Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-m744c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-16T12:54:31.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multicultural Market Democracy: Elites and Indigenous Movements in Contemporary Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2011

JAMES D. BOWEN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper bridges the gap between studies of subaltern social movements and elite politics by asking how political and economic elites respond to indigenous mobilisation in Ecuador. I argue that elites have developed a hegemonic project based around three core principles – multiculturalism, economic liberalism and democracy – that serves to incorporate indigenous peoples into the political system while simultaneously excluding indigenous movement demands that would undermine the political and economic sources of elite power. The paper develops this argument around a concept of what I call ‘multicultural market democracy’ based on historical analysis and in-depth interviews with 43 Ecuadorian elites.

Spanish abstract

Este artículo conecta los estudios de los movimientos sociales subalternos y los de las políticas de las elites al preguntarse cómo las elites políticas y económicas responden a las movilizaciones indígenas en Ecuador. Yo sostengo que las elites han desarrollado un proyecto hegemónico basado alrededor de tres conceptos principales: multiculturalismo, liberalismo económico y democracia. Tales principios sirven para incorporar a los pueblos indígenas dentro del sistema político, mientras que al mismo tiempo excluyen las demandas de los movimientos indígenas que debilitarían las fuentes políticas y económicas del poder de las élites. El artículo desarrolla este argumento alrededor de un concepto que llamo ‘democracia multicultural de mercado’ basado en el análisis histórico y entrevistas a profundidad a 43 representantes de las élites ecuatorianas.

Portuguese abstract

Ao perguntar como as elites políticas e econômicas reagem à mobilização indígena no Equador, o artigo preenche a lacuna que existe entre os estudos sobre movimentos sociais subalternos e os estudos acerca das políticas das elites. Argumento que as elites desenvolveram um projeto hegemônico baseado em três princípios fundamentais, sendo estes o multiculturalismo, o liberalismo econômico e a democracia, que servem para incorporar os povos indígenas ao sistema político enquanto excluem as demandas dos movimentos indígenas (que minariam as fontes de poder políticas e econômicas das elites). O argumento é desenvolvido em torno de um conceito que chamo de ‘democracia multicultural de mercado’, fundamentado por análise histórica e entrevistas abrangentes com 43 membros da elite equatoriana.

Keywords

elitesindigenous movementsCONAIEEcuadormulticulturalismpolitical incorporationelitesmovimientos indígenasCONAIEEcuadormulticulturalismoincorporación políticaelitesmovimentos indígenasCONAIEEquadormulticulturalismoincorporação política

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , August 2011 , pp. 451 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 ‘20 años después, la plataforma de lucha indígena es la misma’, El Comercio, 28 May 2010Google Scholar.

2 Hall, Gillette and Patrinos, Harry, Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Human Development in Latin America: 1994–2004 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Collier, Ruth and Collier, David, Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002 [1991])Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., p. 50.

5 Ibid., p. xv.

6 Yashar, Deborah, Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Hale, Charles R., ‘Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights, and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 34: 3 (2002), pp. 485–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Donna Lee Van Cott, ‘Multiculturalism versus Neoliberalism in Latin America’, in Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka (eds.), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 272–96.

9 Conaghan, Catherine and Malloy, James, Unsettling Statecraft: Democracy and Neoliberalism in the Central Andes (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Montúfar, César, La reconstrucción neoliberal: Febres Cordero o la estatización del neoliberalismo en el Ecuador, 1984–1988 (Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar and Ediciones Abya-Yala, 2000)Google Scholar; Silva, Eduardo, Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

10 Montúfar, La reconstrucción neoliberal; Silva, Challenging Neoliberalism.

11 Lucero, José Antonio, Struggles of Voice: The Politics of Indigenous Representation in the Andes (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2008), p. 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Hale, ‘Does Multiculturalism Menace?’.

13 Ibid., p. 487.

14 Hale, Charles R., Más que un indio (More than an Indian): Racial Ambivalence and Neoliberal Multiculturalism in Guatemala (Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

15 Ibid., p. 75.

16 Richards, Patricia, ‘Of Indians and Terrorists: How the State and Local Elites Construct the Mapuche in Neoliberal Multicultural Chile’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 42: 1 (2010), pp. 59–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Hale, ‘Does Multiculturalism Menace?’, p. 490.

18 These numbers add up to 44 rather than 43 (the number of interviewees) – former president Lucio Gutiérrez is counted as both a military and a political elite since his role in both areas has been crucial in the evolution of Ecuador's indigenous peoples' movement.

19 Fabricant, Nicole, ‘Performative Politics: The Camba Countermovement in Eastern Bolivia’, American Ethnologist, 36: 4 (2009), pp. 768–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Cris Shore, ‘Introduction: Towards an Anthropology of Elites’, in Cris Shore and Stephen Nugent (eds.), Elite Cultures: Anthropological Perspectives (New York: Routledge, 2002), p. 4.

21 Scott, James, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

22 Shore, ‘Introduction’, p. 4.

23 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (New York: International Publishers, 1971)Google Scholar.

24 Webber, Jeffrey, ‘Indigenous Struggle in Latin America: The Perilous Invisibility of Capital and Class’, Latin American Politics and Society, 49: 3 (2007), pp. 191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Kurtz, Marcus, ‘The Dilemmas of Democracy in the Open Economy: Lessons from Latin America’, World Politics, 56: 1 (2004), pp. 262–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Bobrow-Strain, Aaron, Intimate Enemies: Landowners, Power, and Violence in Chiapas (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fabricant, ‘Performative Politics’.

27 Mallon, Florencia, Peasant and Nation: The Making of Postcolonial Mexico and Peru (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

28 Prieto, Mercedes, Liberalismo y temor: imaginando los sujetos indígenas en el Ecuador postcolonial, 1895–1950 (Quito: FLACSO Ecuador and Ediciones Abya-Yala, 2004)Google Scholar.

29 Conaghan, Catherine and Espinal, Rosario, ‘Unlikely Transitions to Uncertain Regimes? Democracy Without Compromise in the Dominican Republic and Ecuador’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 22: 3 (1990), pp. 553–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 For a thorough history of the evolution of indigenous political incorporation (although he does not use this terminology), see Becker, Marc, Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador's Modern Indigenous Movements (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Ibid.

32 Pallares, Amalia, From Peasant Struggles to Indian Resistance: The Ecuadorian Andes in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 2002), p. 200Google Scholar.

33 For a more thorough discussion of the electoral successes (and failures) of Pachakutik, see Van Cott, Donna Lee, From Movements to Parties in Latin America: The Evolution of Ethnic Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Moreno, Segundo and Figueroa, José, El levantamiento indígena de Inti Raymi de 1990 (Quito: FESO and Ediciones Abya-Yala, 1992)Google Scholar.

35 Interview with Rodrigo Borja, Quito, 15 Sep. 2006.

36 Interview with Gonzalo Ortiz Crespo, Quito, 18 June 2007.

37 Interview with Fabián Corral, Quito, 27 June 2007.

38 Andolina, Robert, ‘The Sovereign and Its Shadow: Constituent Assembly and Indigenous Movement in Ecuador’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 35: 1 (2003), pp. 721–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Ibid., p. 737.

40 Andrade, Pablo, Democracia y cambio político en el Ecuador (Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, 2009), p. 200Google Scholar.

41 Ibid., p. 164.

42 The best summary of these documents is available in a compilation published by CORDES in 1996 entitled Ecuador: un problema de gobernabilidad.

43 ‘Asamblea Nacional para la reforma política: límites y posibilidades’ (CORDES working paper, April 1997) and ‘Partidos políticos: el eslabón perdido de la representación’ (CORDES working paper, March 1998), cited in Hurtado, Osvaldo, Una constitución para el futuro (Quito: FESO, 1998), pp. 169–70Google Scholar.

44 ‘Temas para la reforma constitucional ecuatoriana’ (CORDES working paper, Jan. 1998) and ‘Gobernabilidad durante la crisis y políticas de ajuste’ (CORDES working paper, May 1998), cited in Hurtado, , Una constitución, pp. 170–1Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., p. 184.

46 For details on the contentious horse-trading during the Constitutional Assembly, see the memoirs of two opposing participants in the assembly: Hurtado, , Una constitución; and Alfredo Vera, Larga crónica de la constituyente por dentro (Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala, 1999)Google Scholar.

47 José Antonio Lucero, ‘Arts of Unification: Political Representation and Indigenous Movements in Bolivia and Ecuador’, PhD diss., Princeton University, 2002, p. 108.

48 Ibid., pp. 109–10.

49 Zamosc, Leon, ‘The Indian Movement and Political Democracy in Ecuador’, Latin American Politics and Society, 49: 3 (2007), pp. 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Beckerman, Paul and Solimano, Andrés, Ecuador's Crisis and Dollarization (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Mendoza, Carlos, ¿Quién derrocó a Mahuad? (Quito: Ediecuatorial, 2001)Google Scholar.

52 Gerlach, Allen, Indians, Oil, and Politics: A Recent History of Ecuador (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 2003), pp. 171–2Google Scholar.

53 María Cuvi Sánchez, ‘Disonancias entre las élites empresariales a principios del siglo XXI’, in Victor Bretón and Francisco García (eds.), Estado, etnicidad y movimientos sociales en América Latina: Ecuador en crisis (Barcelona: Icaria, 2003), pp. 291–9; Pallares, , From Peasant Struggles to Indian Resistance, p. 223Google Scholar.

54 Méndez, Cecilia, ‘Incas Sí, Indios No: Notes on Peruvian Creole Nationalism and its Contemporary Crisis’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 28: 1 (1996), p. 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Interview with Ignacio Pérez, Quito, 6 July 2007.

56 ‘Cámara de Agricultura: excesiva politicización del movimiento indígena’, El Comercio, 10 April 1990Google Scholar.

57 ‘Indígenas quieren crear su Estado’, El Universo, 2 April 1992Google Scholar.

58 Interview with Patricio Donoso, Quito, 24 Oct. 2006.

59 Interview with Lucio Gutiérrez, Quito, 13 Oct. 2006.

60 Interview with María Gloria Alarcón, Guayaquil, 10 July 2007.

61 There is a significant body of historical literature on Otavalo and elite representations of the Otavaleños that is too rich to do justice to here. See Blanca Muratorio, ‘Nación, identidad y etnicidad: imágenes de los indios ecuatorianos y sus imageneros a fines del siglo XIX’, in Muratorio (ed.), Imágenes e imagineros: representaciones de los indígenas ecuatorianos, siglos XIX y XX (Quito: FLACSO, 1994), pp. 109–96; Derek Williams, ‘Administering the Otavalan Indian and Centralizing Governance in Ecuador, 1851–1875’, in A. Kim Clark and Marc Becker (eds.), Highland Indians and the State in Modern Ecuador (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007), pp. 37–55.

62 Meisch, Lynn, Andean Entrepreneurs: Otavalo Merchants and Musicians in the Global Arena (Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

63 Hurtado, Osvaldo, Las costumbres de los ecuatorianos (Quito: Editorial Planeta del Ecuador, 2007), pp. 262–3. My translationGoogle Scholar.

64 de Alcázar, Gabriela Córdova, Anatomía de los golpes de estado: la prensa en la caída de Mahuad y Bucaram (Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala, 2003)Google Scholar.

65 ‘Otavalo: Ciudad Bolivariana’, El Comercio, 28 Oct. 1993Google Scholar.

66 ‘Otavaleños en la capital del mundo’, El Comercio, 15 Jan. 1994Google Scholar.

67 ‘Imbabura … La Suiza de América’, El Universo, 2 Nov. 1994Google Scholar.

68 ‘¿Qué ha hecho la CONAIE por los indios?’, Hoy, 26 May 1994Google Scholar.

69 Interview with Patricio Donoso, Quito, 24 Oct. 2006.

70 ‘Un campo verde y compartido’, Hoy, 15 Feb. 1993Google Scholar.

71 Prieto, Liberalismo y temor.

72 Rustow, Dankwart, ‘Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model’, Comparative Politics, 2: 3 (1970), pp. 337–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 ‘Cuantiosas pérdidas económicas provocó el movimiento indígena’, El Telégrafo, 25 Oct. 2002Google Scholar.

74 Ignacio Pérez Arteta, ‘El levantamiento indígena visto por los hacendados’, in Ileana Almeida et al. (eds.), Indios: una reflexión sobre el levantamiento indígena de 1990 (Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala, 1990), pp. 37–60.

75 Becker, Indians and Leftists.

76 Sawyer, Suzana, Crude Chronicles: Indigenous Politics, Multinational Oil, and Neoliberalism in Ecuador (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Andrade, Democracia, p. 93.

78 Ibid., p. 215.

79 Interviews with Augusto de la Torre, 27 April 2009; Guillermo Lasso, Guayaquil, 25 June 2009; Mauricio Pozo, Quito, 4 June 2009; and Mauricio Yépez, Quito, 23 July 2009.

80 ‘PSC llama a la cordura a comunidades indias’, Expreso, 13 June 1993Google Scholar.

81 Dosh, Paul and Kligerman, Nicole, ‘Correa vs. Social Movements: Showdown in Ecuador’, NACLA Report on the Americas, 42: 5 (2009), pp. 21–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

82 Collier and Collier, Shaping the Political Arena.

83 Hale, ‘Does Multiculturalism Menace?’; Van Cott, ‘Multiculturalism versus Neoliberalism’.