Skip to main content Accessibility help

Canonical gender 1


Nominal classification remains a fascinating topic but in order to make further progress we need greater clarity of definition and analysis. Taking a Canonical Typology approach, we use canonical gender as an ideal against which we can measure the actual gender systems we find in the languages of the world. Building on previous work on canonical morphosyntactic features, particularly on how they intersect with canonical parts of speech, we establish the distinctiveness of gender, reflected in the Canonical Gender Principle: In a canonical gender system, each noun has a single gender value. We develop three criteria associated with this principle, which together ensure that canonically a noun has exactly one gender value; we give examples of non-canonicity for each criterion, thus gradually building the typology. This is the essential groundwork for a comprehensive typology of nominal classification: the Canonical Typological approach allows us to tease apart clusterings of properties and to characterize individual properties with respect to a canonical ideal, rather than requiring us to treat the entire system as belonging to a single type. This approach is designed to facilitate comparisons of different noun classification systems across languages.

Corresponding author
Author’s address: Surrey Morphology Group, School of English and Languages, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, School of Letters, Art and Media, John Woolley Bldg A20, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Hide All
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aksenov, A. T. 1984. K probleme èkstralingvističeskoj motivacii grammatičeskoj kategorii roda [On the extralinguistic motivation of the grammatical category of gender]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1, 1425.
Apresjan, Juri D. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics 12.142, 532.
Asher, R. E. 1985. Tamil. London: Croom Helm. [Reprinted 1989, London: Routledge]
Audring, Jenny. 2011. Gender. Oxford bibliographies online: Linguistics. 4 January 2012).
Audring, Jenny. 2014. Gender as a complex feature. In Paciaroni, Tania, Thornton, Anna M. & Loporcaro, Michele (eds.), Exploring grammatical gender: Special issue of Language Sciences 43, 517.
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.. 2005. The syntax–morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bakker, Peter. 1997. A language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benni, Stefano. 1976[2011]. Bar sport. Milan: Universale Economica Feltrinelli.
Birkenes, Magnus Breder, Chroni, Kleopatra & Fleischer, Jürg. 2014. Genus- und Sexuskongruenz im Neuhochdeutschen: Ergebnisse einer Korpusuntersuchung zur narrativen Prosa des 17. bis 19. Jahrhunderts. Deutsche Sprache 42, 124.
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 115. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Braun, Friederike & Haig, Geoffrey. 2010. When are German ‘girls’ feminine? How the semantics of age influences the grammar of gender agreement. In Bieswanger, Markus, Motschenbacher, Heiko & Mühleisen, Susanne (eds.), Language in its socio-cultural context: New explorations in gendered, global and media uses, 6983. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
Brown, Dunstan & Chumakina, Marina. 2013. What there might be and what there is: An introduction to Canonical Typology. In Brown et al. (eds.), 119.
Brown, Dunstan, Chumakina, Marina & Corbett, Greville G. (eds.). 2013. Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Lea & Dryer, Matthew S.. 2008a. The verbs for ‘and’ in Walman, a Torricelli language of Papua New Guinea. Language 84, 528565.
Brown, Lea & Dryer, Matthew S.. 2008b. Diminutive as an inflectional category in Walman. Ms., University at Buffalo. (accessed 2 June 2014).
Comrie, Bernard. 2005. Grammatical gender and personification. In Diskin, Dorit & Shyldkrot, Hava Bat-Zeev (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honour of Ruth A. Berman, 105114. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Contini-Morava, Ellen & Kilarski, Marcin. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 40, 263299.
Corbett, Greville G. 1979. The Agreement Hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15, 203224. [Reprinted in Francis X. Katamba (ed.). 2003. Morphology: Critical concepts in linguistic, vol. 4: Morphology and syntax, 48–70. London: Routledge.]
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Gender and noun classes. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 1: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., 241279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2011. The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems. In Bobaljik, Jonathan, Sauerland, Uli & Nevins, Andrew (eds.), Markedness and underspecification in the morphology and semantics of agreement: Special issue of Morphology 21, 445480.
Corbett, Greville G. 2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2013. Canonical morphosyntactic features. In Brown et al. (eds.), 4865.
Corbett, Greville G. 2015a. Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91, 145193.
Corbett, Greville G.2015b. Hybrid nouns and their complexity. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 287), 191–214. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Croft, William. 2013. Agreement as anaphora, anaphora as coreference. In Bakker, Dik & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 95117. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Animacy and the notion of default gender. In Unterbeck, Barbara, Rissanen, Matti, Nevalainen, Terttu & Saari, Mirja (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition, vol. 1: Approaches to gender (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 124), 99115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Nominal classification. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax, 157233. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Donohue, Mark. 2001. Animacy, class and gender in Burmeso. In Pawley, Andrew, Ross, Malcolm & Tryon, Darrell (eds.), The boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton (Pacific Linguistics 514), 97115. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Drabbe, Petrus. 1955. Spraakkunst van het Marind, zuidkust Nederlands Nieuw Guinea [A grammar of Marind, south coast of Dutch New Guinea] (Studia Instituti Anthropos 11). Wien & Mödling: Missiehuis St. Gabriel.
Emeneau, Murray B. 1955. Kolami: A Dravidian language (University of California Publications in Linguistics 12). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2013. Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36, 275301.
Evans, Nicholas, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.. 2002. The semantics of gender in Mayali: Partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language 78.1, 111155.
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1977. Embedded clause reduction and Scandinavian gender agreement. Journal of Linguistics 13, 239257.
Fedden, Sebastian. 2011. A grammar of Mian. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft(ed.), 5092.
Haugen, Tor Arne & Enger, Hans-Olav. 2014. Scandinavian pancake constructions as a family of constructions. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1, 171196.
Heine, Bernd. 1982. African noun class systems. In Seiler, Hansjakob & Lehmann, Christian (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, vol. 1: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene, 189216. Tübingen: Narr.
Hosokawa, Komei. 1996. ‘My face amburning!’ quasi-passive, body parts, and related issues in Yawuru grammar and cultural concepts. In Chappell, Hilary & McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body parts and the part–whole relation, 155192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kathol, Andreas. 1999. Agreement and the syntax–morphology interface in HPSG. In Levine, Robert D. & Green, Georgia M. (eds.), Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar, 223274. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kibrik, A. E., Kodzasov, S. V., Olovjannikova, I. P. & Samedov, D. S.. 1977. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija arčinskogo jazyka I: Leksika, fonetika [A structural description of Archi I: Lexis and phonetics] (Publikacii otdelenija strukturnoj i prikladnoj lingvistiki 11). Moscow: Izdatel ́stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.
Kilarski, Marcin. 2013. Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael & Zubin, David A.. 1984. Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen. Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte 93, 2650.
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael, Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Zubin, David A.. 2010. Motivating grammatical and conceptual gender agreement in German. In Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Handl, Susanne (eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns, 171194. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Loporcaro, Michele. Forthcoming. Gender. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), Oxford handbook of the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loporcaro, Michele & Paciaroni, Tania. 2011. Four-gender systems in Indo-European. Folia Linguistica 45.2, 389434.
Maiden, Martin & Robustelli, Cecilia. 2007. A reference grammar of modern Italian, 2nd edn. London: Hodder.
Massam, Diane(ed.). 2012. Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mel ́čuk, Igor A..2013. The notion of inflection and the expression of nominal gender in Spanish. Studies in Language 37.4, 736763.
Meyer, Peter. 1994. Grammatical categories and the methodology of linguistics. Review article on W. Andries van Helden, Case and gender: Concept formation between morphology and syntax, 1993. Russian Linguistics18, 341–377.
Nübling, Damaris, Busley, Simone & Drenda, Juliane. 2013. Dat Anna und s Eva – Neutrale Frauenrufnamen in deutschen Dialekten und im Luxemburgischen zwischen pragmatischer und semantischer Genuszuweisung. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 80.2, 152196.
Nunberg, Geoffrey D. 1993. Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 143.
Nunberg, Geoffrey D. 1996. Transfers of meaning. In Pustejovsky, James & Boguraev, Branimir (eds.), Lexical semantics: The problem of polysemy, 109132. Oxford: Clarendon.
Nunberg, Geoffrey D. 2008. The pragmatics of deferred interpretation. In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 344363. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pišković, Tatjana. 2011. Gramatika roda [The grammar of gender]. Zagreb: Disput.
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Zwicky, Arnold M.. 1988. The syntax–phonology interface. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 1, 255280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, Nicholas. 1997. Class and classifiers in Ngan’gityemerri. In Harvey, Mark & Reid, Nicholas (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, 165228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Seifart, Frank. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University.
Senft, Gunter. 2000a. What do we really know about nominal classification systems?In Senft (ed.), 1149.
Senft, Gunter(ed.). 2000b. Systems of nominal classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Senft, Gunter. 2007. Nominal classification. In Geeraerts, Dirk & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 676725. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shevelov, G. Y. 1963. The syntax of modern literary Ukranian: The simple sentence. The Hague: Mouton.
Singer, Ruth. 2010. Creativity in the use of gender agreement in Mawng: How the discourse functions of a gender system can approach those of a classifier system. Studies in Language 34, 382416.
Spencer, Andrew. 2005. Towards a typology of ‘mixed categories’. In Orgun, C. Orhan & Sells, Peter (eds.), Morphology and the web of grammar: Essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe (Stanford Studies in Morphology and the Lexicon), 95138. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Terrill, Angela. 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thornton, Anna M. 2009. Constraining gender assignment rules. Language Sciences 31, 1432.
Ward, Gregory. 2004. Equatives and deferred reference. Language 80, 262289.
Wechsler, Stephen. 2011. Mixed agreement, the person feature, and the index/concord distinction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29, 9991031.
Wechsler, Stephen. 2013. The structure of Swedish Pancakes . In Hofmeister, Philip & Norcliffe, Elisabeth (eds.), The core and the periphery: Data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by Ivan A. Sag. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Wegener, Claudia. 2012. A grammar of Savosavo. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Wiese, Heike & Maling, Joan. 2005. Beers, Kaffi, and Schnaps: Different grammatical options for restaurant talk coercions in three Germanic languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17, 138.
Zaliznjak, Andrej A. 1964. K voprosu o grammatičeskix kategorijax roda i oduševlennosti v sovremennom russkom jazyke [The grammatical categories of gender and animacy in modern Russian]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 4, 2540.
Zaliznjak, Andrej A. 1973. O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax [Interpreting the term ‘case’ in linguistic descriptions]. In Zaliznjak, Andrej A. (ed.), Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija [Problems of grammatical modelling], 5387. Moscow: Nauka. [Reprinted in Andrej A. Zaliznjak. 2002. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie: s priloženiem izbrannyx rabot po sovremennomu russkomu jazyku i obščemu jazykoznaniju [Russian nominal inflection: With a supplement of selected works on contemporary Russian and on general linguistics], 613–647. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul ́tury.]
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed