Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-rqfrn Total loading time: 0.305 Render date: 2022-01-29T02:14:31.675Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 16). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. xiii+367.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2010

Hedde Zeijlstra*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
Author's address: Faculty of Humanities, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB Amsterdam, The Netherlandsh.h.zeijlstra@uva.nl

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Béjar, Susana & Řezáč, Milan. 2009. Cyclic Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40.1, 3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics (UMWPiL) 10, 3571.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 1998. Metaphony revisited. Rivista di Linguistica 10.1, 768.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 152. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robin. 1983. Quantification and syntactic theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30, 425439.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78.3, 482526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2004. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VIII, 92110.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. The Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL) 8, 234253.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2005. Contrastive specification of person on syntactic arguments. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 103137.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 1989. Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 25.1, 342356.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli, Anderssen, Jan & Yatsushiro, Katsuko. 2005. The plural is semantically unmarked. In Kepser, Stephan & Reis, Marga (eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives, 409430. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2002. The interaction of morphology and syntax in affix order. In Booij, Geert & Marle, Jaap van (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2002, 283324. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Remarks on lexical knowledge. Lingua 92.1–4, 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 16). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. xiii+367.
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 16). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. xiii+367.
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 16). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. xiii+367.
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *