Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Receptive (aural) vocabulary development in children with permanent bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment

  • C Kiese-Himmel (a1)

The receptive (aural) vocabulary development of children with binaural-aided residual hearing was investigated in a prospective longitudinal analysis (repeated measures).

Patient and methods:

Thirty-three children with sensorineural hearing loss, without major co-morbidities (mean age at the first testing point, 56.2 months, standard deviation 19.0 months) were recruited from the 1994 German Goettinger Hearing Language Register. Their receptive vocabulary was measured using standardised tests (with reference to normal hearing child performance) on three separate test points (mean follow up, 18.7 months, standard deviation 5.0 months).


On average, the study group scored below the normal range at the first and second tests and made a significant improvement at the last test. The degree of hearing loss was found to be significantly correlated to vocabulary performance at all time points, with increasing correlation coefficients. At the third test, significant predictive variables for successful receptive vocabulary outcome were found to be: degree of hearing loss (t = 5.43; p < 0.0001); age at diagnosis (t = 2.29; p = 0.03); and nonverbal intelligence (t = 2.82; p = 0.009).


If permanent childhood hearing impairment is mild and/or is detected early, and if the child grows up in a monolingual environment, the development of receptive vocabulary within the normal range is possible.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Professor Dr rer nat Dipl-Psych Christiane Kiese-Himmel, Clinical Psychologist, Department of Phoniatrics/Pedaudiology, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Robert Koch Str 40, D-37075 Goettingen, Germany. Fax: 0049 551/392812 E-mail:
Hide All
1 Benedict H. Early lexical development: comprehension and production. J Child Lang 1979;6:183200
2 Gupta P, MacWhinney B. Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short term memory: computation and neural bases. Brain Lang 1997;59:267333
3 Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K. Word learning. Icon, index, or symbol? In: Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K, Bloom L, Smith LB, Woodward AL, Akhtar N, Tomasello M, Hollich G, eds. Becoming a Word Learner. A Debate on Lexical Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000;315
4 Bates E, Dale PS, Thal D. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In: Fletcher P, MacWhinney B, eds. The Handbook of Child Language. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1995;96152
5 Marchman V, Bates E. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. J Child Lang 1994;21:339–66
6 Thal DJ, Bates E, Zappia MJ, Oroz M. Ties between lexical and grammatical development: evidence from early-talkers. J Child Lang 1996;23:349–68
7 Bishop DVM, Snowling MJ. Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychol Bull 2004;130:858–86
8 Vermeer A. Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics 2001;22:217–34
9 Moeller MP, Osberger MJ, Eccarius M. Receptive language skills. Monographs of the ASHA 1986;23:4153
10 Ramkalawan TW, Davis AC. The effects of hearing loss and age of intervention on some language metrics in young hearing-impaired children. Br J Audiol 1992;26:97107
11 Mayne A, Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL. Receptive vocabulary development of infants and toddlers who are deaf or hard of hearing. Volta Rev 2000;100:2952
12 Lederberg AR, Spencer PE. Vocabulary development of deaf and hard of hearing children. In: Clark MD, Marschak M, Karchmer M, eds. Context, Cognition, and Deafness. Washinton DC: Gallaudet University Press, 2001;88112
13 Kiese-Himmel C, Ohlwein S. Vocubulary of young children with sensorineural deafness. [in German]. HNO 2002;50:4854
14 Boothroyd A, Geers AE, Moog JS. Practical implications of cochlear implants in children. Ear Hear 1991; 12(suppl 4):81S89S
15 Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Osberger MJ. Lexical effects of spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995;16:470–81
16 Robbins AM, Svirsky M, Kirk KI. Children with implants can speak, but can they communicate? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:155–60
17 Szagun G. Some aspects of language development in normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18:131–4
18 Szagun G. Language acquisition in children with cochlear implants; First results of a development psycholinguistic study [in German]. Sprache Stimme Gehör 1998;22:133–8
19 Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Science 2000;11:153–8
20 El-Hakim H, Levasseur J, Papsin BC, Panesar J, Mount RJ, Stevens D et al. Assessment of vocabulary development in children after cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1053–9
21 Dawson PW, Busby PA, McKay CM, Clark GM. Short-term auditory memory in children using cochlear-implants and its relevance to receptive language. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:789801
22 O'Leary Kane M, Schopmeyer B, Mellon NK, Wang NY, Niparko JK. Prelinguistic communication and subsequent language acquisition in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:619–23
23 Burgemeister B, Blum LM, Lorge I. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale, 3rd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972
24 Eggert D. The Columbia Mental Maturity Scale as an individually administered instrument for normally developed children from 3 to 10 years old [in German]. In: Eggert D, ed. Zur Diagnose der Minderbegabung. Beltz: Weinheim, 1992;185201
25 Becker P, Schaller S, Schmidtke A. Coloured Progressive Matrices. Manual of the German version. Weinheim: Beltz, 1980
26 Grimm H. Language Development Test for Two Years Old [in German]. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2000
27 Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service, 1981
28 Hebbel G, Horn R. French Pictorial Test of Intelligence [in German]. Weinheim: Beltz, 1976
29 Blamey PJ, Sarant JZ, Paatsch LE, Barry JG, Bow CP, Wales RJ et al. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44:264–85
30 Pittman AL, Lewis DE, Hoover BM, Stelmachowicz PG. Rapid word-learning in normal hearing and hearing-impaired children: effects of age, receptive vocabulary, and high-frequency amplification. Ear Hear 2005;6:619–29
31 Davis JM, Elfenbein J, Schum R, Bentler RA. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. J Speech Hear Disord 1986;51:5362
32 Gilbertson M, Kamhi A. Novel word learning in children with hearing impairment. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:630–42
33 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102:1161–71
34 Yoshinaga-Itano C. Early identification: an opportunity and challenge for audiology. Semin Hear 1999;20:317–31
35 Kennedy CR, McCann DC, Campbell MJ, Law CM, Mullee M, Petrou S et al. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2131–41
36 Neumann K, Gross M, Böttcher P, Euler HA, Spormann-Lagodzinski M, Polzer M. Effectiveness and efficiency of a universal newborn hearing screening in Germany. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2006;58:440–55
37 Huttenlocher J. Language input and language growth. Prev Med 1998;27:195–9
38 Dromi E. Early lexical development. In: Barrett M, ed. The Development of Language: Studies in Development Psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 1999;99131
39 Kennedy CR. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment: coverage, positive predictive value, effect on mothers and incremental yield. Wessex Universal Neonatal Screening Trial Group. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1999;88:73–5
40 Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, Homer CJ, Helfand M. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. JAMA 2001;286:2000–10
41 Yoshinaga-Itano C, Coulter D, Thompson V. The Colorado Newborn Hearing Screening Project: effects on speech and language development for children with hearing loss. J Perinatol 2000;20:S132–7
42 Kennedy C, McCann D. Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F378–83
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 116 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.