Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A UK survey of current ENT practice in the assessment of nasal patency

  • P Andrews (a1), J Joseph (a1), C-H Li (a2), L Nip (a2), T Jacques (a3) and T Leung (a2)...
Abstract
Abstract Background:

Nasal obstruction is a common ENT complaint; however, decisions on its management are challenging, with high rates of dissatisfaction following surgery. This study investigated the practice of UK clinicians in the evaluation of nasal patency.

Method:

Seventy-eight UK-based rhinologists were surveyed at the 2015 British Academic Conference in Otolaryngology.

Results:

Clinical history and examination are almost universally used to evaluate nasal blockage. The most commonly used test was the nasal misting pattern (73 per cent), followed by peak nasal inspiratory flow (19 per cent). The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 or 23 was utilised by 29 per cent of respondents. Sixty-three per cent of respondents reported that a lack of equipment was the principle reason for not using objective measures, followed by time constraints and a lack of correlation with symptom scores.

Conclusion:

British clinicians rely on clinical skills to evaluate nasal blockage. There is a desire for a simple, non-invasive device that objectively measures airflow for nasal breathing during physiological resting and correlates with subjective symptom scores.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Mr Thomas Jacques, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK E-mail: thomas.jacques@nhs.net
References
Hide All
1 JessenM, MalmL. Definition, prevalence and development of nasal obstruction. Allergy 1997;52:36
2 ChandraRK, PatadiaMO, RavivJ. Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:207–25
3 LundVJ. Objective assessment of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1989;22:279–90
4 MurrellG. Components of the nasal examination. Aesthet Surg J 2013;33:3842
5 HellingsPW, ScaddingG, AlobidI, BachertC, FokkensWJ, Gerth van WijkR et al. Executive summary of European Task Force document on diagnostic tools in rhinology. Rhinology 2012;50:339–52
6 HilbergO. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Allergy 2002;57(suppl 70):539
7 ClementPA, HalewyckS, GordtsF, MichelO. Critical evaluation of different objective techniques of nasal airway assessment: a clinical review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:2617–25
8 MamikogluB, HouserS, AkbarI, NgB, CoreyJP. Acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography scans for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation, with clinical correlation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:61–8
9 CoreyJP, GungorA, NelsonR, FredbergJ, LaiV. A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:349–54
10 ChavesC, de AndradeCR, IbiapinaC. Objective measures for functional diagnostic of the upper airways: practical aspects. Rhinology 2014;52:99103
11 AndrewsPJ, ChowdhuryN, TakharA, PoirrierAL, JacquesT, RandhawaPS. The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer? Clin Otolaryngol 2015;40:698703
12 NathanRA, EcclesR, HowarthPH, SteinsvågSK, TogiasA. Objective monitoring of nasal patency and nasal physiology in rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;115:S44259
13 StewartMG, WitsellDL, SmithTL, WeaverEM, YuehB, HannleyMT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:157–63
14 TakharAS, StephensJ, RandhawaPS, PoirrierAL, AndrewsP. Validation of the sino-nasal outcome test-23 in septorhinoplasty surgery. Rhinology 2014;52:320–6
15 PoirrierAL, AhluwaliaS, GoodsonA, EllisM, BentleyM, AndrewsP. Is the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 a suitable evaluation for septorhinoplasty? Laryngoscope 2013;123:7681
16 HopkinsC, GillettS, SlackR, LundVJ, BrowneJP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:447–54
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
  • ISSN: 0022-2151
  • EISSN: 1748-5460
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-laryngology-and-otology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 169 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 27th June 2017 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.