Skip to main content
×
Home

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in deaf children of deaf parents: comparative study

  • S Hassanzadeh (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

This retrospective study compared the cochlear implantation outcomes of first- and second-generation deaf children.

Methods:

The study group consisted of seven deaf, cochlear-implanted children with deaf parents. An equal number of deaf children with normal-hearing parents were selected by matched sampling as a reference group. Participants were matched based on onset and severity of deafness, duration of deafness, age at cochlear implantation, duration of cochlear implantation, gender, and cochlear implant model. We used the Persian Auditory Perception Test for the Hearing Impaired, the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale, and the Sentence Imitation Test, in order to measure participants' speech perception, speech production and language development, respectively.

Results:

Both groups of children showed auditory and speech development. However, the second-generation deaf children (i.e. deaf children of deaf parents) exceeded the cochlear implantation performance of the deaf children with hearing parents.

Conclusion:

This study confirms that second-generation deaf children exceed deaf children of hearing parents in terms of cochlear implantation performance. Encouraging deaf children to communicate in sign language from a very early age, before cochlear implantation, appears to improve their ability to learn spoken language after cochlear implantation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Dr Saeid Hassanzadeh, University of Tehran, Psychology and Education Faculty, Nasim St, Gisha Bridge, Alleahmad Avenue, Tehran, Iran Fax: 0098 21 88288602, E-mail: shasanz@ut.ac.ir
References
Hide All
1Mayberry RI. Cognitive development in deaf children: the interface of language and perception in neuropsychology. In: Segalowitz SJ, Rapin I, eds. Handbook of Neuropsychology, 2nd edn.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2002;71107
2Sisco F, Anderson RJ. Hearing impaired children's performance on the WISC-R relative to hearing status of parents and child-rearing experiences. Am Ann Deaf 1980;125:923–30
3Conrad R, Weiskrantz BC. On the cognitive ability of hearing impaired children with hearing impaired parents. Am Ann Deaf 1981;126:9951003
4Spencer PE, Deyo D, Grindstaff N. Symbolic play behavior of hearing impaired and hearing toddlers. In: Moores DF, Meadow-Orleans KP, eds. Educational and Developmental Aspects of Hearing Impairment. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press, 1990;390406
5Bandurski M, Galkowski T. The development of analogical reasoning in hearing impaired children and their parents' communication mode. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2004;9:153–75
6Peterson CC, Siegal M. Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1995;36:459–74
7Peterson CC, Siegal M. Domain specificity and everyday biological, physical, and psychological thinking in normal, autistic, and deaf children. In: Wellman MM, Inagaki K, eds. The Emergence of Core Domains of Thought. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997;5570
8Peterson CC, Siegal M. Changing focus on the representational mind: deaf, autistic and normal children's concepts of false photos, false drawings and false beliefs. Brit J Dev Psychol 1998;16:301–20
9Peterson CC, Siegal M. Representing inner worlds: theory of mind in autistic, deaf, and normal hearing children. Psychol Sci 1999;10:126–9
10Peterson CC, Siegal M. Insights into theory of mind from deafness and autism. Mind Lang 2000;15:7799
11Russell PA, Hosie JA, Gray CD, Scott C, Hunter N, Banks JS et al. The development of theory of mind in deaf children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1998;39:903–10
12Courtin C. The impact of sign language on cognitive development of deaf children: the case of theories of mind. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2000;5:266–76
13Woolfe T, Want S, Siegal M. Signposts to development: theory of mind in deaf children. Child Development 2002;73:768–78
14Geers A, Schick B. Acquisition of spoken and signed English by hearing-impaired children of hearing-impaired or hearing parents. J Speech Hear Disord 1988;53:136–43
15Braden JP. An explanation of the superior performance IQs of deaf children of deaf parents. Am Ann Deaf 1987;132:263–6
16Bettger JG, Emmorey K, Bellugi U. Enhanced facial discrimination: effects of experience with American Sign Language. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1997;2:223–33
17Wolff AB, Thatcher RW. Cortical reorganization in deaf children. J Clin Exp Neuropsych 1990;12:209–21
18Mayberry RI. Deaf children's reading comprehension in reaction to sign language structure and input. Applied Psycholinguistics 2007;28:537–49
19Mayberry RI. When timing is everything: Age of first-language acquisition effects on second-language learning. Appl Psycholinguistics 2007;28:537–49
20Hassanzadeh S. Adaptation and Standardization of Persian Auditory Perception Test for Hearing Impaired Children [in Persian].Tehran: RIES, 2001
21Allen MC, Nikolopoulos TP, O'Donoghue GM. Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1998;19:742–5
22Seeff-Gabriel B, Chiat S, Dodd B. Sentence imitation as a tool in identifying expressive morphosyntactic difficulties in children with severe speech difficulties. Int J Lang Comm Dis 2010;45:691702
23Hassanzadeh S, Minaei A. Adaptation and normalization of Persian language development test for Persian language children in Tehran [in Persian]. Research on Exceptional Children 2001;1:119–35
24Schlesinger HS, Meadow KP. Sound and Sign: Childhood Deafness and Mental Health. Berkley: University of California Press, 1972
25Bellugi U, O'Grady L, Lillo-Martin D, Hynes MO, Van Hoek K, Corina D: Enhancement of spatial cognition in deaf children. In: Volterra V, Erting CJ, eds. From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990;278–98
26Adams JW. You and Your Deaf Child: A Self-Help Guide for Parents of Deaf and Hard-of-hearing Children. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press, 1997
27Boudreault P, Mayberry RI. Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Lang Cognitive Proc 2006;21:608–35
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 184 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1362 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.