Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:18:50.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The End of an Era: the Rise and Fall of G.D.R. Aid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Jude Howell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The reunification of Germany on 3 October 1990 marked the end not only of a socialist experiment but also of an alternative source of aid to developing countries as far apart as Vietnam, Cuba, and Mozambique. Whilst the Soviet Union was the major socialist provider of assistance, the former German Democratic Republic (G.D.R.) played a not insignificant rôle. Yet how great was the loss to the developing world when the G.D.R. rapidly disintegrated? What was distinctive about its aid compared with that of capitalist donors? What happened to the projects, experts, overseas students, and foreign workers once Germany reunified?

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 305 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, Schulz, Brigitte and Hansen, William, ‘Aid or Imperialism? West Germany in Sub-Saharan Africa’, in The Journal of Modern African Studies (Cambridge), 22, 2, 06 1984, pp. 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 The category of ‘countries with a socialist orientation’ has been fluid. Whilst in the 1960s there was only a handful which earned this title, by the 1980s they numbered around 20. Similarly, the G.D.R.'s conceptualisation of national liberation movements changed over time. See Spanger, Hans-Joachim and Brock, Lothar, Die beiden deutschen Staaten in der dritten Welt–die Entwicklungspolitik der DDR –eine Herausforderung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland? (Opladen, 1987), pp. 130–2 and 187–90.Google Scholar

3 For example, the G.D.R. cut aid to Ghana when Nkrumah was overthrown in 1966 and to Chile after the Allende coup in 1973. See Göschel, Hans ‘Was kann die DDR in die entwicklungspolitische Diskussion in Deutschland einbringen?’, in Engels, Benno (ed.), ‘Das vereinte Deutschland in der Weltwirtschaft: Beiträge zu einer deutsch-deutsch Aussenwirtschaft-stagung des Deutschen Übersee-Institut’, in Schriften des Deutschen-Übersee-Instituts, II (Hamburg), 10, 1991, pp. 167–86.Google Scholar

4 It was well known in both East and West Germany that the demand for tropical fruit outstripped supply. In fact, there were endless jokes in the G.D.R. about the shortage of bananas.Google Scholar

5 Indicative of this change in policy was the signing of economic agreements with the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, a matter which was not publicly disclosed. Göschel, loc. cit. p. 176.Google Scholar

6 Following entry into the United Nations in 1973, the G.D.R. came under constant pressure to disclose and present information in terms of the conventional categories. It was only in 1982 that it provided its first set of figures to the U.N.Google Scholar

7 The foreign-exchange component of the G.D.R.'s aid was calculated in ‘Valuta Marks’. One VM corresponded to the amount of G.D.R.Marks (M) that would be needed to obtain one unit of convertible currency through the export of G.D.R. goods.Google Scholar

8 Rothensee, Detlef, ‘Ein Qualitative neuer Typ zwischenstaatlicher Beziehungen–die DDR und die Länder Asiens, Afrikas und Lateinamerikas’, in Rissener Rundbrief (Haus Rissen), 9 09 1989, p. 273.Google Scholar

9 According to the U.N., for example, the G.D.R. contributed 0.80 per cent of its G.N.P. to aid in 1981, 0.85 per cent in 1985, and 0.89 per cent in 1988 and 1989; Schultz, ‘Characteristics of…’, p. 318. By way of contrast, according to the O.E.C.D., which made adjustments for preferential price arrangements, the G.D.R. contributed only 0.17 per cent of G.N.P. to aid in 1981 and 0.12 per cent in 1983. The difficulties in calculating the contribution of C.M.E.A. countries led the O.E.C.D. in 1988 to finally abandon publication of these figures.Google Scholar

10 Schultz, ‘Characteristics of…’, p. 324.

11 Ibid. p. 321.

12 Rothensee, loc. cit. p. 279.

13 There were also many students from socialist bloc countries, notably the Soviet Union and Poland, and even a few from the West took short-term courses, including some from Britain.Google Scholar

14 Heilmann, Peter, ‘Aspekte des Ausländerstudiums in der DDR’, in Asien, Afrika, Lateinamerika (Berlin), 18, 1990, p. 798.Google Scholar

15 ‘Die DDR beschäftigt 47,000 Ausländerstudiums in der DDR’, in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Frankfurt), 22 08 1988, p. 4.Google Scholar

16 Last, Brigitte, ‘Zur Expertensendung der DDR in Entwicklungsländer’, Zentralinstitut für Hochschulbildung, Berlin, August 1990, p. 4.Google Scholar

17 Other countries enjoying preferential pricing policies included Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, and Nicaragua.Google Scholar

18 Staatliche Plankommission, March 1990, op. cit. p. 10.

19 Ibid. p. 11.

20 Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 22 August 1988, p. 4.

21 For example, between 1978 and 1984 around 3,200 light lorries were delivered to Mozambique. From then on, deliveries were made through the Ministry for State Security and the People's Army, which did not publish their statistics.

22 See Rothensee, loc. cit. p. 280, and Spanger and Brock, op. cit. pp. 194–9, for a discussion of military aid.

23 September 1991 interview with a senior official in the F.R.G.'s Ministry of Economic Co-operation (B.M.Z.), previously employed in the G.D.R.'s interim Ministry of Economic Co-operation (M.W.Z.) that had been established in March 1990. Hereinafter referred to as September 1991 B.M.Z. interview.Google Scholar

24 There were three main centres of area studies in the G.D.R.: namely, Humboldt University in Berlin for Asian Studies, Leipzig University for Africa—Near East Studies, and the Latin American Institute in Rostock — the latter being closed in 1990. See Steffen Flechsig and Detlev Wahl, ‘Abwicklung, gegenwärtige Situation und Zukunft der Lateinamerikawissenschaften an der Universität Rostock’, September 1993.Google Scholar

25 Staatliche Plankommission, March 1990, op. cit. p. 8.

26 The Solidarity Committee also supported, inter alia, the Stassfurt Friendship School for Mozambicans in Magdeburg, the Ethiopian Children's Village in Amba, the Friendship Hospital in Hanoi, the 17th April Hospital in Phnom Penh, and a home for Namibian children in Berlin (G.D.R.), as well as social facilities for coffee, pepper, and rubber plantations in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos.Google Scholar

27 Hanlon, Joseph, Mozambique: who calls the shots? (London and Bloomington, 1991), p. 270.Google Scholar

28 Ordnung, Carl, ‘DDR und Entwicklungsländer’, in Entwicklungspolitik (Bonn), 2 02 1988, p.b.Google Scholar

29 September 1991 B.M.Z. interview.

30 Claus, Burghard, ‘Die Entwicklungspolitik der DDR im Umbruch’, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin, February 1990, appendix 1.Google Scholar

31 The largest recipient of Solidarity Committee aid was Vietnam, accounting for M41 million (19·3 per cent) in 1988. Second was Nicaragua with M30·5 million (14·3 per cent), followed by Mozambique with M23·4 million (11 per cent). See Evangelische Akademie, op.cit. p. 21.

32 See Mulder, Anneke, ‘Report on the Reintegration of Mozambican Workers from the Ex-GDR’, Weltfriedensdienst, Berlin, August 1991, p. 5,Google Scholar and Schönmeier, H. W., ‘Prüfung der Möglichkeiten eines Fachkräfteprogramms Mosambik’, in Studie im Auftrag der 10M (Saarbrücken), 03 1991, p. 11.Google Scholar

33 Mulder, op. cit.

34 Schönmeier, loc. cit. p. 101.

35 Heilmann, loc. cit. p. 799.

36 Article 6 of ‘Vereinbarung zwischen der Regierung der DDR und der Regierung der Volksrepublik Mocambique über eine Ausnahmeregelung für den Einsatz von Spezialisten der DDR auf kommerzieller Basis in der VR Mocambique’, 16 April 1985.Google Scholar

37 ‘Protokoll zwischen der Regierung der DDR und der Volksrepublik Mocambique über die wissenschaftlich-technische Zusammenarbeit für den 2-Jahres Zeitraum 1988 und 1989’, 1987.Google Scholar

38 The priority countries were Afghanistan, Angola, Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Yemen, according to Last, op. cit. p. 5.

39 Article 1, ‘Protokoll…1988 und 1989’.

40 Rippegather, J., ‘Im Blickpunkt: Entwicklungshilfe in der DDR Solidarität als Grundidee’, in Frankfurter Rundschau (Frankfurt), 2 01 1990.Google Scholar

41 ‘Fortführung der Entwicklungshilfe der DDR’, in Das Ausländer- und Auslands Magazin im Deutschsprachigen Raum, Pressedienst (Berlin), 3, 09 1991, p. 10.Google Scholar

42 Of these foreign workers, 55,000 were Vietnamese, 12,000 Mozambicans, 4,000 Cubans, and 1,000 Angolans. ‘Rechenschaftsbericht der Länderabteilung’, M.W.Z., Berlin, 2 October 1990, p. 37.Google Scholar

43 Vornbauemen, Axel, ‘Viele Projekte der DDR-Entwicklungshife werden fortgeführt’, in Frankfurter Rundschau, 17 11 1990, p. 5.Google Scholar

44 September 1991 B.M.Z. interview.

45 See ‘Reahenschaftsbericht der Länderabteilung’, p. 35.

46 Mozambiquefile (Maputo), 01 1991, p. 10.Google Scholar

47 Thus, instead of a monthly M300, residents now had to pay DM250. Rücker, Birgit and Tump, Rainer, ‘Ghetto oder Lager’, in Informationsdienst südliches Afrika (Bonn), 1, 01–02 1991, pp. 32–3.Google Scholar

48 According to Mozambiquefile, November 1990, p. 12, some workers found themselves flown to Johannesburg after their plane was unable to land in Mozambique. However, without visas they were forced to fly back to Europe and only then could they proceed to Maputo.Google Scholar

49 As a result, whilst those who had worked in the G.D.R. for five years should have received DM24,000, in practice they received the mere sum of DM2,000. Rücker and Tump, loc. cit. p. 33.Google Scholar

50 Mozambiquefile, January 1991, p. 12.

51 As an adaptation of the term ‘ma-Joni’, used to describe Mozambicans who worked in the South African mines, ‘ma-German’ has negative overtones. Other terms used to describe the returnees were ‘os molwenes da zona’ (the marginals of the neighbourhood) and ‘ninjas’. Mulder, op. cit. p. 18.

52 Claus, Burghard and Taake, H.H., ‘Die Entwicklungspolitik der DDR–ein Rückblick’, in Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, 1991, p. 5.Google Scholar

53 From available statistics on 176 of these former students, 48 went to Magdeburg to work in machinery and metallurgy, 42 to Chemnitz in machinery and construction industries, 31 to East Berlin in electronics, 27 to Cottbus in coal and energy, and the remainder to Dresden, Leipzig, and Neubrandenburg, See Schönmeier, loc. cit. p. 263.Google Scholar

54 See Rechenschaftsbericht der Länderabteilung, p. 11.

55 Ibid. p. 107.

56 September 1991 B.M.Z. interview.

57 ‘Die Altprojekte der DDR sollen keine Ruinen werden’, in Handelsblatt (Düsseldorf), 25 10 1990, p. 13.Google Scholar

58 September 1991 B.M.Z. interview.

59 Interview in Berlin, September 1991.

60 Another example of ‘bad aid’ concerned a proposed phosphate and bauxite site in Guinea-Bissau, where the G.D.R. sent experts despite the fact that this project had already been rejected by other international agencies. September 1991 B.M.Z. interview.

61 Interview, Humboldt University, September 1991.

62 September 1991 B.M.Z. interview.

63 Claus and Taake, op. cit. p. 12.

64 So, for example, all the equipment and furnishings in the hospital in Managua, even the electricity system, had been imported from the G.D.R.

65 For a critical discussion of the rôle of international agencies in Mozambique and the latter's dependence on aid, see Hanlon, op. cit.; Bowen, Merle L., ‘Beyond Reform: adjustment and political power in contemporary Mozambique’, in The Journal of Modern African Studies, 30, 2, 06 1992, pp. 255–79;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and David N. Plank, ‘Aid, Debt, and the End of Sovereignty: Mozambique and its donors’, in ibid. 31, 3, September 1993, pp. 407–30.