Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-6mkhv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-05T01:18:58.496Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micro/nanomechanical and tribological characterization of ultrathin amorphous carbon coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Xiaodong Li  and
Bharat Bhushan
Xiaodong Li
Affiliation:
Computer Microtribology and Contamination Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1107
Bharat Bhushan
Affiliation:
Computer Microtribology and Contamination Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1107
Get access

Abstract

Micro/nanomechanical and tribological characterization of ultrathin amorphous carbon coatings, deposited by filtered cathodic arc (FCA), direct ion beam (IB), electron cyclotron resonance plasma chemical vapor deposition (ECR-CVD), and sputter (SP) deposition processes on Si substrate have been conducted using a nanoindenter with a nanoscratch attachment and an accelerated ball-on-flat tribometer. Coating thicknesses of 20, 10, 5 nm and, for the first time, 3.5 nm coatings have been investigated. It was found the FCA coating exhibits the highest hardness and elastic modulus, followed by the ECR-CVD, IB, and SP coatings. In general, the thicker coatings exhibited better scratch/wear performance than the thinner coatings due to their better load-carrying capacity as compared to the thinner coatings. At 20 nm, the FCA and ECR-CVD coatings show the best scratch and wear resistance, while the IB and ECR-CVD coatings show the best scratch and wear resistance at 10 nm. Five nanometer thick coatings show reasonable scratch and wear resistance, while 3.5 nm thick coatings show extremely low load-carrying capacity and poor scratch and wear resistance. It appears that the 3.5 nm coatings studied are unfeasible for scratch and wear resistance applications as of now.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , June 1999 , pp. 2328 - 2337
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lettington, A. H., Carbon 36, 555–560 (1998).Google Scholar
2.Gupta, B. K. and Bhushan, B., Wear 190, 110–122 (1995).Google Scholar
3.Bhushan, B. and Koinkar, V. N., Surf. Coat. Technol. 76–77, 655–669 (1995).Google Scholar
4.Patton, S. T. and Bhushan, B., Wear 202, 99–109 (1996).Google Scholar
5.Bhushan, B., Tribology and Mechanics of Magnetic Storage Devices, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
6.Bhushan, B., Proc. 9th Annual Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (IEEE, New York, 1996), pp. 91–98.Google Scholar
7.Tribology Issues and Opportunities in MEMS, edited by Bhushan, B. (Kluwer Academic Pub., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998).Google Scholar
8.Bhushan, B., Handbook of Micro/Nanotribology, 2nd ed. (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1999).Google Scholar
9.Gupta, B. K. and Bhushan, B., Thin Solid Films 270, 391–398 (1995).Google Scholar
10.Li, X. and Bhushan, B., Wear 220, 51–58 (1998).Google Scholar
11.Suzuki, J. and Okada, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1218–1220 (1995).Google Scholar
12.Bull, S. J., Diam. Relat. Mater. 4, 827–836 (1995).Google Scholar
13.Bhushan, B., Gupta, B. K., and Azarian, M., Wear 181–183, 743–758 (1995).Google Scholar
14.Holmberg, K. and Matthews, A., Coatings Tribology: Properties, Techniques and Applications in Surface Engineering (Elsevier, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
15.Bhushan, B. and Gupta, B. K., Handbook of Tribology: Materials, Coatings and Surface Treatments (Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL, 1997).Google Scholar