Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:05:37.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three new cribrimorph bryozoans (order Cheilostomatida) from the early Miocene of Argentina, with a discussion on spinocystal shield morphologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Juan López-Gappa Open the ORCID record for Juan López-Gappa [Opens in a new window] ,
Leandro M. Pérez ,
Ana C.S. Almeida Open the ORCID record for Ana C.S. Almeida [Opens in a new window] ,
Débora Iturra ,
Dennis P. Gordon  and
Leandro M. Vieira
Juan López-Gappa
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Leandro M. Pérez
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) División Paleozoología Invertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo – UNLP, Anexo Museo 122 y 60, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Ana C.S. Almeida
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos de Bryozoa (LAEBry), Departamento de Zoologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, UFPE, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Brasil ,
Débora Iturra
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo – UNLP, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Dennis P. Gordon
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, PB 14901 Kilbirnie, Wellington 6120, New Zealand
Leandro M. Vieira
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Estudos de Bryozoa (LAEBry), Departamento de Zoologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, UFPE, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Brasil ,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bryozoans with calcified frontal shields formed by the fusion of costae, collectively constituting a spinocyst, are traditionally assigned to the family Cribrilinidae. Today, this family is regarded as nonmonophyletic. In the Argentine Cenozoic, cribrilinids were until recently represented by only two fossil species from the Paleocene of Patagonia. This study describes the first fossil representatives of Jolietina and Parafigularia: J. victoria n. sp. and P. pigafettai n. sp., respectively. A fossil species of Figularia, F. elcanoi n. sp., is also described. The material comes from the early Miocene of the Monte León and Chenque formations (Patagonia, Argentina). For comparison, we also provide redescriptions of the remaining extant species of Jolietina: J. latimarginata (Busk, 1884) and J. pulchra Canu and Bassler, 1928a. The systematic position of some species previously assigned to Figularia is here discussed. Costafigularia n. gen. is erected, with Figularia pulcherrima Tilbrook, Hayward, and Gordon, 2001 as type species. Two species previously assigned to Figularia are here transferred to Costafigularia, resulting in C. jucunda n. comb. and C. tahitiensis n. comb. One species of Figularia is reassigned to Vitrimurella, resulting in V. ampla n. comb. The family Vitrimurellidae is here reassigned to the superfamily Cribrilinoidea. The subgenus Juxtacribrilina is elevated to genus rank. Inferusia is regarded as a subjective synonym of Parafigularia. Parafigularia darwini Moyano, 2011 is synonymized with I. taylori Kuklinski and Barnes, 2009, resulting in Parafigularia taylori n. comb. Morphological data suggest that these genera comprise different lineages, and a discussion on the disparities among cribrilinid (sensu lato) spinocysts is provided.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/215957d3-064b-47e2-9090-d0309f6c9cd8

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , May 2021 , pp. 568 - 582
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allman, G.J., 1856, A Monograph of the Fresh-Water Polyzoa, Including All the Known Species, both British and Foreign: London, The Ray Society, 176 p.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1936, Geology and paleontology of the Georges Bank Canyons: Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, v. 47, p. 411–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, R.S., 1953, Bryozoa, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part G: Boulder and Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 253 p.Google Scholar
Bellosi, E.S., 1990, Formación Chenque: Registro de la transgresión patagoniana (Terciario medio) de la cuenca de San Jorge, Argentina: XI Congreso Geológico Argentino (San Juan), Actas, v. 2, p. 57–60.Google Scholar
Berning, B., 2006, The cheilostome bryozoan fauna from the late Miocene of Niebla (Guadalquivir Basin, SW Spain): environmental and biogeographic implications: Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, v. 90, p. 7–156.Google Scholar
Beu, A.G., Griffin, M., and Maxwell, P.A., 1997, Opening of the Drake Passage gateway and late Miocene to Pleistocene cooling reflected in Southern Ocean molluscan dispersal: evidence from New Zealand and Argentina: Tectonophysics, v. 281, p. 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, J.D.D., and Househam, B.C., 1987, Puellina (Bryozoa; Cheilostomatida; Cribrilinidae) from British and adjacent waters: Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Zoology, v. 53, p. 1–63.Google Scholar
Bock, P., 2020, Cribrilinidae Hincks, 1879. https://www.bryozoa.net/cheilostomata/cribrilinidae/index.html [May 2020].Google Scholar
Bock, P.E., and Cook, P.L., 2001, Revision of the multiphased genus Corbulipora MacGillivray (Bryozoa: Cribriomorpha): Memoirs of Museum Victoria, v. 58, p. 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D.A., 1952, The Tertiary Cheilostomatous Polyzoa of New Zealand: London, Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 405 p.Google Scholar
Brown, D.A., 1958, Fossil cheilostomatous Polyzoa from south-west Victoria: Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Victoria, v. 20, p. 1–90.Google Scholar
Buge, E., 1956, Les Bryozoaires du Pliocène du Cap Bon: Annales des Mines et de Géologie, Tunis, v. 17, p. 1–97.Google Scholar
Busk, G., 1852, An account of the Polyzoa, and sertularian zoophytes, collected in the Voyage of the Rattlesnake, on the coasts of Australia and the Louisiade Archipelago, in MacGillivray, J., ed., Narrative of the Voyage of the H.M.S. Rattlesnake: London, T. & W. Boone, p. 343–402.Google Scholar
Busk, G., 1884, Report on the Polyzoa Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873–1876. Part 1. The Cheilostomata: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of the H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873–76: Zoology, v. 10, 216 p.Google Scholar
Cáceres, J., and Moyano, H.I., 1994, Ancéstrulas y patrones astogenéticos de especies de briozoos marinos chilenos II: Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción, v. 65, p. 127–142.Google Scholar
Calvet, L., 1904a, Diagnoses de quelques espèces de Bryozoaires nouvelles ou incomplètement décrites de la Région sub-antarctique de l'Océan Atlantique: Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, v. 29, p. 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvet, L., 1904b, Bryozoen: Ergebnisse der Hamburger Magalhaensische Sammelreise 1892–1893, v. 3, p. 1–45.Google Scholar
Canu, F., 1900, Révision des bryozoaires du Crétacé figurés par d'Orbigny. II, Cheilostomata: Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, ser. 3, v. 28, p. 334–463.Google Scholar
Canu, F., 1908, Iconographie des bryozoaires fossiles de l´Argentine. Première partie: Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires, ser. 3, v. 10, p. 245–341.Google Scholar
Canu, F., 1911, Iconographie des Bryozoaires fossiles de l'Argentine. Deuxième partie: Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires, v. 21, p. 215–291.Google Scholar
Canu, F., and Bassler, R.S., 1920, North American Early Tertiary Bryozoa. United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 106: Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, 879 p.Google Scholar
Canu, F., and Bassler, R.S., 1928a, Bryozoaires du Brésil: Bulletin de la Société des Sciences de Seine-et-Oise, v. 9, p. 58–110.Google Scholar
Canu, F., and Bassler, R.S., 1928b, Fossil and Recent Bryozoa of the Gulf of Mexico region: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 72, p. 1–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canu, F., and Bassler, R.S., 1929, Bryozoa of the Philippine region: United States National Museum Bulletin, v. 100, p. 1–685.Google Scholar
Canu, F., and Lecointre, G., 1928, Les Bryozoaires cheilostomes des Faluns de Touraine et d'Anjou: Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, nouvelle série, v. 4, p. 51–82.Google Scholar
Carmona, N.B., Buatois, L.A., Mángano, M.G., and Bromley, R.G., 2008, Ichnology of the lower Miocene Chenque Formation, Patagonia, Argentina: animal–substrate interactions and the modern evolutionary fauna: Ameghiniana, v. 45, p. 93–122.Google Scholar
Cheetham, A.H., 1954, A new Early Cretaceous cheilostome bryozoan from Texas: Journal of Paleontology, v. 28, p. 177–184.Google Scholar
Cook, P.L., Bock, P.E., Gordon, D.P., and Weaver, H.J., 2018, Australian Bryozoa Volume 2. Taxonomy of Australian Families: Melbourne, CSIRO Publishing, 320 p.Google Scholar
Cuitiño, J.I., Scasso, R.A., Ventura Santos, R., and Mancini, L.H., 2015, Sr ages for the Chenque Formation in the Comodoro Rivadavia region (Golfo San Jorge Basin, Argentina): stratigraphic implications: Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis, v. 22, p. 3–12.Google Scholar
David, L., and Pouyet, S., 1974, Révision des Bryozoaires cheilostomes miocènes du Bassin de Vienne (Autriche): Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Lyon, v. 60, p. 83–257.Google Scholar
Dick, M.H., Lidgard, S., Gordon, D.P., and Mawatari, S.F., 2009, The origin of ascophoran bryozoans was historically contingent but likely: Proceedings of the Royal Society B, v. 276, p. 3141–3148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Martino, E., and Taylor, P.D., 2018, Early Pleistocene and Holocene bryozoans from Indonesia: Zootaxa, v. 4419, 70 p., doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4419.1.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Martino, E., Taylor, P.D., and Portell, R.W., 2017, Bryozoans from the lower Miocene Chipola Formation, Calhoun County, Florida, USA: Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, v. 53, p. 97–200.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A., 1841–1847, Zoophytes. Voyage dans l'Amérique méridionale: (le Brésil, la république orientale de l'Uruguay, la République argentine, la Patagonie, la république du Chili, la république de Bolivia, la république du Pérou), exécuté pendant les années 1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832, et 1833, v. 5, p. 7–28.Google Scholar
Duvergier, J., 1921, Note sur les Bryozoaires du Néogène de l'Aquitaine: Actes de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux, v. 72, p. 145–182.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C.G., 1831, Animalia invertebrata exclusis insects. Symbolae Physicae, seu Icones et descriptiones Corporum Naturalium novorum aut minus cognitorum: Pars Zoologica, v. 4, p. 1–831.Google Scholar
Figuerola, B., Gordon, D.P., and Cristobo, J., 2018, New deep Cheilostomata (Bryozoa) species from the Southwestern Atlantic: shedding light in the dark: Zootaxa, v. 4375, p. 211–249.Google ScholarPubMed
Fuchs, J., Obst, M., and Sundberg, P., 2009, The first comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Bryozoa (Ectoprocta) based on combined analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial genes: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 52, p. 225–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, D.P., 1984, The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata from the Kermadec Ridge: New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, v. 91, 198 p.Google Scholar
Gordon, D.P., 1986, The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata (Ctenostomata and Cheilostomata Anasca) from the Western South Island Continental Shelf and Slope: New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, v. 95, 121 p.Google Scholar
Gordon, D.P., 1989, The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata (Cheilostomida Ascophorina) from the Western South Island Continental Shelf and Slope: New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, v. 97, 158 p.Google Scholar
Gordon, D.P., 2000, Towards a phylogeny of cheilostomes—morphological models of frontal wall/shield evolution, in Herrera-Cubilla, A., and Jackson, J.B.C., eds, Proceedings of the 11th International Bryozoology Association Conference: Balboa, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, p. 17–37.Google Scholar
Gordon, D.P., and Voigt, E., 1996, The kenozooidal origin of the ascophorine hypostegal coelom and associated frontal shield, in Gordon, D.P., Smith, A.M., and Grant-Mackie, J.A., eds, Bryozoans in Space and Time: Wellington, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Reseach, p. 89–107.Google Scholar
Gordon, D.P., Mawatari, S.F., and Kajihara, H., 2002, New taxa of Japanese and New Zealand Eurystomellidae (Phylum Bryozoa) and their phylogenetic relationships: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 136, p. 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grischenko, A.V., Gordon, D.P., Nojo, A., Kawamura, M., Kaneko, N., and Mawatari, S.F., 2004, New Cheilostome bryozoans from the middle Miocene of Hokkaido, Japan, and the first fossil occurrences of Kubaninella and Hayamiellina gen. nov.: Paleontological Research, v. 8, p. 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmelin, J.-G., 2001, Puellina saldanhai, n. sp., a new cribimorph cheilostome (Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata) from dark cave environment of southern Portugal: Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal (Historia Natural), supp., v. 6, p. 39–52.Google Scholar
Harmelin, J.-G., 2006, The Puellina flabellifera species complex: a remarkable example of worldwide species radiation in cribrimorph bryozoans: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 257, p. 73–91.Google Scholar
Harmer, S.F., 1902, On the morphology of the Cheilostomata: Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, v. 46, p. 263–350.Google Scholar
Harmer, S.F., 1926, The Polyzoa of the Siboga Expedition, 2. Cheilostomata Anasca: Siboga Expedition Reports, v. 28b, p. 183–501.Google Scholar
Hayward, P.J., 1988, Mauritian Cheilostome Bryozoa: Journal of Zoology, London, v. 215, p. 269–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J., and Ryland, J.S., 1998, Cheilostomatous Bryozoa. Part 1. Aeteoidea-Cribrilinoidea: Synopses of the British Fauna (new series), v. 10, 366 p.Google Scholar
Hayward, P.J., and Taylor, P.D., 1984, Fossil and Recent Cheilostomata (Bryozoa) from the Ross Sea, Antarctica: Journal of Natural History, v. 18, p. 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J., and Thorpe, J.P., 1990, Some Antarctic and sub-Antarctic species of Smittinidae (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata): Journal of Zoology, v. 222, p. 137–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hincks, T., 1879, On the classification of the British Polyzoa: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 5, v. 3, p. 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hincks, T., 1880, A history of the British Marine Polyzoa: London, Van Voorst, 601 p.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1881, Contributions towards a general history of the marine Polyzoa. Part VI. Polyzoa from Bass's Straits: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 5, v. 8, p. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, G., 1838, A history of the British Zoophytes: Edinburgh, W.H. Lizars, 341 p.Google Scholar
Johnston, G., 1847, A History of British Zoophytes, Volume 1: London, Van Voorst, 488 p.Google Scholar
Jullien, J., 1886, Les Costulidées, nouvelle famille de Bryozoaires: Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, v. 11, p. 601–620.Google Scholar
Kataoka, J., 1961, Bryozoan fauna from the “Ryukyu Limestone” of Kikai-jima, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan: Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Geology, v. 32, p. 213–272.Google Scholar
Knight, S., Gordon, D.P., and Lavery, S.D., 2011, A multi-locus analysis of phylogenetic relationships within cheilostome bryozoans supports multiple origins of ascophoran frontal shields: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 61, p. 351–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuklinski, P., and Barnes, D.K.A., 2009, A new genus and three new species of Antarctic cheilostome Bryozoa: Polar Biology, v. 32, p. 1251–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagaaij, R., 1963, New additions to the bryozoan fauna of the Gulf of Mexico: Publications of the Institute of Marine Science, v. 9, p. 181–236.Google Scholar
Lang, W.D., 1916, A revision of the “cribrimorph” Cretaceous Polyzoa: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 8, v. 18, p. 81–112, 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, W.D., 1921, Catalogue of the Fossil Bryozoa (Polyzoa) in the Department of Geology, British Museum (Natural History). The Cretaceous Bryozoa (Polyzoa), v. 3, The cribrimorphs. Part I: London, British Museum (Natural History), 269 p.Google Scholar
Lang, W.D., 1922, Catalogue of the fossil Bryozoa (Polyzoa) in the Department of Geology, British Museum (Natural History). The Cretaceous Bryozoa (Polyzoa), v. 4, The cribrimorphs. Part 2: London, British Museum (Natural History), 404 p.Google Scholar
Larwood, G.P., 1962, The morphology and systematic of some Cretaceous cribrimorph Polyzoa (Pelmatoporinae): Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, v. 6, 285 p.Google Scholar
Levinsen, G.M.R., 1902, Studies on Bryozoa: Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den naturhistoriske Forening i København, v. 54, p. 1–31.Google Scholar
Levinsen, G.M.R., 1909, Morphological and Systematic Studies on the Cheilostomatous Bryozoa: Copenhagen, Nationale Forfatterers Forlag, 431 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z.P., 1990, Bryozoaires de Montbrison-Fontbonau (Drôme) et comparison avec les autres faunes Miocènes du Bassin Rhodanien méridional: Nouvelles Archives du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Lyon, v. 27, p. 1–126.Google Scholar
Lidgard, S., Carter, M.C., Dick, M.H., Gordon, D.P., and Ostrovsky, A.N., 2012, Division of labor and recurrent evolution of polymorphisms in a group of colonial animals: Evolutionary Ecology, v. 26, p. 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liuzzi, M.G., López-Gappa, J., and Salgado, L., 2018, Bryozoa from the continental shelf off Tierra del Fuego (Argentina): species richness, colonial growth-forms, and their relationship with water depth: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, v. 214, p. 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Gappa, J., 1977, Briozoos marinos de Tierra del Fuego. II: Neotropica, v. 23, p. 179–187.Google Scholar
López Gappa, J., 2000, Species richness of marine Bryozoa in the continental shelf and slope off Argentina (south-west Atlantic): Diversity and Distributions, v. 6, p. 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Gappa, J., and Lichtschein, V., 1990, Los briozoos coleccionados por el B/I Shinkai Maru en la plataforma continental argentina: Buenos Aires, Servicio de Hidrografía Naval, 32 p.Google Scholar
López-Gappa, J., and Pérez, L.M., 2019, A new genus and species of Chaperiidae (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata) from the early Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina): Ameghiniana, v. 56, p. 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Gappa, J., Pérez, L.M., and Griffin, M., 2017, First record of a fossil selenariid bryozoan in South America: Alcheringa, v. 41, p. 365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Gappa, J., Pérez, L.M., and Griffin, M., 2018, First fossil occurrence of the genus Platychelyna Hayward and Thorpe (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata): Ameghiniana, v. 55, p. 607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGillivray, P.H., 1895, A monograph of the Tertiary Polyzoa of Victoria: Transactions of the Royal Society of Victoria, v. 4, 166 p.Google Scholar
Maplestone, C.M., 1901, Further descriptions of the Tertiary Polyzoa of Victoria. 6: Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria (new series), v. 13, p. 204–213.Google Scholar
Marcus, E., 1955, Notas sôbre briozoos marinhos brasileiros: Arquivos do Museu Nacional, v. 42, p. 273–342.Google Scholar
Martínez, S., and del Río, C.J., 2002, Late Miocene molluscs from the southwestern Atlantic Ocean (Argentina and Uruguay): a palaeobiogeographic analysis: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 188, p. 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyano G., H.I., 1972, Familia Flustridae: ensayo de redistribución de sus especies a nivel genérico: Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción, v. 44, p. 73–101.Google Scholar
Moyano G., H.I., 1984, Chilean Cribrimorpha (Bryozoa Cheilostomata): Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción, v. 55, p. 47–72.Google Scholar
Moyano G., H.I., 1991, Bryozoa Marinos Chilenos VIII. Una síntesis zoogeográfica con consideraciones sistemáticas y la descripción de diez especies y dos géneros nuevos: Gayana Zoología, v. 55, p. 305–389.Google Scholar
Moyano G., H.I., 2011, Cribrimorfos chilenos 2011 con la descripción de una especie nueva (Bryozoa, Cheilostomatida, Cribrilinidae): Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción, v. 79, p. 31–36.Google Scholar
Norman, A., 1903, Notes on the natural history of East Finmark. Polyzoa: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 7, v. 11, p. 567–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, R.J.S., et al. , 2019, Bryozoan genera Fenestrulina and Microporella no longer confamilial; multi-gene phylogeny supports separation: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 186, p. 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osburn, R.C., 1950, Bryozoa of the Pacific Coast of America, Part 1, Cheilostomata-Anasca: Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, v. 14, 269 p.Google Scholar
Ostrovsky, A.N., 2013, From incipient to substantial: evolution of placentotrophy in a phylum of aquatic colonial invertebrates: Evolution, v. 67, p. 1368–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paredes, J., and Colombo, F., 2001, Sedimentología de la Formación Chenque (Oligoceno-Mioceno) en Comodoro Rivadavia. Argentina: Geogaceta, v. 30, p. 103–106.Google Scholar
Parras, A., Dix, G.R., and Griffin, M., 2012, Sr-isotope chronostratigraphy of Paleogene– Neogene marine deposits: Austral Basin, southern Patagonia (Argentina): Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 37, p. 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, L.M., López-Gappa, J., and Griffin, M., 2015, New and little-known bryozoans from Monte León Formation (early Miocene, Argentina) and their paleobiogeographic relationships: Journal of Paleontology, v. 89, p. 956–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, L.M., López-Gappa, J., and Griffin, M., 2018, Taxonomic status of some species of Aspidostomatidae (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata) from the Oligocene and Miocene of Patagonia (Argentina): Journal of Paleontology, v. 92, p. 432–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, N.A., 1967, Polyzoa (Bryozoa)—Ascophora—from north New Zealand: Discovery Reports, v. 34, p. 199–393.Google Scholar
Reuss, A.E., 1848, Die fossilen Polyparien des Wiener Tertiärbeckens: Haidingers Naturwissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen, v. 2, p. 1–109.Google Scholar
Reuss, A.E., 1874, Die fossilen Bryozoen der Österreichisch-ungarischen Miocäns: Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, v. 33, p. 141–190.Google Scholar
Reverter, O., and Fernandez, E., 1996, Cribrilinidae (Bryozoa: Cheilostomatida) from the Ria de Ferrol (NW Spain): Journal of Natural History, v. 30, p. 1247–1260.Google Scholar
Romero, M.V., Brezina, S.S., Bremec, C., and Casadío, S., 2018, Sclerobionts on Patagonian oysters from the Puerto Madryn Formation (early–late Miocene, Argentina): Ameghiniana, v. 55, p. 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosso, A., Beuck, L., Vertino, A., Sanfilippo, R., and Freiwald, A., 2018, Cribrilinids (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) associated with deep-water coral habitats at the Great Bahama Bank slope (NW Atlantic), with description of new taxa: Zootaxa, v. 4524, p. 401–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosso, A., di Martino, E., and Ostrovsky, A.N., 2020, Cribrilinid bryozoans from Pleistocene Mediterranean deep-waters, with the description of new species: Journal of Paleontology. doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2020.93.Google Scholar
Silén, L., 1941, Cheilostomata Anasca (Bryozoa) collected by Prof. Dr. Sixten Bock's expedition to Japan and the Bonin Islands 1914: Arkiv för Zoologi, v. 33A, p. 1–130.Google Scholar
Silén, L., 1942, Origin and development of the Cheilo-ctenostomatous stem of Bryozoa: Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, v. 22, p. 1–59.Google Scholar
Smitt, F.A., 1873, Floridan Bryozoa, collected by Count L.F. de Pourtales, Part II: Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, v. 11, p. 3–83.Google Scholar
Soule, D.F., Soule, J.D., and Chaney, H.W., 1995, Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel. The Bryozoa: Irene McCulloch Foundation Monograph Series, v. 2, 344 p.Google Scholar
Souto, J., Berning, B., and Ostrovsky, A.N., 2016, Systematics and diversity of deep-water Cheilostomata (Bryozoa) from Galicia Bank (NE Atlantic): Zootaxa, v. 4067, p. 401–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P.D., and Waeschenbach, A., 2015, Phylogeny and diversification of bryozoans: Palaeontology, v. 58, p. 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilbrook, K.J., 2006, Cheilostomatous Bryozoa from the Solomon Islands: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Monographs, v. 4 (Studies in Biodiversity 3), 386 p.Google Scholar
Tilbrook, K.J., Hayward, P.J., and Gordon, D.P., 2001, Cheilostomatous Bryozoa from Vanuatu: Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 131, p. 35–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uttley, G.H., and Bullivant, J.S., 1972, Biological results of the Chatham Islands 1954 Expedition. Part 7. Bryozoa Cheilostomata: New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir, v. 57, p. 1–61.Google Scholar
Vieira, L.M., Migotto, A.E., and Winston, J.E., 2008, Synopsis and annotated checklist of Recent marine Bryozoa from Brazil: Zootaxa, v. 1810, p. 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, L.M., Gordon, D.P., Souza, F.B.C., and Haddad, M.A., 2010, New and little-known cheilostomatous Bryozoa from the south and southeastern Brazilian continental shelf and slope: Zootaxa, v. 2722, p. 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, E., and Hillmer, G., 1983, Oberkretazische Hippothoidae (Bryozoa Cheilostomata) aus dem Campanium von Schweden und dem Maastrichtium der Niederlande: Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, v. 54, p. 169–208.Google Scholar
Waeschenbach, A., Taylor, P.D., and Littlewood, D.T., 2012, A molecular phylogeny of bryozoans: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 62, p. 718–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, A.W., 1887, Bryozoa from New South Wales, North Australia, &c. Part III: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 5, v. 20, p. 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, A.W., 1888, Supplementary Report on the Polyzoa collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of the H.M.S. “Challenger”, Zoology, v. 31, 41 p.Google Scholar
Waters, A.W., 1905, Bryozoa from near Cape Horn: Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, v. 29, p. 230–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, A.W., 1923, Mediterranean and other Cribrilinidae, together with their relationships to Cretaceous forms: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 9, v. 12, p. 545–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, J.E., 2005, Re-description and revision of Smitt's “Floridan Bryozoa” in the collection of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University: Virginia Museum of Natural History Memoir, v. 7, 147 p.Google Scholar
Winston, J.E., 2016, Bryozoa of Floridan Oculina reefs: Zootaxa, v. 4071, 81 p. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4071.1.1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, J.E., and Vieira, L.M., 2013, Systematics of interstitial encrusting bryozoans from southeastern Brazil: Zootaxa, v. 3710, p. 101–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, J.E., Vieira, L.M., and Woollacott, R.M., 2014, Scientific results of the Hassler Expedition. Bryozoa. No. 2. Brazil: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, v. 161, p. 139–239.Google Scholar
Yang, H.J., Seo, J.E., Min, B.S., Grischenko, A.V., and Gordon, D.P., 2018, Cribrilinidae (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata) of Korea: Zootaxa, v. 4377, p. 216–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed