Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-cgcw8 Total loading time: 0.428 Render date: 2021-09-17T07:59:06.474Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

‘The people's choice’: popular (il)legitimacy in autocratic Cameroon*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

Natalie Wenzell Letsa*
Affiliation:
Department of International and Area Studies, University of Oklahoma, 729 Elm Ave., Farzaneh Hall, Norman, OK 73019, USA
*Corresponding

Abstract

While many analysts assume that the autocratic regime of Paul Biya is deeply unpopular amongst ordinary Cameroonians, there is almost no existing analysis of public opinion in Cameroon. In fact, Cameroonians are deeply divided in their beliefs about politics; while many view the government as democratic and legitimate, others see the regime as entirely autocratic. What explains these fundamental divides in beliefs? While existing theories point to demographic factors as the most important predictors of political opinions, this article argues that in autocratic regimes, political geography is even more important to understanding these divides. Political parties in autocratic regimes develop opposite narratives about the legitimacy of the state, and regardless of education, partisanship, age, or ethnicity, citizens living in party strongholds are far more likely to adopt these narratives than citizens outside of strongholds. Understanding these divides is critical to explaining regime legitimisation in Cameroon, and African autocracies more broadly.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author would like to thank Brenda Masanga, Miguel Bityeki, Evelyn Ngu, Shella Ayula and Kwame Letsa for their excellent research assistance, as well as Michael Allen, Chris Fomunyoh, Lauren Honig, Carl LeVan, Nicolas van de Walle and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

References

Afrobarometer. 2015. Afrobarometer Data, Cameroon, Round 6. http://www.afrobarometer.org.Google Scholar
Albaugh, E.A. 2011. ‘An autocrat’s toolkit: adaptation and manipulation in ‘democratic’ Cameroon’, Democratization 18, 2: 388414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, B. & Samuels, D.. 2014. Inequality and Democratization: an elite-competition approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardener, E. 1962. ‘The political history of Cameroon’, The World Today 18, 8: 341–50.Google Scholar
Banful, A.B. 2011. ‘Old problems in the new solutions? Politically motivated allocation of program benefits and the ‘new’ fertilizer subsidies’, World Development 39, 7: 1166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basedau, M. & Stroh, A.. 2009. Ethnicity and Party Systems in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN Scholarly Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1398693 (5 June 2017).Google Scholar
Basedau, M. & Stroh, A.. 2012. ‘How ethnic are African parties really? Evidence from four Francophone countries’, International Political Science Review 33, 1: 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. 1979. L’État au Cameroun. Paris: Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.Google Scholar
Blaydes, L. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bleck, J. & van de Walle, N.. 2013. ‘Valence issues in African elections navigating uncertainty and the weight of the past’, Comparative Political Studies 46, 11: 1394–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M., Mattes, R. & Gyimah-Boadi, E.. 2005. Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croke, K., Grossman, G., Larreguy, H. & Marshall, J.. 2016. ‘Deliberate disengagement: how education can decrease political participation in electoral authoritarian regimes’, American Political Science Review 110, 3: 579600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eifert, B., Miguel, E. & Posner, D.N.. 2010. ‘Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa’, American Journal of Political Science 54, 2: 494510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonchingong, C.C. 2005. ‘Exploring the politics of identity and ethnicity in state reconstruction in Cameroon’, Social Identities 11, 4: 363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2010. Cameroon: the dangers of a fracturing regime. Dakar/Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
Kasara, K. 2007. ‘Tax me if you can: ethnic geography, democracy, and the taxation of agriculture in Africa’, American Political Science Review 101, 1: 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koter, D. 2013. ‘Urban and rural voting patterns in Senegal: the spatial aspects of incumbency, 1978–2012’, Journal of Modern African Studies 51, 4: 653–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramon, E. & Posner, D.N.. 2013. ‘Who benefits from distributive politics? How the outcome one studies affects the answer one gets’, Perspectives on Politics 11, 2: 461–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, M. 1994. ‘Cameroon's democratic crossroads, 1990–4’, Journal of Modern African Studies 32, 4: 605–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVine, V.T. 1964. The Cameroons: From Mandate to Independence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S.I. & Morrison, M.K.C.. 2005. ‘Exploring voter alignments in Africa: core and swing voters in Ghana’, Journal of Modern African Studies 43, 4: 565–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, B. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. 1993. An Assessment of the October 11, 1992 Election in Cameroon. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Norris, P. & Mattes, R.. 2003. ‘Does Ethnicity Determine Support for the Governing Party?’ Afrobarometer Working Paper No. 26.Google Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F.B. 1999. ‘Commentary: Cameroon: a country united by ethnic ambition and difference’, African Affairs 98, 390: 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F. & Rowlands, M.. 1998. ‘Elite associations and the politics of belonging in Cameroon’, Africa 68, 3: 320–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigeaud, F. 2011. Au Cameroun de Paul Biya. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Posner, D.N. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, R.B. 2014. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, A. 2002. ‘The nested game of democratization by elections’, International Political Science Review 23, 1: 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroh, A. 2010. ‘The power of proximity: a concept of political party strategies applied to Burkina Faso’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 28, 1: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takougang, J. 2003. ‘The 2002 legislative election in Cameroon: a retrospective on Cameroon's stalled democracy movement’, Journal of Modern African Studies 41, 3: 421–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takougang, J. & Krieger, M.. 1998. African State and Society in the 1990s: Cameroon's political crossroads. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wahman, M. 2015. ‘Nationalized incumbents and regional challengers: opposition- and incumbent-party nationalization in Africa’, Party Politics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596515.Google Scholar
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

‘The people's choice’: popular (il)legitimacy in autocratic Cameroon*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

‘The people's choice’: popular (il)legitimacy in autocratic Cameroon*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

‘The people's choice’: popular (il)legitimacy in autocratic Cameroon*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *