Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kasai, Hironobu 2016. Coordinated wh-questions in Japanese. Lingua,


    Seraku, Tohru and Ohtani, Akira 2016. Computational and Cognitive Approaches to Narratology.


    Truckenbrodt, Hubert 2016. Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms.


    Cheung, Lawrence Yam-Leung 2015. Bi-clausal sluicing approach to dislocation copying in Cantonese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 227.


    Kim, Lan 2015. Asymmetric ditransitive constructions: Evidence from Korean. Lingua, Vol. 165, p. 28.


    Narita, Hiroki 2014. Endocentric Structuring of Projection-free Syntax. Vol. 218, Issue. ,

    Takita, Kensuke 2014. Pseudo-right dislocation, the bare-topic construction, and hanging topic constructions. Lingua, Vol. 140, p. 137.


    Abe, Jun 2012. Scrambling and operator movement. Lingua, Vol. 122, Issue. 1, p. 66.


    Sugisaki, Koji 2008. Early Acquisition of Basic Word Order in Japanese. Language Acquisition, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 183.


    ×

Right-Dislocation as scrambling

  • HIDEKAZU TANAKA (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226701001049
  • Published online: 01 February 2002
Abstract

The present paper shows that Right-Dislocation (RD) in Japanese shares a number of characteristics with scrambling, but nonetheless cannot be identified as rightward scrambling. The proposed solution to this apparent contradiction is that there is no direct syntactic movement of the right-dislocated phrase. Rather, the right-dislocated phrase is a remnant of an extra clause which is deleted (or sluiced) after scrambling. It is therefore concluded that RD involves leftward movement (scrambling) and that its rightward effect is only apparent. The proposed analysis is supported by a number of facts that have not previously been reported, including the distribution of adverbs, pronominal coreference, anaphor binding, idiom interpretations and wh-questions. The proposed analysis is also consistent with Kayne’s (1994) proposal that there are no rightward movement processes in syntax.

Copyright
Corresponding author
ALL, University of Minnesota, 453 Folwell Hall, 9 Pleasant Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A. E-mail: tanak005@umn.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
This paper is a substantially revised version of Tanaka (1996). I would like to express my gratitude to Mika Kizu and Journal of Linguistics editors and anonymous referees. The author alone is responsible for whatever errors may be remaining.
Footnotes
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×