Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 26
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Babineau, Mireille and Shi, Rushen 2016. Development of Liaison Representation and its Top-Down Influence on Word Processing in Infants. Language Learning and Development, p. 1.

    McPherson, Laura and Heath, Jeffrey 2016. Phrasal grammatical tone in the Dogon languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 593.

    MEINSCHAEFER, JUDITH BONIFER, SVEN and FRISCH, CHRISTINE 2015. Variable and invariable liaison in a corpus of spoken French. Journal of French Language Studies, Vol. 25, Issue. 03, p. 367.

    PUSTKA, ELISSA 2015. L’écrit avant l’écriture: la liaison dans les livres audio pour enfants. Journal of French Language Studies, p. 1.

    Chevrot, Jean-Pierre Dugua, Céline Harnois-Delpiano, Mylène Siccardi, Anne and Spinelli, Elsa 2013. Liaison acquisition: debates, critical issues, future research. Language Sciences, Vol. 39, p. 83.

    Côté, Marie-Hélène 2013. Understanding cohesion in French liaison. Language Sciences, Vol. 39, p. 156.

    NICOLADIS, ELENA and PARADIS, JOHANNE 2011. Learning to liaise and elide comme il faut: evidence from bilingual children*. Journal of Child Language, Vol. 38, Issue. 04, p. 701.

    Dugua, Céline Spinelli, Elsa Chevrot, Jean-Pierre and Fayol, Michel 2009. Usage-based account of the acquisition of liaison: Evidence from sensitivity to the singular/plural orientation of nouns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 102, Issue. 3, p. 342.

    DURAND, JACQUES and LYCHE, CHANTAL 2008. French liaison in the light of corpus data. Journal of French Language Studies, Vol. 18, Issue. 01,

    Bybee, Joan 2005. La liaison : effets de fréquence et constructions. Langages, Vol. 158, Issue. 2, p. 24.

    Côté, Marie-Hélène 2005. Le statut lexical des consonnes de liaison. Langages, Vol. 158, Issue. 2, p. 66.

    Di Cristo, Albert 1999. Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: première partie. Journal of French Language Studies, Vol. 9, Issue. 02, p. 143.

    Lyche, Chantal 1999. Le mot phonologique en cadien. Journal of French Language Studies, Vol. 9, Issue. 01, p. 25.

    Dufresne, Monique 1995. Étude diachronique de la cliticisation des pronoms sujets à partir du français médiéval. Revue québécoise de linguistique, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 83.

    Lyche, Chantal and Girard, Francine 1995. Le mot retrouvé. Lingua, Vol. 95, Issue. 1-3, p. 205.

    Paradis, Carole and El Fenne, Fatimazohra 1995. French verbal inflection revisited: Constraints, repairs and floating consonants. Lingua, Vol. 95, Issue. 1-3, p. 169.

    1994. Linguistic perspectives on the romance languages. Selected papers from the 21st linguistic symposium on romance languages (LSRL XXI) Santa Barbara, California, 21–24 February 1991. Lingua, Vol. 94, Issue. 2-3, p. 177.

    Durand, Jacques 1993. La phonologie multidimensionnelle moderne et la description du français. Journal of French Language Studies, Vol. 3, Issue. 02, p. 197.

    Jarema, Gonia and Kehayia, Eva 1992. Impairment of inflectional morphology and lexical storage. Brain and Language, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 541.

    Paradis, Carole and El Fenne, Fatimazohra 1992. L’alternance C/Ø des verbes français : une analyse par contraintes et stratégies de réparation. Revue québécoise de linguistique, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 107.


The syntactic bases for French liaison

  • Yves-Charles Morin (a1) and Jonathan D. Kaye (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 28 November 2008

Recent transformational analyses of liaison in French have postulated in one form or another a simple general syntactic basis for this phenomenon (Schane, 1968; Selkirk, 1974; Klausenburger, 1978). This contrasts with the traditional approach in which all the syntactic contexts in which liaison is obligatory, impossible, or depends on stylistic factors are painstakingly listed (Fouché, 1959; Delattre, 1947, 1955, 1956). This may appear to be due to the fact that the traditional approach lacked an appropriate syntactic theory which would unify the apparently unmotivated series of contexts in which liaison capriciously wandered. Working within the framework of the Syntactic theory, Selkirk (1974) was able to discover a small set of simple rules to account for a wide array of previously recalcitrant data. This success has sometimes been taken as an argument for the superiority of the syntactic theory, cf. Jackendoff (1977).

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Klausenburger (1970). French prosodics and phonotactics. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *