Skip to main content
×
Home

What Confucian Philosophy Means for Chinese and Asian Psychology Today: Indigenous Roots for a Psychology of Social Change

  • James H. Liu (a1)
Abstract

It is claimed via analysis of Shu-Hsien Liu's seminal book Understanding Confucian Philosophy that contemporary Confucianism offers: (1) a set of ultimate concerns that can be used to guide life and scholarly endeavour; (2) an axiomatic world view, and a generative model of human nature that not only accords with empirical evidence, but is highly adaptive in organising society; (3) an epistemology that is appropriate for social science research on social change. These qualities suggest that contemporary Confucianism can inform psychological research in a manner that goes far deeper than merely describing popular tendencies among culturally Chinese people. It may be used in constructing a form of social science with depth and utility in addressing both practical and existential concerns of scholars and ordinary people in society that is not restricted to Chinese societies alone, but any society in need of inspiration in seeking to construct humanist ethics for research and governance.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      What Confucian Philosophy Means for Chinese and Asian Psychology Today: Indigenous Roots for a Psychology of Social Change
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      What Confucian Philosophy Means for Chinese and Asian Psychology Today: Indigenous Roots for a Psychology of Social Change
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      What Confucian Philosophy Means for Chinese and Asian Psychology Today: Indigenous Roots for a Psychology of Social Change
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Professor James H. Liu, Co-Director, Centre for Applied Cross Cultural Research, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Email: james.liu@vuw.ac.nz
References
Hide All
Bond M.H. (Ed). (2010). Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chang C. (1957–1962). The development of Neo-Confucian thought. New York: Bookman Associates.
Cheung T.S., Chan H.M., Chan K.M., King A.Y.C, Chiu C.Y., & Yang C.F. (2003). On Zhongyong rationality: The Confucian doctrine of the mean as a missing link between instrumental rationality and communicative rationality. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (1), 107127.
Hau K.T., & Ho I.T. (2010). Chinese students’ motivation and achievement. In Bond M.H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 187204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ho D.Y.F., & Chau A.W.L. (2009). Interpersonal perceptions and metaperceptions of relationship closeness, satisfaction and popularity: A relational and directional analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 173184.
Ho D.Y.F., Peng S.Q., Lai A.C., & Chan S.F.F. (2001). Indigenization and beyond: Methodological relationalism in the study of personality across cultural traditions. Journal of Personality, 69 (6), 925953.
Hwang K.K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. New York: Springer.
Hwang K.K., & Han K.H. (2010). Face and morality in Confucian society. In Bond M.H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 479498). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ji L.J., Lee A., & Guo T. (2010). The thinking styles of Chinese people. In Bond M.H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 155167). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kashima Y. (2005). Is culture a problem for social psychology? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 1938.
Kember D., & Watkins D. (2010). Approaches to teaching and learning by the Chinese. In Bond M.H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 169186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu J.H. (2011). Asian epistemologies and contemporary social psychological research. In Denzin N. & Lincoln Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 213226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Liu J.H. (2014). Globalizing indigenous psychology: An East Asian form of hierarchical relationalism with worldwide implications. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. Published online 6 March 2014, doi:10.1111/jtsb.12058.
Liu J.H., & Atsumi T. (2008). Historical conflict and resolution between Japan and China: Developing and applying a narrative theory of history and identity. In Sugiman T., Gergen K.J., Wagner W., & Yamada Y. (Eds.), Meaning in action: Constructions, narratives, and representations (pp. 327344). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
Liu J.H., Li M.C., & Yue X.D. (2010). Chinese social identity and intergroup relations: The influence of benevolent authority. In Bond M.H. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 579597). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu J.H., & Liu S.H. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and Neo-Confucian thinking: A critical history of paradigm shifts and values in academic psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 15 (2), 159177.
Liu S.H., & Liu J.H. (1998). Confucian philosophy and psychology: A summary of interrelations. In Yang K.S. (Ed.), Indigenous psychological research in Chinese societies (本土心理學研究), [in Chinese] (pp. 343364). Taipei: Gui Kuan Books, National Taiwan University.
Liu J.H., & Liu S.H. (1999). Interconnectedness and Asian social psychology. In Sugiman T., Karasawa M., Liu J.H., & Ward C. (Eds.), Progress in Asian Social Psychology (vol. 2, pp. 931). Seoul: Kyoyook Kwahaksa.
Liu J.H., & Liu S.H. (2003). The role of the social psychologist in the ‘Benevolent Authority’ and ‘Plurality of Powers’ systems of historical affordance for authority. In Yang K.S., Hwang K.K., Pedersen P.B., & Daibo I. (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology: Conceptual and empirical contributions (vol. 3, pp. 4366). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Liu J.H., & Ng S.H. (2007). Connecting Asians in global perspective: Special issue on past contributions, current status, and future prospects of Asian social psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10 (1), 17.
Liu J.H., Ng S.H., Gastardo-Conaco C., & Wong D.S.W.(2008). Action research: A missing component in the emergence of social and cross-cultural psychology as a fully inter-connected global enterprise. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2 (3), 11621181
Liu S.H. (1989). Toward a new relation between humanity and nature: Reconstructing t’ien-jen-ho-i. Zygon, 24, 457468.
Liu S.H. (1993). The psychotherapeutic function of the Confucian discipline of Hsin (mind-heart). In Cheng L.Y., Cheung F., & Chen C.N. (Eds.) Psychotherapy for the Chinese (pp. 117). Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Liu S.H. (1998). Understanding Confucian Philosophy: Classical and Sung-Ming. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Liu S.H. (2000). The openness of Confucianism. Global Dialogues, 2 (1). Retrieved from http://www.worlddialogue.org/content.php?id=62
Mou Z.S. (1979). Unique features of Chinese philosophy. Taipei, Taiwan: Xuesheng Shuju.
Ng I. (2010). Chinese political psychology: Political participation in Chinese societies. In Bond M.H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 563578). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nisbett R.E., Peng K., Choi I., & Norenzayan A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291310.
Onar N.F., Liu J.H., & Woodward M. (2014). Symbologies, technologies, and identities: Critical Junctures Theory and the multi-layered nation-state. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Published online 6 November 2014, doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.08.009
Quah J.S.T. (2001). Combatting corruption in Singapore: What can be learned? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 9 (1), 2935.
Shi X., & Feng B. (2010). Chinese cultural psychology and contemporary communication. In Bond M.H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 555562). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stevenson H.W., & Stigler J.W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Stevenson H.W., Lee S.Y., & Stigler J.W. (1986). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children, Science, 231, 693699.
Tillich P. (1951). Systematic theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Yang K.S. (1998). Chinese responses to modernization: A psychological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 7597.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1834-4909
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pacific-rim-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 32
Total number of PDF views: 203 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 198 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.