Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-20T09:23:57.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First occurrence of Xenopus (Anura: Pipidae) on the Arabian Peninsula: A new species from the Upper Oligocene of Yemen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Amy C. Henrici  and
Ana Maria Báez
Amy C. Henrici
Affiliation:
Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,
Ana Maria Báez
Affiliation:
Departmento de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, (1428) Buenos Aires, Argentina,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A freshwater interbed of the Yemen Volcanic Group in central western Yemen yielded impressions of numerous, articulated, mostly complete frog skeletons. Recent dating of the volcanics and the stratigraphic position of the fossil bearing bed in the sequence support a Late Oligocene age for the frogs. These frogs are described as a new species of Xenopus, a genus that is today mostly confined to subsaharan Africa, and they provide evidence of the former, wider distribution of this genus on the Afro-Arabian Plate. The new species, X. arabiensis, differs from other Xenopus in its long maxilla and maxillary tooth row. It resembles X. muelleri in its dentate, azygous vomer and prominent, cone-shaped, distally-pointed prehallux, but differs from X. muelleri in having an atlantal intercotylar notch and longer distal prehallux bone. Climatic changes during the Neogene probably led to the extinction of Xenopus on the Arabian Peninsula; however, the timing of this event is not certain.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , July 2001 , pp. 870 - 882
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahl, E. 1926. Xenopus stromeri Ahl, n. sp., p. 141–142. In Kaiser, E. (ed.), Die Diamantenwüste Südwest-Afrikas, volume 2. Verlag von Dietrich Reimer (Ernst Vohsen), Berlin.Google Scholar
As-Saruri, M. L., Whybrow, P. J., and Collinson, M. E. 1999. Geology, fruits, seeds, and vertebrates (?Sirenia) from the Kaninah Formation (Middle Eocene), Republic of Yemen, p. 443–453. In Hill, P. J. Whybrow and A. (eds.), Fossil Vertebrates of Arabia: With emphasis on the Late Miocene faunas, geology, and palaeoenvironments of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Báez, A. M. 1981. Redescription and relationships of Saltenia ibanezi, a late Cretaceous pipid from northwestern Argentina. Ameghiniana, 3–4:127–154Google Scholar
Báez, A. M. 1987. Part III. Anurans, p. 121–130. In The Late Cretaceous Fauna of Los Alamitos, Patagonia, Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Paleontología 3.Google Scholar
Báez, A. M. 1996. The fossil record of the Pipidae, p. 339–347. In Kobel, R. C. Tinsley and H. R. (eds.), The Biology of Xenopus . The Zoological Society of London, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Báez, A. M., and Púgener, L. A. 1998. A new Paleogene pipid frog from northwestern Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18:511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Báez, A. M., and Trueb, L. 1997. Redescription of the Paleogene Shelania pascuali from Patagonia and its bearing on the relationships of fossil and Recent pipoid frogs. Scientific Papers, Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas, 4:1–41.Google Scholar
Baker, J. A., Snee, L. W., and Menzies, M. A. 1996. A brief Oligocene period of flood volcanism in Yemen; implications for the duration and rate of continental flood volcanism at the Afro-Arabian triple junction. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 138:39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Swisher, C. C., and Aubry, M. A. 1995. A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy, p. 129–212. In Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Aubry, M. A., and Hardenbol, J. (eds.), Geochronology Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation. SEPM Special Publication No. 54.Google Scholar
Bisbee, C. A., Baker, M. A., Wilson, A. C., Hadji-Azimi, I., and Fischberg, M. 1977. Albumin phylogeny for clawed frogs (Xenopus). Science, 195:785–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkin, L. J. 1999. Distribution of amphibians in north Africa, Europe, western Asia, and the former Soviet Union, p. 329–420. In Duellman, W. E. (ed.), Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: a Global Perspective. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Buffetaut, E., and Rage, J.-C. 1993. Fossil amphibians and reptiles and the Africa-South America connection, p. 87–99. In Lavocat, W. George and R. (eds.), The Africa-South American Connection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cannatella, D. C., and Trueb, L. 1988. Evolution of pipoid frogs: Intergeneric relationships of the aquatic frog family Pipidae (Anura). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 94:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannatella, D. C., and de Sá, R. O. 1993. Xenopus laevis as a model organism. Systematic Biology, 42:476–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, I., Al-Kadasi, M., Al-Kirbash, S., Al-Subbary, A., Baker, J., Blakey, S., Bosens, D., Dart, C., Heaton, R., MacKlay, K., Menzies, M., Nichols, G., Owen, L., and Yellan, A. 1994. Geological evolution of the southeastern Red Sea margin, Republic of Yemen. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 106:1474–1493.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, R. 1975a. Xenopus from the Paleocene of Brazil and its zoogeographic importance. Nature, 254:48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, R. 1975b. Fossil Xenopus from the Paleocene of South America and the zoogeography of pipid frogs. Herpetologica, 31:263–278.Google Scholar
Estes, R. 1977. Relationships of the South African fossil frog Eoxenopoides reuningi (Anura, Pipidae). Annals of the South African Museum, 73:49–80.Google Scholar
Fabrezi, M. 1992. El carpo de los anuros. Alytes, 10:1–29.Google Scholar
Fabrezi, M. 1993. The anuran tarsus. Alytes, 11:47–63.Google Scholar
Fabrezi, M., and Alberch, P. 1996. The carpal elements of anurans. Herpetologica, 52:188–204.Google Scholar
Forey, P. L., and Young, S. V. T. 1999. Late Miocene fishes of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, p. 120–135. In Hill, P. J. Whybrow and A. (eds.), Fossil Vertebrates of Arabia: with emphasis on the Late Miocene faunas, geology, and palaeoenvironments of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Geukens, F. 1966. Geology of the Arabian Peninsula, Yemen. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 560-B:1–23Google Scholar
Hendy, Q. B. 1970. A review of the geology and paleontology of the Pio/Pleistocene deposits at Langebaanweg, Cape Province. Annals of the South African Museum 56:75–113.Google Scholar
Hofmann, C., Courtillot, V., Féraud, G., Rochette, P., Yirgu, G., Ketefo, E., and Pik, R. 1997. Timing of the Ethiopian flood basalt event and implications for plume birth and global change. Nature, 389:838–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, J. D., and Hill, H. 1999. Late Miocene palaeoenvironments in Arabia: a synthesis, p. 389–407. In Hill, P. J. Whybrow and A. (eds.), Fossil Vertebrates of Arabia: with emphasis on the Late Miocene faunas, geology, and palaeoenvironments of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Kobel, H. R., Barandun, B., and Thiebaud, C. H. 1998. Mitochondrial rDNA phytogeny in Xenopus . Herpetological Journal, 8:13–17.Google Scholar
Kobel, H. R., Loumont, C., and Tinsley, R. C. 1996. The extant species, p. 9–33. In Kobel, R. C. Tinsley and H. R. (eds.), The Biology of Xenopus . The Zoological Society of London, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Loumont, C., and Kobel, H. R. 1991. Xenopus longipes sp. nov., a new polyploid pipid from western Cameroon. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 98:731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, M. A., Baker, J., Bosence, D., Dart, C., Davison, I., Hurford, A., Al'Kadasi, M., McKlay, K., Nichols, G., Al'Subbary, A., and Yelland, A. 1992. The timing of magmatism, uplift and crustal extension: preliminary observations from Yemen, p. 293–304. In Storey, B. C., Alabaster, T., and Pankhurst (eds), R. J., Magmatism and the Causes of Continental Break-up. Geological Society Special Publication 68, London.Google Scholar
Nieuwkoop, P. D., and Faber, J. 1956. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). A systematical and chronological survey of the development from the fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis. North Holland Publication Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pachur, H. J., and Altmann, N. 1997. The Quaternary (Holocene, ca 8000a BP), p. 111–125. In Reynolds, H., and Schandelmeier, P. O. (eds.), Palaeogeographic-Palaeotectonic Atlas of North-Eastern Africa, Arabia, and Adjacent Areas. A. A. Balkeema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Reumer, J. W. F. 1985. Some aspects of the cranial osteology and phytogeny of Xenopus (Anura, Pipidae). Revue Suisse de Zoology, 92:969–980.Google Scholar
Rögl, F. 1999. Circum-Mediterranean Miocene paleogeography, p. 39–48. In Rössner, G. E. and Heissig, K. (eds.), Land Mammals of Europe. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Schandelmeier, H., and Reynolds, P. O. 1997. Palaeogeographic-Palaeotectonic Atlas of North-Eastern Africa, Arabia, and Adjacent Areas. A. A. Balkeema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R., and Golonka, J. 1992. PALEOMAP Progress Report #20. Department of Geology, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Shubin, N., and Alberch, P. 1986. A morphogenetic approach on the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb, p. 319–387. In Hecht, M., Wallace, B., and Prance, G. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Špinar, Z. V. 1980. The discovery of a new species of pipid frog (Anura, Pipidae) in the Oligocene of central Libya, p. 327–348. In Salem, M. J. and Busrewill, M. J. (eds.), The Geology of Libya. Volume 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Stromer, E. 1931. Reste Süsswasser und Land bewohnender Wirbeltiere aus den Diamanfeldern Klein-Namaqualandes (Südwestafrika)-Sitzungsberichte Bayerischen Akademie Wissenschaften, Mathematische-Naturwissenschaaftliche Abteilung, 1931:17–47.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I., Clark, J. M., and Whybrow, P. 1995. Paleontological reconnaissance in Yemen. Bulletin of the American Institute for Yemeni Studies, 37:21–24.Google Scholar
Thomas, H., Roger, J., Sen, S., Gheerbrant, M. P. E., and Al-Busaidi, . 1999. Oligocene and Miocene terrestrial vertebrates in the southern Arabian Peninsula (Sultanate of Oman) and their geodynamic and palaeogeographic settings, p. 430–442. In Whybrow, P. J. and Hill, A. (eds.), Fossil Vertebrates of Arabia: With emphasis on the Late Miocene faunas, geology, and palaeoenvironments of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. 1973. Studies on the ecology and systematics of a new species of clawed toad, the genus Xenopus, from western Uganda. Journal of Zoology, London, 169:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, R. C. 1975. The morphology and distribution of Xenopus vestitus (Anura: Pipidae) in central Africa. Journal of Zoology, London, 175:473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, R. C., Loumont, C., and Kobel, H. R. 1996. Geographical distribution and ecology, p. 35–59. In Tinsley, R. C. and Kobel, H. R. (eds.), The Biology of Xenopus . The Zoological Society of London, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Trueb, L., and Hanken, J. 1992. Skeletal development in Xenopus laevis (Anura: Pipidae). Journal of Morphology, 214:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, D. E. 1995. African fossil Lissamphibia. Palaeontographia Africana, 32:39–43.Google Scholar
Weijmars, R. 1989. Global tectonics since the breakup of Pangaea 180 million years ago: evolution maps and lithospheric budget. Earth-Science Reviews, 26:113–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whybrow, P. J., and Clements, D. 1999. Arabian Tertiary fauna, flora, and localities, p. 460–473. In Whybrow, P. J. and Hill, A. (eds.), Fossil Vertebrates of Arabia: With emphasis on the Late Miocene faunas, geology, and palaeoenvironments of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Erratum

Amy C. Henrici