Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Is pharyngeal pouch stapling superior to open pharyngeal pouch repair? An analysis of a single institution's series

  • E Agalato (a1), J Jose (a1) and R J England (a1)
Abstract
Abstract Background:

Endoscopic stapling has become the primary procedure for pharyngeal pouch surgery because it is quick, less invasive and safe, but less is known about long-term outcomes.

Method:

Medical records were reviewed to compare rates of morbidity, operative failure, symptom control and revision surgery between open and closed procedures.

Results:

A total of 120 pharyngeal pouch procedures, carried out on 97 patients from 2000 to 2014, were studied. These included 80 endoscopic stapling and 40 open procedures. Twelve patients had complications (15 per cent) and there was one mortality (1.2 per cent) in the endoscopic stapling group. Ten patients (25 per cent) developed complications in the open procedure group, with no mortalities. Symptom recurrence was significantly greater in the endoscopic stapling group (26 per cent) than in the open procedure group (7.5 per cent). Multiple surgical procedures were required for 22 endoscopically stapled patients (32 per cent); none were required in the open procedure group. Although the male-to-female ratio for pharyngeal pouch incidence was 2:1, the ratio for multiple surgical procedures was 10:1.

Conclusion:

Endoscopic stapling outcomes are not as good as those following an open approach on long-term follow up, and the early advantages are eliminated if pouch excision is avoided.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Mr Elisha Agalato, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Cottingham HU16 5JQ, UK Fax: (44) 01482 624714 E-mail: agalatoe@yahoo.com
Footnotes
Hide All

Presented at the ENT departmental audit meeting of Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust, 3 October 2014, Cottingham, UK.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1 M Siddiq , S Sood , D. Strachan Pharyngeal pouch (Zenker's diverticulum). Postgrad Med J 2001;77:506–11

2 SC Leong , MD Wilkie , CJ. Webb Endoscopic stapling of Zenker's diverticulum: establishing national baselines for auditing clinical outcomes in the United Kingdom. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:1877–84

4 WM. Trible The surgical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum: endoscopic vs external operation. South Med J 1975;68:1260–2

7 AR Welch , F. Stafford Comparison of endoscopic diathermy and resection in the surgical treatment of pharyngeal diverticula. J Laryngol Otol 1985;99:179–82

8 AG Maran , JA Wilson , AH. Muhanna Pharyngeal diverticula. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1986;11:219–25

9 J Verdonck , RP. Morton Systematic review on treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:3095–107

10 S Mirza , SN Dutt , SN Minhas , RM. Irving A retrospective review of pharyngeal pouch surgery in 56 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002;84:247–51

11 R Seth , K Rajasekaran , WT Lee , RR Lorenz , BG Wood , A Kominsky Patient reported outcomes in endoscopic and open transcervical treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Laryngoscope 2014;124:119–25

12 C Chang , R Payyapilli , R. Scher Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy of Zenker's diverticulum: review of literature and experience of 159 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 2003;113:957–65

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 47 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 360 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.