Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-v64r6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-24T20:30:46.908Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Who Owns the Data in a Medical Information Commons?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021


In this paper, we explore the perspectives of expert stakeholders about who owns data in a medical information commons (MIC) and what rights and interests ought to be recognized when developing a governance structure for an MIC. We then examine the legitimacy of these claims based on legal and ethical analysis and explore an alternative framework for thinking about participants' rights and interests in an MIC.

Symposium Articles
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Davis, J.H., “President Weighs In on Data From Genes,” The New York Times, February 25, 2016, available at <> (last visited January 11, 2019). See also K.A. Mikk, H.A. Sleeper, and E.J. Topol, “The Pathway to Patient Data Ownership and Better Health,” Journal of the American Medical Association 318, no. 15 (2017): 1433-1434; L.J. Kish and E.J. Topol, “Unpatients — Why Patients Should Own their Medical Data,” Nature Biotechnology 33, no. 9 (2015): 921-924; M.A. Hall and K.A. Schulman, “Ownership of Medical Information,” Journal of the American Medical Association 301, no. 12 (2009): 1282-1284.+(last+visited+January+11,+2019).+See+also+K.A.+Mikk,+H.A.+Sleeper,+and+E.J.+Topol,+“The+Pathway+to+Patient+Data+Ownership+and+Better+Health,”+Journal+of+the+American+Medical+Association+318,+no.+15+(2017):+1433-1434;+L.J.+Kish+and+E.J.+Topol,+“Unpatients+—+Why+Patients+Should+Own+their+Medical+Data,”+Nature+Biotechnology+33,+no.+9+(2015):+921-924;+M.A.+Hall+and+K.A.+Schulman,+“Ownership+of+Medical+Information,”+Journal+of+the+American+Medical+Association+301,+no.+12+(2009):+1282-1284.>Google Scholar
For example, LunaDNA states on their home webpage “…we believe that you should always control your data, even as you contribute your health data to the advancement of science,” and their FAQs explain: “You own your data so it is completely in your control at all times.” See LunaDNA website, available at <> (last visited October 18, 2018).+(last+visited+October+18,+2018).>Google Scholar
Honoré, A.M., “Ownership,” in Guest, A.G., eds., Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961): at 107.Google Scholar
Id., at 129.Google Scholar
Alexander, G.S. and Peñalver, E.M., An Introduction to Property Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2012): at 2; B. Björkman and S.O. Hansson, “Bodily Rights and Property Rights,” Journal of Medical Ethics 32 no. 4 (2006): at 210 (citing H. Sidgwick, Elements of Politics (London: Cambridge University Press, 1891)); P.N. Ossorio, “Property and Human Bodies,” in D. Magnus, A. Caplan, and G. McGee, eds., Who Owns Life? (Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2002): at 224-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Lexmark Intern., Inc. v. Impression Prods., Inc., 816 F.3d 721, 741 (Fed. Cir. 2016). (“It has long been a familiar feature of our legal landscape that property rights in a particular thing — like the separate interests in making, selling, using, etc., an invention — are viewed as a ‘bundle’ of rights (or sticks) that can generally be transferred separately.”).Google Scholar
Ossorio, supra note 5, at 225.Google Scholar
Björkman and Hansson, supra note 5, at 210 (citing H. Sidgwick, Elements of Politics (1891)).Google Scholar
Ossorio, supra note 5, at 226.Google Scholar
Ossorio, supra note 5, at 225.Google Scholar
Hardin, G., “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science 162, no. 3859 (1968): 1243-1244.Google Scholar
Berge, E. and van Laerhoven, F., “Governing the Commons for Two Decades: A Complex Story,” International Journal of the Commons 5, no. 2 (2011): at 160-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishori, D., “Reclaiming Commons Rights: Resources, Public Ownership and the Rights of Future Generations,” The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 8, no. 2 (2014): 335, 337, 348-349.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. and Hess, C., “A Framework For Analyzing the Knowledge Commons,” in Hess, C. and Ostrom, E., eds., Understanding Knowledge as a Commons (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007): at 3-26 and 41-81, available at <> (last visited January 11, 2019).Google Scholar
Weston, B.H. and Bollier, D., Green Governance: Ecological Survival, Human Rights, and the Law of the Commons (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013): at 124.Google Scholar
Deverka, P.A., Majumder, M.A., Villanueva, A.G., Anderson, M., et al., “Creating a Data Resource: What Will It Take to Build a Medical Information Commons?” Genome Medicine 9, no. 84 (2017): 1-5, available at <> (last visited January 11, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook-Deegan, R., Majumder, M.A., and McGuire, A.L., “Introduction: Sharing Data in a Medical Information Commons,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 7-11; A.G. Villanueva, R. Cook-Deegan, B.A. Koenig, and P.A. Deverka et al., “Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 21-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollinger, J.M., Zuk, P.D., Majumder, M.A., and Versalovic, E. et al., “What is a Medical Information Commons?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 41-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, J., “Information Property: Rights and Responsibilities,” Florida Law Review 56 (2004): 135-194, at 135, 141.Google Scholar
Roberts, J.L., “Progressive Property Ownership,” Notre Dame Law Review 93, no. 1105 (2018): 1123-1124.Google Scholar
Shay, D. F., “A Window into Patient Portals: Legal and Practical Issues for Physician Practices,” in The Health Law Handbook (Gosfield, A.G., ed., 2017).Google Scholar
DeWitt, R.E., Harton, A.E., Hoffmann, W.E. Jr., Keenan, R.M. III, and Russell, M.B., Treatise On Health Care Law, no. 3 § 16.01 (M. Bender, rev. ed. 2018).Google Scholar
Health Information & the Law Project, Who Owns Medical Records: 50 State Comparison, available at <> (last visited Aug. 22, 2018).+(last+visited+Aug.+22,+2018).>Google Scholar
See DeWitt, supra note 22.Google Scholar
H. Rev. Stat. § 151:21(X) (2015).Google Scholar
Bishop Clarkson Memorial Hospital v. Reserve Life Ins. Co., 350 F.2d 1006 (8th Cir. 1965); Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. Masonic Hospital Asso., 191 F. Supp. 51 (W.D. Okla. 1961).Google Scholar
Ala. Stat. § 18.13.010(a)(2).Google Scholar
Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 10-3-1104.7(1)(a).Google Scholar
Fla. Stat. Ann. §760.40(2)(a).Google Scholar
Ga. Code Ann. § 33-54-1(1).Google Scholar
La.Stat. Ann. §22: 1023(2016).Google Scholar
Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120, 142-43, 793 P.2d 479, 493-94 (1990) (en banc).Google Scholar
Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hosp. Res. Inst., Inc., 264 F. Supp. 2d 1064, 1074-75 (S.D. Fla. 2003).Google Scholar
Washington University v. Catalona, 490 F.3d 667, 675-76 (8th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar
United States v. Kriesel, 720 F.3d 1137, 1144-47 (9th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
Amended Counterclaim at 19, Peerenboom v. Perlmutter, No. 2013-CA015257 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Apr. 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Cole v. Gene by Gene, Ltd., No. 1:14-cv-00004-SLG, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101761, at *2 (D. Alaska June 30, 2017).Google Scholar
See Evans, B.J., “Much Ado About Data Ownership,” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 25 (Fall 2011); University of Houston Law Center No. 1857986, available at <> (last visited January 11, 2019). (Noting that rights individuals enjoy under federal privacy law are strikingly similar to rights people would enjoy under a regime of property ownership); 45 C.F.R. §164.524; Privacy Act of 1974, PL 93–579 (Dec. 31, 1974), 88 Stat 1896 (codified at 5 U.S.C. § 552a). See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d). (Providing an individual right of access to data held in governmental databases, including governmentally held Medicare data); Roberts, supra note 20, at 1130-1133.Google Scholar
See J. Buchwalter, P.M. Coltoff, and C. Fuhr et al., 14 Corpus Juris Secundum Civil Rights §§ 1, 3 (June 2017 update) (Distinguishing natural rights and rights inherent in property ownership from civil rights as exemplified by the privacy rights created under federal privacy statutes and regulations).Google Scholar
Miller, F.G., “Research on Medical Records Without Informed Consent,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 3 (2008): 560-566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R.A. and Wendler, D., “Challenging the Sanctity of Donorism: Patient Tissue Providers as Payment-Worthy Contributors,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25, no. 3 (2015): 291333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
For the anti-commons, see Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S., “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research,” Science 280, no. 5364 (1998): 698701. As applied to medical information: R.A. Spinello, “Property Rights in Genetic Information,” Ethics and Information Technology 6, no. 1 (2004): 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
For a regime that allows some ongoing control, see Samuelson, P., “Privacy as Intellectual Property?” Stanford Law Review 52, no. 5 (2000): 11251173.Google Scholar
See Lipton, supra note 19.Google Scholar