Skip to main content

Understanding comparative alternation in y-adjectives: What else might we need? 1


This paper investigates the contribution of lexical spreads (or type counts) of English comparative more and -er constructions to an understanding of comparative alternation in the $y$ -adjectives, that is adjectives ending in an orthographic ${<}\text{y}>$ and an /i/ sound, e.g. lazy. Comparative $y$ -adjective constructions from seven corpora of stage plays spanning from the 17th to the 20th century were analysed with mixed-effects modelling and correlations drawn between the comparatives of $y$ -adjectives and those of other adjectives. The findings indicate that while morphological complexity in $y$ -adjectives biases them towards more, more occurrences with $y$ -adjectives may also be related to the lexical spread of more in disyllabic adjectives that are not $y$ -ones. The findings suggest moreover that predictions of comparative forms based on the syntactic positioning of $y$ -adjectives and the [±voiced] nature of their penultimate segments may make sense only with respect to the lexical spread of more in other English adjectives. To understand why $y$ -adjectives seem divided between -er regularisation and adherence to the trend in English comparisons of a more bias, this paper proposes a need to supplement accounts of comparative alternation focused on the characteristics of $y$ -adjectives with considerations related to the lexical spread of comparative constructions.

Corresponding author
Author’s address: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, NIE2-02-11, Singapore 637616, Singapore;
Hide All

I would like to thank Laurie Bauer, Paul Warren and three anonymous referees of Journal of Linguistics for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Hide All
Anthony, Laurence. 2011. Antconc: A Free Corpus Analysis Toolkit for Concordancing and Text Analysis. Tokyo: Center for English Language Education in Science and Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University. 15 April 2014).
Barber, Charles. 1964. Linguistic change in present-day English. Edinburgh & London: Oliver and Boyd.
Barber, Charles. 1997. Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, Walker, Steven, Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen, Singmann, Henrik, Dai, Bin, Grothendieck, Gabor & Green, Peter. 2015. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-9. (accessed 18 April 2014).
Bauer, Laurie. 1994. Watching English change: An introduction to the study of linguistic change in standard Englishes in the twentieth century. London & New York: Longman.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Brook, George Leslie. 1973. Varieties of English. London: Macmillan.
Brown, Cath. 2011. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Bio Factsheet, 144, 2 pp.–144–spearman-s-rank-correlation-coefficient.html(accessed 15 April 2014).
Bybee, Joan. 2007a. Introduction. In Bybee(ed.), 522.
Bybee, Joan(ed.). 2007b. Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. & Newman, Jean E.. 2007. Are stem changes as natural as affixes? In Bybee (ed.), 148166.
Callister, Rick Mc.1998. Disc: Recent change in English. Linguist List 9.768. (accessed 27 November 2016).
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide, spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheung, Lawrence & Zhang, Longtu. 2016. Determinants of the synthetic-analytic variation across English comparatives and superlatives. English Language & Linguistics 20.3, 559583.
Clark, Megan J. & Randal, John A.. 2011. A first course in applied statistics, 2nd edn. Auckland: Pearson.
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2014. Functional partitioning and possible limits on variability: A view of adjective comparison from the vernacular. Journal of English Linguistics 42.3, 218244.
Davies, Mark. 2004–. BYU–BNC (based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). 25 April 2013).
Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. IV: 1776–1997, 92329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
González-Díaz, Victorina. 2008. English adjective comparison: A historical perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Hay, Jennifer. 2001. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39.6, 10411070.
Hilpert, Martin. 2008. The English comparative: Language structure and language use. English Language & Linguistics 12.3, 395417.
IBM Corporation. 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics. New York: IBM Corporation.
Jespersen, Otto. 1949. A modern English of grammar on historical principles, part VII: Syntax. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Johnson, Samuel. 1755. A dictionary of the English language in which the words are deduced from their originals, and illustrated in their different significations by examples from the best writers. London: J. F. & C. Rivington.
Kluender, Keith R., Diehl, Randy L. & Wright, Beverly A.. 1988. Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory experiment. Journal of Phonetics 16.2, 153169.
Kruisinga, E. 1932. A handbook of present-day English, part II: English accidence and syntax 3, 5th edn. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
Kytö, Merja & Romaine, Suzanne. 1997. Competing forms of adjective comparison in Modern English: What could be more quicker and easier and more effective? In Nevalainen & Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), 329352.
Leech, Geoffrey & Culpeper, Jonathan. 1997. The comparison of adjectives in recent British English. In Nevalainen & Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), 353373.
Leggatt, Alexander. 1998. English stage comedy, 1490–1990: Five centuries of a genre. London & New York: Routledge.
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lighter, Jonathan. 2006. Funner and funnest. Linguist List. 27 November 2016).
Lindquist, Hans. 2000. Livelier or more lively? Syntactic and contextual factors influencing the comparison of disyllabic adjectives. In Kirk, John M. (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 125132. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Marchman, Virginia A. & Bates, Elizabeth. 1994. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21.2, 339366.
Matthews, P. H. 1970. Recent developments in morphology. In Lyons, John (ed.), New horizons in linguistics, 96114. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Mondorf, Britta. 2003. Support for more-support. In Rohdenburg, Günter & Mondorf, Britta (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 251304. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support: The role of processing constraints on the choice between synthetic and analytic comparative forms. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
N.A. 1996. Internet Archive. 8 October 2013).
Nesfield, John C. 1898. English grammar, past and present. London: Macmillan.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena (eds.). 1997. To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Néopilologique.
OED Online. n.d. Oxford English Dictionary. 12 February 2013).
Palmer, Frank, Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. Inflectional morphology and related matters. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum et al.  The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 1565–1620. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Proquest. 1996–2013. Literature Online (available from the Victoria University of Wellington library online database). 1 March 2013).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
R Core Team. 2014. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 1 April 2014).
Rohr, Anny. 1929. Dei Steigerung des neuenglischen Eigenschaftswortes im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert mit Ausblicken auf den Sprachgebrauch der Gegenwart. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Giessen.
Schibsbye, Knud. 1965. A Modern English grammar. London: Oxford University Press.
Smith, George J. 1916. Longmans’ English grammar. New York: Longmans, Green & Company.
Stewart, Thomas W. 2016. Contemporary morphological theories: A user’s guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sweet, Henry. 1900. A new English grammar, logical and historical, part I: Introduction, phonology, and accidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zandvoort, R. W. 1977. A handbook of English grammar. London: Longman.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 355 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th November 2017 - 15th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.