Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-857cdc78dc-2sq9z Total loading time: 0.351 Render date: 2022-05-13T11:56:39.588Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

The changing religious composition of Nigeria: causes and implications of demographic divergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Marcin Stonawski*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Department of Sociology and Human Geography, P.O. Box 1096 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway and Cracow University of Economics, Department of Demography, Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Cracow, Poland
Michaela Potančoková*
Affiliation:
Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (IIASA, VID/OAW, WU), Vienna Institute of Demography, Welthandelsplatz 2, 1020 Vienna, Austria
Matthew Cantele*
Affiliation:
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Ecosystems Services and Management, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Vegard Skirbekk*
Affiliation:
Columbia University, Columbia Aging Centre, 722 W. 168th Street, NY 1003, New York, USA

Abstract

At nearly 170 million inhabitants, Nigeria is Africa's most populous country by twofold and fertility levels remain higher than most other sub-Saharan African nations. Throughout the last several decades, the fertility gap between Christians and Muslims has widened with significant political implications for a nascent democracy. Where the Demographic Health Survey (DHS) survey of 1990 revealed a non-significant difference of 0·3 children, this figure had increased to 2·3 children by 2013. As the total fertility rate (TFR) of Christians decreased significantly from 6·1 to 4·5 children per woman between 1990 and 2013, the TFR of Muslims increased from 6·4 to 6·8 children per woman. The timing of this divergence coincides with the formal institutionalization of Sharia law in 1999. We examine the role of religion on education, contraception and family behaviour. Finally, we touch upon the implications for population growth and the religious composition of Nigeria in the coming decades.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, G.J. 2013. ‘Estimating global migration flow tables using place of birth data’, Demographic Research 28, 18: 505–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adebowale, S.A., Fagbamigbe, F.A. & Bamgboye, E.A.. 2011. ‘Contraceptive use: implication for completed fertility, parity progression and maternal nutritional status in Nigeria’, African Journal of Reproductive Health 15, 4: 60–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Adiri, F., Ibrahim, H.I., Ajayi, V., Sulayman, H.U., Yafeh, A.M. & Ejembi, C.L.. 2010. ‘Fertility behaviour of men and women in three communities in Kaduna State, Nigeria’, African Journal of Reproductive Health 14, 3s1: 97105.Google Scholar
Bankole, A. and Singh, S.. 1998. ‘Couples’ fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: hearing the man's voice’, International Family Planning Perspectives 24, 1: 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, G. and Ricardo, C.. 2005. Young Men and the Construction of Masculinity in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for HIV/AIDS, conflict, and violence. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Bongaarts, J. 1978. ‘A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility’, Population and Development Review 4, 1: 105–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaarts, J. 2003. ‘Completing the fertility transition in the developing world: the role of educational differences and fertility preferences’, Population Studies 57, 3: 321–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongaarts, J. & Casterline, J.. 2013. ‘Fertility transition: is sub-Saharan Africa different?’, Population and Development Review 38, s1: 153–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, P. 2012. ‘Faith on the Move: The Religious Affiliation of International Migrants’. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. http://features.pewforum.org/religious-migration/Faithonthemove.pdf.Google Scholar
Csapo, M. 1981. ‘Religious, social and economic factors hindering the education of girls in northern Nigeria’, Comparative Education 17, 3: 311–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duze, M.C. and Mohammed, I.Z.. 2007. ‘Male knowledge, attitude, and family planning practices in northern Nigeria’, African Journal of Reproductive Health 10, 3: 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ejelmi, C.L., Dahiru, T. & Aliyu, A.A.. 2015. Contextual Factors Influencing Modern Contraceptive Use in Nigeria (DHS Working Paper No. 120).Google Scholar
Ezeh, A.C., Isiugo-Abanihe, U.C., Tolnay, S.E., Woodcock, A., Stenner, K., Ingham, R., Reichert, C. et al. 1993. ‘The influence of spouses over each other's contraceptive attitudes in Ghana’, Studies in Family Planning 24, 3: 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasona, M.J. and Omojola, A.S.. 2005. ‘Climate change, human security and communal clashes in Nigeria’, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Human Security and Climate Change, Asker, Oslo, 21–23 June 2005.Google Scholar
Goujon, A., É.C., Malenfant & Skirbekk, V.. 2013. Towards a Catholic North America? In Brunn, S. D., ed. The Changing World Religion Map. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hackett, C., Connor, P., Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Potančoková, M. & Abel, G.. 2015a. The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010–2050. Washington, DC: PEW Research Center.Google Scholar
Hackett, C., Stonawski, M., Potančoková, M., Grim, B.J. & Skirbekk, V.. 2015b. ‘The future size of religiously affiliated and unaffiliated populations’, Demographic Research 32, 27: 829–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isa, M.K. 2010. ‘Militant Islamic groups in northern Nigeria’, in Okumu, W. & Ikelegbe, A., eds. Militias, Rebels and Islamic Militants: human security and state crises in Africa. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies, 313–40.Google Scholar
Isiugo-Abanihe, U.C. 1994. ‘Reproductive motivation and family-size preferences among Nigerian men’, Studies in Family Planning 25, 3: 149–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izugbara, C.O. and Ezeh, A.C.. 2010. ‘Women and high fertility in Islamic Northern Nigeria’, Studies in Family Planning 41, 3: 193204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izugbara, C., Ibisomi, L., Ezeh, A.C. & Mandara, M.. 2010. ‘Gendered interests and poor spousal contraceptive communication in Islamic northern Nigeria’, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 36, 4: 219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Hanks, J. 2007. ‘Natural intentions: fertility decline in the African demographic and health surveys’, American Journal of Sociology 112, 4: 1008–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Hanks, J., Caldwell, J., Dennis, S., Guyer, J., Miyazaki, H., Notermans, C., Randall, S. et al. 2005. ‘When the future decides: uncertainty and intentional action in contemporary Cameroon’, Current Anthropology 46, 3: 363–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzner, K. 2002. The Languages of the World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kazeem, A., Jensen, L. & Stokes, C.S.. 2010. ‘School attendance in Nigeria: understanding the impact and intersection of gender, urban-rural residence, and socioeconomic status’, Comparative Education Review 54, 2: 295319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendhammer, B. 2013. ‘The Sharia controversy in northern Nigeria and the politics of Islamic law in new and uncertain democracies’, Comparative Politics 45, 3: 291311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, E.S. & McClendon, G.H.. 2013. ‘The ethnicity–policy preference link in sub-Saharan Africa’, Comparative Political Studies 46, 5: 574602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincove, J.A. 2009. ‘Determinants of schooling for boys and girls in Nigeria under a policy of free primary education’, Economics of Education Review 28, 4: 474–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, L. 2009. ‘Comparative trends in ethno-regional inequalities in Ghana and Nigeria: evidence from demographic and health surveys’, Working Paper 72. Oxford: CRISE.Google Scholar
May, C. and Finch, T.. 2009. ‘Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory’, Sociology 43, 3: 535–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazrui, A.A. 1994. ‘Islamic doctrine and the politics of induced fertility change: an African perspective’, in Finkle, J.L. & McIntosh, C.A., eds. The New Politics of Population: conflict and consensus in family planning. New York, NY: Population Council, 121–34.Google Scholar
Mi, I. 1987. Population Censuses of Nigeria from Colonial Times: an evaluation of their coverage and accuracy [online]. Retrieved from http://www.popline.org/node/376806.Google Scholar
Nmehielle, V.O.O. 2004. ‘Sharia law in the northern states of Nigeria: to implement or not to implement, the constitutionality is the question’, Human Rights Quarterly 26, 3: 730–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oba, A.A. 2002. ‘Islamic law as customary law: the changing perspective in Nigeria’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51, 4: 817–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogunjuyigbe, P.O. & Fadeyi, A.O.. 2002. ‘Problems of gender differentials in literacy and enrolment among the Yorubas of South- west Nigeria’, Journal of Social Sciences 6, 2: 113–20.Google Scholar
Omran, A.-R. 2012. Family Planning in the Legacy of Islam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ostien, P. & Dekker, A.. 2010. ‘Sharia and national law in Nigeria’, in Otto, J.M., ed. Sharia Incorporated: a comparative overview of the legal systems of twelve Muslim countries in past and present. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 553612.Google Scholar
PEW. 2012. The Global Religious Landscape. A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Major Religious Groups as of 2010. [online]. Washington, DC: PEW Forum on Religion and Public Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/The-Future-of-the-Global-Muslim-Population.aspx.Google Scholar
Philipov, D. 1981. ‘Multistate population projections’, in Rogers, A., ed. Advances in Multiregional Demography. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
Preston, S.H., Heuveline, P. & Guillot, M.. 2001. Demography: measuring and modeling population processes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rehman, J. 2007. ‘The sharia, Islamic family laws and international human rights law: examining the theory and practice of polygamy and talaq’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21, 1: 108–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retherford, R.D. & Thapa, S.. 2004. ‘Recent trends and components of change in fertility in Nepal’, Journal of Biosocial Science 36, 6: 709–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, A. 1995. Multiregional Demography: principles methods and extensions. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Roudi-Fahimi, F. 2004. Islam and family planning. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Samir, K.C., Barakat, B., Goujon, A., Skirbekk, V., Sanderson, W.C. & Lutz, W.. 2010. ‘Projection of populations by level of educational attainment, age, and sex for 120 countries for 2005–2050’, Demographic Research 22: 383472.Google Scholar
Sayne, A. 2011. Climate Change Adaptation and Conflict in Nigeria. USIP Special Report No. 274. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Schoumaker, B. 2013. ‘A Stata module for computing fertility rates and TFRs from birth histories: tfr2.’, Demographic Research 28: 1093–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skirbekk, V. 2008. ‘Fertility trends by social status’, Demographic Research 18, 5: 145–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Kaufmann, E. & Goujon, A.. 2015. ‘The end of secularisation through demography? Projections of Spanish religiosity’, Journal of Contemporary Religion 30, 1: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations 2011. World Population Prospects. New York, NY: United Nations Population Division.Google Scholar
Warner, E. 2004. ‘Behind the wedding veil: child marriage as a form of trafficking in girls’, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 12, 2: 233–71.Google Scholar
Westoff, C.F., Pullum, T., Adamchak, S.E., Hill, K., Stupp, P., Bertrand, J.T., Brown, M.T. et al. 1992. ‘Age at marriage age at first birth and fertility in Africa.’, Journal of Biosocial Science 24, 3: 335–45.Google Scholar
12
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The changing religious composition of Nigeria: causes and implications of demographic divergence
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The changing religious composition of Nigeria: causes and implications of demographic divergence
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The changing religious composition of Nigeria: causes and implications of demographic divergence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *