Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Impact of the nature of the temporalis fascia graft on the outcome of type I underlay tympanoplasty

  • Z Jiang (a1), Z Lou (a2) and Z Lou (a3)
Abstract
Abstract Objectives:

Temporalis fascia has become the most widely used graft for tympanoplasty, as it is strong, durable, and easy to procure and handle. However, the type of temporalis fascia graft to use (i.e. dry or wet) remains controversial. The present review aimed to evaluate the success rates of dry and wet temporalis fascia grafts in type I underlay tympanoplasty.

Methods:

A literature search was performed, using PubMed up to August 2016, to identify all studies of dry and wet temporalis fascia grafts in type I underlay tympanoplasty. The initial search using the key words ‘temporalis fascia’ and ‘tympanoplasty’ identified 130 articles; these were screened by reviewing the titles or abstracts based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ultimately, this review included seven articles.

Results and conclusion:

A dry or wet temporalis fascia graft did not affect the outcome of type I underlay tympanoplasty. However, using wet temporalis fascia could shorten the duration of surgery in type I underlay tympanoplasty. Concerns that the fibroblast count of temporalis fascia may beneficially affect success rate have not been substantiated in clinical reports thus far.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr Zhengcai Lou, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Affiliated Yiwu Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 699 Jiangdong Road, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, China Fax: +86 057 9520 9678 E-mail: louzhengcai@163.com
References
Hide All
1 Zhang ZG, Huang QH, Zheng YQ, Sun W, Chen YB, Si Y. Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:1234–8
2 Hermann H. Tympanic membrane plastic with temporalis fascia [in German]. Hals Nas Ohrenh 1960;9:136–9
3 Rizer FM. Overlay versus underlay tympanoplasty. Part I: historical review of the literature. Laryngoscope 1997;107:125
4 Wehrs RF. Grafting techniques. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999;32:443–55
5 Abul-Hassan HS, von Drasek Ascher G, Acland RD. Surgical anatomy and blood supply of the fascial layers of the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:1728
6 Dabholkar JP, Vora K, Sikdar A. Comparative study of underlay tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia and tragal perichondrium. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;59:116–19
7 Fisch U, May JS, Linder T. Tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery, 2nd edn. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010;92:81
8 Pattersen ME, Lockwood RW, Sheehy JL. Temporalis fascia in tympanic membrane grafting. Arch Otolaryngol 1967;85:287–91
9 Lee HY, Auo HJ, Kang JM. Loop overlay tympanoplasty for anterior or subtotal perforations. Auris Nasus Larynx 2010;37:162–6
10 Pinar E, Sadullahoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S. Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:386–90
11 Salviz M, Bayram O, Bayram AA, Balikci HH, Chatzi T, Paltura C et al. Prognostic factors in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 2015;42:20–3
12 Nardone M, Sommerville R, Bowman J, Danesi G. Myringoplasty in simple chronic otitis media: critical analysis of long-term results in a 1000-adult patient series. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:4853
13 Carr SD, Strachan DR, Raine CH. Factors affecting myringoplasty success. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:23–6
14 Denoyelle F, Roger G, Chauvin P, Garabedian EN. Myringoplasty in children: predictive factors of outcome. Laryngoscope 1999;109:4751
15 Koch WM, Friedman EM, McGill TJ, Healy GB. Tympanoplasty in children. The Boston Children's Hospital experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:3540
16 Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ. Meta-analysis of pediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:530–4
17 Manning SC, Cantekin EI, Kenna MA, Bluestone CD. Prognostic value of Eustachian tube function in pediatric tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1012–16
18 Uyar Y, Keleş B, Koç S, Oztürk K, Arbağ H. Tympanoplasty in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:1805–9
19 Collins WO, Telischi FF, Balkany TJ, Buchman CA. Pediatric tympanoplasty: effect of contralateral ear status on outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:646–51
20 Migirov L, Volkov A. Influence of coexisting myringosclerosis on myringoplasty outcomes in children. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:969–72
21 Alkan S, Baylanĉiĉek S, Sözen E, Baŝak T, Dadaŝ B. Effect of the use of dry (rigid) or wet (soft) temporal fascia graft on tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;38:126–32
22 Loock JW, Naude N. A randomised controlled trial comparing fresh, dried, and dried-then-rehydrated temporalis fascia in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:97101
23 Singh GB, Kumar D, Aggarwal K, Garg S, Arora R, Kumar S. Tympanoplasty: does dry or wet temporalis fascia graft matter? J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:700–5
24 Patterson ME, Lockwood RW, Sheehy JL. Temporalis fascia in tympanic membrane grafting. Arch Otolaryngol 1967;85:287–91
25 Smyth GD, Kerr AG, Nevin NC. Tympanic membrane grafting: animal and tissue culture experiments. J Laryngol Otol 1971;85:1167–71
26 Walby AP, Kerr AG, Nevin NC, Woods G. Tissue culture of surgically prepared temporalis fascia. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1982;7:313–17
27 Aslan S, Uslu S, Köybașioğlu A, Oz O, Ileri F, Ozbilen S. Use of dehydrated temporal fascia in chronic otitis media surgery and tympanoplasty [in Turkish]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2008;18:31–4
28 Bhardwaj V, Verma R, Puri S. Novel method of drying temporalis fascia graft for tympanomastoid surgery. Indian J Otol 2013;19:66–7
29 Reijnen CJ, Kuijpers W. The healing pattern of the drum membrane. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1971;287:174
30 Salén B, Wersäll J. Histologic study of experimental tympanic closure in cats. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1968;244:1532
31 Shenoi PM. Autogenous temporalis fascia grafts: detailed light and electron microscopical observations on the effects of preparations. J Laryngol Otol 1982;96:801–10
32 Lou Z. Natural evolution of an eardrum bridge in patients with a traumatic eardrum perforation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:993–6
33 England RJ, Strachan DR, Buckley JG. Temporalis fascia grafts shrink. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111:707–8
34 Chow LC, Wei WI. Permeatal temporalis fascia graft harvesting for minimally invasive myringoplasty. Laryngoscope 2004;114:386–8
35 Indorewala S. Dimensional stability of the free fascia grafts: an animal experiment. Laryngoscope 2002;112:727–30
36 Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC. Tissue renewal, regeneration and repair. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, eds. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2010;102–3
37 Lou Z, Wang Y, Su K. Comparison of the healing mechanisms of human dry and endogenous wet traumatic eardrum perforations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:2153–7
38 Caylan R, Titiz A, Falcioni M, De Donato G, Russo A, Taibah A et al. Myringoplasty in children: factors influencing surgical outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:709–13
39 Nagle SK, Jagade MV, Gandhi SR, Pawar PV. Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in dry and wet ear. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;61:138–40
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 324 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th March 2017 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.