AjzenI., BrownT.C., & CarvajalF. (2004). Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 30, 1108–1121.
BainP.G., HornseyM, BongiornoR., & JeffriesC. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change.
BainP.G., HornseyM.J., BongiornoR., KashimaY., & CrimstonD. (2013). Collective futures: How projections about the future of society are related to actions and attitudes supporting social change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 523–539.
BainP.G., MilfontT.L., KashimaY., BilewiczM., DoronG., GarðarsdóttirR.B., . . . SaviolidisN.M. (2015). Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world. Nature Climate Change. Advance online publication. doi:10.1038/nclimate2814
BickerstaffK., LorenzoniI., PidgeonN.F., PoortingaW., & SimmonsP. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 145–169.
ButlerC., ParkhillK., & PidgeonN.F. (2011). Nuclear power after Japan: The social dimensions. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53, 3–14.
ChomskyN. (1999/1970). Language and freedom. Resonance, 4, 86–104.
de GrootJ.I., StegL., & PoortingaW. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 33, 307–317.
Drottz-SjöbergB.-M., & SjobergL. (1990). Risk perception and worries after the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 135–49.
FiskeS.T., CuddyA.J.C., & GlickP. (2006). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
HugheyJ.B., & SundstromE. (1988). Perceptions of Three Mile Island and acceptance of a nuclear power plant in a distant community. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 880–890.
JuddC.M., James-HawkinsL., YzerbytV., & KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.529
KovacsP., EngT., & GordelierS. (2010). Public attitudes to nuclear power. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
LeachC. W., EllemersN., & BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi:10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.206.
McDanielsT.L. (1988). Chernobyl's effects on the perceived risks of nuclear power: A small sample test. Risk Analysis, 8, 457–461.
ManiatesM., & MeyerJ. (2010). Sacrifice and a new environmental politics. In Maniates M. & Meyer J. (Eds.), The environmental politics of sacrifice (pp. 313–320). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MilfontT.L., BainP.G., SouzaR.L.V., GouveiaV.V., & KashimaY. (2014). Examining how projections about the future of society are related to present-day climate change action. Psico, 45, 359–368.
ParkJ., & BainP. (2013, August). Perceptions about future Korea upon possible unification. Paper presented at Asian Association of Social Psychology, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
PidgeonN.F., LorenzoniI., & PoortingaW. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power — No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18, 69–85.
PoortingaW., & PidgeonN.F. (2003). Public perceptions of risk, science and governance: Main findings of a British survey on five risk cases (Technical Report). Norwich, UK: Centre for Environmental Risk.
PratiG., & ZaniB. (2012). The effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on risk perception, antinuclear behavioral intention, attitude, trust, environmental beliefs, and values. Environment and Bahavior, 45, 782–798.
SiegristM., & VisschersV.H.M. (2013). Acceptance of nuclear power: The Fukushima effect. Energy Policy, 59, 112–119.
van der PligtJ., EiserR., & SpearsR. (1984). Public attitudes to nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 12, 302–305.
VisschersV.H.M., & SiegristM. (2013). How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: Results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Analysis, 33, 333–347.
WhitfieldS.C., RosaE.A., DanA., & DietzT. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 29, 425–437.