluation of head and neck masses? Clin Radiol 1999;54:312–16
6Addams-Williams J, Watkins D, Owen S, Williams N, Fielder C. Non-thyroid neck lumps: appraisal of the role of fine needle aspiration cytology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:411–15
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 12 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 108 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.