Skip to main content
×
Home

Canonical gender 1

  • GREVILLE G. CORBETT (a1) and SEBASTIAN FEDDEN (a2)
Abstract

Nominal classification remains a fascinating topic but in order to make further progress we need greater clarity of definition and analysis. Taking a Canonical Typology approach, we use canonical gender as an ideal against which we can measure the actual gender systems we find in the languages of the world. Building on previous work on canonical morphosyntactic features, particularly on how they intersect with canonical parts of speech, we establish the distinctiveness of gender, reflected in the Canonical Gender Principle: In a canonical gender system, each noun has a single gender value. We develop three criteria associated with this principle, which together ensure that canonically a noun has exactly one gender value; we give examples of non-canonicity for each criterion, thus gradually building the typology. This is the essential groundwork for a comprehensive typology of nominal classification: the Canonical Typological approach allows us to tease apart clusterings of properties and to characterize individual properties with respect to a canonical ideal, rather than requiring us to treat the entire system as belonging to a single type. This approach is designed to facilitate comparisons of different noun classification systems across languages.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author’s address: Surrey Morphology Group, School of English and Languages, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK g.corbett@surrey.ac.uk
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, School of Letters, Art and Media, John Woolley Bldg A20, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia sebastian.fedden@sydney.edu.au
References
Hide All
Aikhenvald Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aksenov A. T. 1984. K probleme èkstralingvističeskoj motivacii grammatičeskoj kategorii roda [On the extralinguistic motivation of the grammatical category of gender]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1, 1425.
Apresjan Juri D. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics 12.142, 532.
Asher R. E. 1985. Tamil. London: Croom Helm. [Reprinted 1989, London: Routledge]
Audring Jenny. 2011. Gender. Oxford bibliographies online: Linguistics. http://www.oxfordbibliographiesonline.com/view/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0066.xml(accessed 4 January 2012).
Audring Jenny. 2014. Gender as a complex feature. In Paciaroni Tania, Thornton Anna M. & Loporcaro Michele (eds.), Exploring grammatical gender: Special issue of Language Sciences 43, 517.
Baerman Matthew, Brown Dunstan & Corbett Greville G.. 2005. The syntax–morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bakker Peter. 1997. A language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benni Stefano. 1976[2011]. Bar sport. Milan: Universale Economica Feltrinelli.
Birkenes Magnus Breder, Chroni Kleopatra & Fleischer Jürg. 2014. Genus- und Sexuskongruenz im Neuhochdeutschen: Ergebnisse einer Korpusuntersuchung zur narrativen Prosa des 17. bis 19. Jahrhunderts. Deutsche Sprache 42, 124.
Booij Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Booij Geert & van Marle Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 115. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Braun Friederike & Haig Geoffrey. 2010. When are German ‘girls’ feminine? How the semantics of age influences the grammar of gender agreement. In Bieswanger Markus, Motschenbacher Heiko & Mühleisen Susanne (eds.), Language in its socio-cultural context: New explorations in gendered, global and media uses, 6983. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Brown Dunstan & Chumakina Marina. 2013. What there might be and what there is: An introduction to Canonical Typology. In Brown et al. (eds.), 119.
Brown Dunstan, Chumakina Marina & Corbett Greville G. (eds.). 2013. Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown Lea & Dryer Matthew S.. 2008a. The verbs for ‘and’ in Walman, a Torricelli language of Papua New Guinea. Language 84, 528565.
Brown Lea & Dryer Matthew S.. 2008b. Diminutive as an inflectional category in Walman. Ms., University at Buffalo. linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/BrownDryerWalmanDimin.pdf (accessed 2 June 2014).
Comrie Bernard. 2005. Grammatical gender and personification. In Diskin Dorit & Shyldkrot Hava Bat-Zeev (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honour of Ruth A. Berman, 105114. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Contini-Morava Ellen & Kilarski Marcin. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 40, 263299.
Corbett Greville G. 1979. The Agreement Hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15, 203224. [Reprinted in Francis X. Katamba (ed.). 2003. Morphology: Critical concepts in linguistic, vol. 4: Morphology and syntax, 48–70. London: Routledge.]
Corbett Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett Greville G. 2007. Gender and noun classes. In Shopen Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., 241279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett Greville G. 2011. The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems. In Bobaljik Jonathan, Sauerland Uli & Nevins Andrew (eds.), Markedness and underspecification in the morphology and semantics of agreement: Special issue of Morphology 21, 445480.
Corbett Greville G. 2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett Greville G. 2013. Canonical morphosyntactic features. In Brown et al. (eds.), 4865.
Corbett Greville G. 2015a. Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91, 145193.
Corbett Greville G.2015b. Hybrid nouns and their complexity. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 287), 191–214. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Croft William. 2013. Agreement as anaphora, anaphora as coreference. In Bakker Dik & Haspelmath Martin (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 95117. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dahl Östen. 2000. Animacy and the notion of default gender. In Unterbeck Barbara, Rissanen Matti, Nevalainen Terttu & Saari Mirja (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition, vol. 1: Approaches to gender (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124), 99115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dixon R. M. W. 1982. Nominal classification. In Dixon R. M. W. (ed.), Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax, 157233. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Donohue Mark. 2001. Animacy, class and gender in Burmeso. In Pawley Andrew, Ross Malcolm & Tryon Darrell (eds.), The boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton (Pacific Linguistics 514), 97115. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Drabbe Petrus. 1955. Spraakkunst van het Marind, zuidkust Nederlands Nieuw Guinea [A grammar of Marind, south coast of Dutch New Guinea] (Studia Instituti Anthropos 11). Wien & Mödling: Missiehuis St. Gabriel.
Emeneau Murray B. 1955. Kolami: A Dravidian language (University of California Publications in Linguistics 12). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Enger Hans-Olav. 2013. Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36, 275301.
Evans Nicholas, Brown Dunstan & Corbett Greville G.. 2002. The semantics of gender in Mayali: Partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language 78.1, 111155.
Faarlund Jan Terje. 1977. Embedded clause reduction and Scandinavian gender agreement. Journal of Linguistics 13, 239257.
Fedden Sebastian. 2011. A grammar of Mian. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Grinevald Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft(ed.), 5092.
Haugen Tor Arne & Enger Hans-Olav. 2014. Scandinavian pancake constructions as a family of constructions. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1, 171196.
Heine Bernd. 1982. African noun class systems. In Seiler Hansjakob & Lehmann Christian (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, vol. 1: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene, 189216. Tübingen: Narr.
Hosokawa Komei. 1996. ‘My face amburning!’ quasi-passive, body parts, and related issues in Yawuru grammar and cultural concepts. In Chappell Hilary & McGregor William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body parts and the part–whole relation, 155192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kathol Andreas. 1999. Agreement and the syntax–morphology interface in HPSG. In Levine Robert D. & Green Georgia M. (eds.), Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar, 223274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kibrik A. E., Kodzasov S. V., Olovjannikova I. P. & Samedov D. S.. 1977. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka I: Leksika, fonetika [A structural description of Archi I: Lexis and phonetics] (Publikacii otdelenija strukturnoj i prikladnoj lingvistiki 11). Moscow: Izdatel ́stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.
Kilarski Marcin. 2013. Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Köpcke Klaus-Michael & Zubin David A.. 1984. Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen. Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte 93, 2650.
Köpcke Klaus-Michael, Panther Klaus-Uwe & Zubin David A.. 2010. Motivating grammatical and conceptual gender agreement in German. In Schmid Hans-Jörg & Handl Susanne (eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns, 171194. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Loporcaro Michele. Forthcoming. Gender. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), Oxford handbook of the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loporcaro Michele & Paciaroni Tania. 2011. Four-gender systems in Indo-European. Folia Linguistica 45.2, 389434.
Maiden Martin & Robustelli Cecilia. 2007. A reference grammar of modern Italian, 2nd edn. London: Hodder.
Massam Diane(ed.). 2012. Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mel ́čuk Igor A..2013. The notion of inflection and the expression of nominal gender in Spanish. Studies in Language 37.4, 736763.
Meyer Peter. 1994. Grammatical categories and the methodology of linguistics. Review article on W. Andries van Helden, Case and gender: Concept formation between morphology and syntax, 1993. Russian Linguistics18, 341–377.
Nübling Damaris, Busley Simone & Drenda Juliane. 2013. Dat Anna und s Eva – Neutrale Frauenrufnamen in deutschen Dialekten und im Luxemburgischen zwischen pragmatischer und semantischer Genuszuweisung. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 80.2, 152196.
Nunberg Geoffrey D. 1993. Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 143.
Nunberg Geoffrey D. 1996. Transfers of meaning. In Pustejovsky James & Boguraev Branimir (eds.), Lexical semantics: The problem of polysemy, 109132. Oxford: Clarendon.
Nunberg Geoffrey D. 2008. The pragmatics of deferred interpretation. In Horn Laurence R. & Ward Gregory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 344363. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pišković Tatjana. 2011. Gramatika roda [The grammar of gender]. Zagreb: Disput.
Pullum Geoffrey K. & Zwicky Arnold M.. 1988. The syntax–phonology interface. In Newmeyer Frederick J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 1, 255280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid Nicholas. 1997. Class and classifiers in Ngan’gityemerri. In Harvey Mark & Reid Nicholas (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, 165228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Seifart Frank. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University.
Senft Gunter. 2000a. What do we really know about nominal classification systems?In Senft (ed.), 1149.
Senft Gunter(ed.). 2000b. Systems of nominal classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Senft Gunter. 2007. Nominal classification. In Geeraerts Dirk & Cuyckens Hubert (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 676725. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shevelov G. Y. 1963. The syntax of modern literary Ukranian: The simple sentence. The Hague: Mouton.
Singer Ruth. 2010. Creativity in the use of gender agreement in Mawng: How the discourse functions of a gender system can approach those of a classifier system. Studies in Language 34, 382416.
Spencer Andrew. 2005. Towards a typology of ‘mixed categories’. In Orgun C. Orhan & Sells Peter (eds.), Morphology and the web of grammar: Essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe (Stanford Studies in Morphology and the Lexicon), 95138. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Terrill Angela. 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thornton Anna M. 2009. Constraining gender assignment rules. Language Sciences 31, 1432.
Ward Gregory. 2004. Equatives and deferred reference. Language 80, 262289.
Wechsler Stephen. 2011. Mixed agreement, the person feature, and the index/concord distinction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29, 9991031.
Wechsler Stephen. 2013. The structure of Swedish Pancakes . In Hofmeister Philip & Norcliffe Elisabeth (eds.), The core and the periphery: Data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by Ivan A. Sag. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Wegener Claudia. 2012. A grammar of Savosavo. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Wiese Heike & Maling Joan. 2005. Beers, Kaffi, and Schnaps: Different grammatical options for restaurant talk coercions in three Germanic languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17, 138.
Zaliznjak Andrej A. 1964. K voprosu o grammatičeskix kategorijax roda i oduševlennosti v sovremennom russkom jazyke [The grammatical categories of gender and animacy in modern Russian]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 4, 2540.
Zaliznjak Andrej A. 1973. O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax [Interpreting the term ‘case’ in linguistic descriptions]. In Zaliznjak Andrej A. (ed.), Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija [Problems of grammatical modelling], 5387. Moscow: Nauka. [Reprinted in Andrej A. Zaliznjak. 2002. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie: s priloženiem izbrannyx rabot po sovremennomu russkomu jazyku i obščemu jazykoznaniju [Russian nominal inflection: With a supplement of selected works on contemporary Russian and on general linguistics], 613–647. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul ́tury.]
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 351 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 551 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.