Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T16:51:09.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new reconstruction of continental Treptichnus based on exceptionally preserved material from the Jurassic of Massachusetts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2016

Patrick R. Getty ,
Thomas D. McCarthy ,
Shannon Hsieh  and
Andrew M. Bush
Patrick R. Getty
Affiliation:
Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Road, U-1045, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA 〈patrick.getty@uconn.edu〉, 〈Thomas.McCarthy88@gmail.com〉
Thomas D. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Road, U-1045, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA 〈patrick.getty@uconn.edu〉, 〈Thomas.McCarthy88@gmail.com〉
Shannon Hsieh
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, U-3043, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA 〈andrew.bush@uconn.edu〉, 〈shin-nan.hsieh@uconn.edu〉 New address: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street (MC 186), Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA
Andrew M. Bush
Affiliation:
Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Road, U-1045, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA 〈patrick.getty@uconn.edu〉, 〈Thomas.McCarthy88@gmail.com〉 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, U-3043, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA 〈andrew.bush@uconn.edu〉, 〈shin-nan.hsieh@uconn.edu〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Continental deposits of the Early Jurassic East Berlin Formation in Holyoke, Massachusetts, have yielded an exceptional occurrence of the ichnogenus Treptichnus. Here, burrows are preserved in full relief within thin mud laminae between layers of fine-grained, cross-bedded sandstone. We studied these burrows to evaluate whether earlier explanations of burrow morphology are applicable to all Treptichnus. Our research focused on three questions. (1) Do the Holyoke Treptichnus have significant vertical relief? (2) Does the lack of projections in some of the Holyoke Treptichnus result from stratinomic sectioning through the bottom of the burrow? (3) Do expanded, bulbous ends of burrow segments result from sediment compaction? While addressing these questions, the Holyoke fossils were compared to syntype and topotype material of Treptichnus from the Carboniferous of Indiana. The Holyoke Treptichnus did not exhibit significant vertical relief, and the presence and absence of projections is explained by the positioning of new segments at different points along older ones. The bulbous ends of burrow segments resulted from trace-maker behavior, not sediment compaction. Drawing on the analysis of the Holyoke material, a new reconstruction is proposed that presents continental Treptichnus as a shallow mole-tunnel-like burrow produced just below the sediment surface. This reconstruction is consistent with the morphology of Recent Treptichnus-like burrows produced by fly (dipteran) larvae, which are considered the most likely makers of the Holyoke Treptichnus.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 269 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, A.W., and Maples, C.G., 1984, Trace fossil distribution across a marine-to-nonmarine gradient in the Pennsylvanian of southwestern Indiana: Journal of Paleontology, v. 58, p. 448–466.Google Scholar
Archer, A.W., Calder, J.H., Gibling, M.R., Naylor, R.D., Reid, D.R., and Wightman, W.G., 1995, Invertebrate trace fossils and agglutinated foraminifera as indicators of marine influence within the classic Carboniferous section at Joggins, Nova Scotia, Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 32, p. 2027–2039.Google Scholar
Bajard, J., 1966, Figures et structures sédimentaires dans la zone intertidale de la partie orientale de la baie du Mont-Saint-Michel: Revue de Géographie physique et de Géologie dynamique, v. 8, p. 39–111.Google Scholar
Blagoderov, V., Grimaldi, D.A., and Fraser., N.C., 2007, How time flies for flies: Diverse Diptera from the Triassic of Virginia and early radiation of the order: American Museum Novitates, v. 3572, p. 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, M., Cowie, J., and Taylor, M., 1994, Decision on the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary stratotype: Episodes, v. 17, p. 3–8.Google Scholar
Buatois, L.A., and Mángano, M.G., 1993, The ichnotaxonomic status of Plangtichnus and Treptichnus: Ichnos, v. 2, p. 217–224.Google Scholar
Buatois, L.A., and Mángano, M.G., 2011, Ichnology: Organism-Substrate Interactions in Space and Time, New York, Cambridge University Press, 358 p.Google Scholar
Buatois, L.A., Mángano, M.G., Maples, C.G., and Lanier, W.P., 1998, Ichnology of an upper Carboniferous fluvio-estuarine paleovalley: The Tonganoxie sandstone, Buildex quarry, eastern Kansas, USA: Journal of Paleontology, v. 72, p. 152–180.Google Scholar
Carbone, C., and Narbonne, G.M., 2014, When life got smart: The evolution of behavioral complexity through the Ediacaran and early Cambrian of NW Canada: Journal of Paleontology, v. 88, p. 309–330.Google Scholar
Collette, J.H., Getty, P.R., and Hagadorn, J.W., 2011, Insights into an Early Jurassic dinosaur habitat: Ichnofacies and enigmatic structures from the Portland Formation, Hoover Quarry, Massachusetts, U.S.A: Atlantic Geology, v. 47, p. 81–98.Google Scholar
Cornet, B., Traverse, A., and McDonald, N.G., 1973, Fossil spores, pollen, and fishes from Connecticut indicate Early Jurassic age for part of the Newark Group: Science, v. 182, p. 1243–1247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crimes, T.P., and Anderson, M.M., 1985, Trace fossils from late Precambrian–early Cambrian strata of southeastern Newfoundland (Canada): Temporal and environmental implications: Journal of Paleontology, v. 59, p. 310–343.Google Scholar
Dalman, S.G., and Lucas, S.G., 2015, Lower Jurassic arthropod resting trace from the Hartford Basin of Massachusetts, USA: Ichnos, v. 22, p. 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalman, S.G., and Weems, R.E., 2013, A new look at morphological variation in the ichnogenus Anomoepus, with special reference to material from the Lower Jurassic Newark Supergroup: Implications for ichnotaxonomy and ichnodiversity: Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, v. 54, p. 67–124.Google Scholar
Demicco, R.V., and Gierlowski-Kordesch, E., 1986, Facies sequences of a semi-arid closed basin: The Lower Jurassic East Berlin Formation of the Hartford Basin, New England, U.S.A: Sedimentology, v. 33, p. 107–118.Google Scholar
Drzewiecki, P.A., and Zuidema, S., 2007, Sequence stratigraphy of playa and perennial lake deposits, Jurassic East Berlin Formation, central Connecticut: Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences, v. 29, p. 49–68.Google Scholar
Dzik, J., 2005, Behavioral and anatomical unity of the earliest burrowing animals and the cause of the “Cambrian explosion”: Paleobiology, v. 31, p. 503–521.Google Scholar
Fitch, A., 1850, A historical, topographical, and agricultural survey of the County of Washington: Part 2–5:Transactions of the New York Agricultural Society, v. 9, p. 753–944.Google Scholar
Fraser, N.C., Grimaldi, D.A., Olsen, P.E., and Axsmith, B, 1996, A Triassic largerstätte from eastern North America: Nature, v. 380, p. 615–619.Google Scholar
Getty, P.R., 2005, Excavated and in situ dinosaur footprints from the Murray quarry (Early Jurassic, East Berlin Formation), Holyoke, Massachusetts, USA: Ichnos, v. 12, p. 163–178.Google Scholar
Getty, P.R., and Fox, N., 2015, An isolated Eubrontes giganteus trackway from the Gary Gaulin dinosaur track site (Early Jurassic, East Berlin Formation), Holyoke, Massachusetts: Northeastern Geoscience, v. 33, p. 12–17.Google Scholar
Gierlowski-Kordesch, E., 1991, Ichnology of an ephemeral lacustrine/alluvial plain system: Jurassic East Berlin Formation, Hartford Basin, USA: Ichnos, v. 1, p. 221–232.Google Scholar
Gierlowski-Kordesch, E., and Rust, B.R., 1994, The Jurassic East Berlin Formation, Hartford Basin, Newark Supergroup (Connecticut and Massachusetts): A saline lake-playa-alluvial plain system, in Renaut, R.W., and Last, W.M., eds., Sedimentology and Geochemistry of Modern and Ancient Saline Lakes, Tulsa, Society for Sedimentary Geology, p. 249–265.Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W., 1975, Trace fossils and problematica (2nd edition), in Teichert, C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part W. Miscellanea, suppl. 1, Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America, p. W117–W118.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, E., 1836, Ornithichnology. Description of the foot marks of birds (Ornithichnites) on new Red Sandstone in Massachusetts: American Journal of Science and Arts, v. 29, p. 307–340.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, E., 1858, Ichnology of New England. A Report on the Sandstone of the Connecticut Valley, Especially Its Fossil Footmarks, Boston, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, William White, 220 p.Google Scholar
Hubert, J.F., Reed, A.A., and Carrey, P.J., 1976, Paleogeography of the East Berlin Formation, Newark Group, Connecticut Valley: American Journal of Science, v. 276, p. 1183–1207.Google Scholar
Hubert, J.F., Feshbach-Meriney, P.E., and Smith, M.A., 1992, The Triassic–Jurassic Hartford Rift Basin, Connecticut and Massachusetts: Evolution, sandstone diagenesis, and hydrocarbon history: The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 76, p. 1710–1734.Google Scholar
Jensen, S., 1997, Trace Fossils from the lower Cambrian Mickwitzia Sandstone, South-Central Sweden: Fossils and Strata, no. 42, Oslo, Scandinavian University Press, 110 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, S., Saylor, B.Z., Gehling, J.G., and Germs, G.J.B., 2000, Complex trace fossils from the terminal Proterozoic of Namibia: Geology, v. 28, p. 143–146.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W., Krzemińska, E., and Papier, F., 1994, Grauvogelia arzvilleriana sp. n.—the oldest Diptera species (Lower/Middle Triassic of France): Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, v. 65, p. 267–274.Google Scholar
Landing, E., 1994, Precambrian–Cambrian boundary global stratotype ratified and a new perspective of Cambrian time: Geology, v. 22, p. 179–182.Google Scholar
MacNaughton, R.B., and Narbonne, G.M., 1999, Evolution and ecology of Neoproterozoic–lower Cambrian trace fossils, NW Canada: Palaios, v. 14, p. 97–115.Google Scholar
Maples, C.G, and Archer, A.W., 1987, Redescription of Early Pennsylvanian trace-fossil holotypes from the nonmarine Hindostan Whetstone Beds of Indiana: Journal of Paleontology, v. 61, p. 890–897.Google Scholar
Martin, A.J., 2009, Neoichnology of an Arctic fluvial point bar, North Slope, Alaska (USA): Geological Quarterly, v. 53, p. 383–396.Google Scholar
Metz, R., 1992, Trace fossils from the Lower Jurassic nonmarine Towaco Formation, New Jersey: Northeastern Geology, v. 14, p. 29–34.Google Scholar
Metz, R., 1996, Newark basin ichnology: The Late Triassic Perkasie Member of the Passaic Formation, Sanatoga, Pennsylvania: Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences, v. 18, p. 118–129.Google Scholar
Metz, R., 2007, Late Triassic invertebrate trace fossils from lacustrine shoreline deposits, Smith Clark quarry, Milford, New Jersey: Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences, v. 29, p. 1–14.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1889, North American Geology and Paleontology for the Use of Amateurs, Students, and Scientists, Cincinnati, Western Methodist Book Concern, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, M.F., and Smail, S.E., 1997, A semiquantitative field method for evaluating bioturbation on bedding planes: Palaios, v. 12, p. 391–396.Google Scholar
Muñiz Guinea, F., Mángano, M.G., Buatois, L.A., Podeniene, V., Gámez Vintaned, J.A., and Mayoral Alfaro, E., 2014, Compound biogenic structures resulting from ontogenetic variation: An example from a modern dipteran: Spanish Journal of Paleontology, v. 29, p. 83–94.Google Scholar
Narbonne, G.M., Myrow, P.M., Landing, E., and Anderson, M.M., 1987, A candidate stratotype for the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary, Fortune Head, Burin Peninsula, southeastern Newfoundland: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 24, p. 1277–1293.Google Scholar
Olsen, P.E., 1986, A 40-million-year lake record of early Mesozoic orbital climatic forcing: Science, v. 234, p. 842–848.Google Scholar
Olsen, P.E, 1997, Stratigraphic record of the early Mesozoic breakup of Pangea in the Laurasia-Gondwana rift system: Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 14, p. 185–200.Google Scholar
Olsen, P.E., and Rainforth, E.C., 2003, The Early Jurassic dinosaurian ichnogenus Anomoepus, in LeTourneau, P.M., and Olsen, P.E., eds., The Great Rift Valleys of Pangea in Eastern North America. Volume 2: Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, Paleontology, New York, Columbia University Press, p. 314–368.Google Scholar
Olsen, P.E., Smith, J.B., and McDonald, N.G., 1998, Type material of the type species of the classic theropod footprint genera Eubrontes, Anchisauripus, and Grallator (Early Jurassic, Hartford and Deerfield Basins, Connecticut and Massachusetts, U.S.A.): Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 18, p. 586–601.Google Scholar
Orłowski, S., and Żylińska, A., 1996, Non-arthropod burrows from the middle and late Cambrian of the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 41, p. 385–409.Google Scholar
Pacześna, J., 1986, Upper Vendian and lower Cambrian ichnocoenoses of Lublin region: Biuletyn Instytutu Geologicznego, v. 7, p. 31–47.Google Scholar
Palij, V.M., 1976, Remains of soft-bodied animals and trace fossils from the upper Precambrian and lower Cambrian of Podolia, in Paleontologiya i stratigraphiya verkhnego dokembriya I nizhnego kembriya yugo-zapada Vostochno-Europeiskoi platformy: Kiev, Naulova Dumka, p. 63–76 [in Ukranian].Google Scholar
Rindsberg, A.K., and Kopaska-Merkel, D.C., 2005, Treptichnus and Arenicolites from the Steven C. Minkin Paleozoic Footprint site (Langsettian, Alabama, USA), in Buta, R.J, Rindsberg, A.K., and Kopaska-Merkel, D.C., eds., Pennsylvanian Footprints in the Black Warrior Basin of Alabama, Alabama, Paleontological Society Monograph, No. 1, p. 121–141.Google Scholar
Schlirf, M., 2000, Upper Jurassic trace fossils from the Boulonnais (northern France): Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. 34, p. 145–213.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., 1955, Spuren und Fazies im Unterkambrium, in Schindewolf, O.H., and Seilacher, A, Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Kambriums in der Salt Range (Pakistan): Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur zu Mainz, mathematisch- naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abhandlungen, no. 10, p. 373–399.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A., and Hemleben, C., 1966, Beiträge zur sedimentation und Fossilführung des Hunsr ückschiefers 14. Spurenfauna und Bildungstiefe der Hunsrückschiefer (Unterdevon): Notizblatt des Hessischen Landesamtes fur Bodenforschung zu Wiesbaden, v. 94, p. 40–53.Google Scholar
Tessier, B., Archer, A.W., Lanier, W.P., and Feldman, H.R., 1995, Comparison of ancient tidal rhythmites (Carboniferous of Kansas and Indiana, USA) with modern analogues (the Bay of Mont-Saint-Michel, France): Special Publications International Association of Sedimentologists, v. 24, p. 259–271.Google Scholar
Uchman, A., 2005, Treptichnus-like traces made by insect larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae, Tipulidae), in Buta, R.J, Rindsberg, A.K., and Kopaska-Merkel, D.C., eds., Pennsylvanian Footprints in the Black Warrior Basin of Alabama, Alabama, Paleontological Society Monograph, No. 1, 143–146.Google Scholar
Uchman, A., Bromley, R.G., and Leszczyński, S., 1998, Ichnogenus Treptichnus in Eocene flysch, Carpathians, Poland: Taxonomy and preservation: Ichnos, v. 5, p. 269–275.Google Scholar
Vannier, J., Calandra, I., Gaillard, C., and Żylińska, A., 2010, Priapulid worms: Pioneer horizontal burrowers at the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary: Geology, v. 38, p. 711–714.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.P., et al., 2012, Deep-water incised valley deposits at the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary in southern Namibia contain abundant Treptichnus pedum: Palaios, v. 27, p. 252–273.Google Scholar