Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T07:35:59.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The type species of Lingulella (Cambrian Brachiopoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Mark D. Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Wales Cardiff, PO Box 914, Cardiff CF1 3YE, Wales, UK
Michael G. Bassett
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, National Museum of Wales, Cardiff CF1 3NP, Wales, UK
Lesley Cherns
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Wales Cardiff, PO Box 914, Cardiff CF1 3YE, Wales, UK

Abstract

The poorly known type species of Lingulella, Lingula davisii M'Coy, 1851b, is redefined from new material collected from the type locality and horizon (Upper Cambrian, North Wales). Lingulella is similar to Obolus and to Ungula in its musculature mantle canals, and pseudointerareas, but has a thinner shell and irregular pits over its internal surface, concentrated in the visceral areas. A dissolution method that can facilitate the study of lingulate brachiopods preserved in clastic lithologies is described, and its wider adoption is recommended in order to reveal diagnostic morphological characters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, P. M., Jackson, A. A., and Rushton, A. W. A. 1981. The stratigraphy of the Mawddach Group in the Cambrian succession of North Wales. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 43:295329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, M. G., Holmer, L. E., Popov, L. E., and Laurie, J. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis and classification of the Brachiopoda—reply and comments. Lethaia, 26:385386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1939. Muscle systems of some inarticulate brachiopods. Geological Magazine, 76:434444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, C. 1877. On a new area of Upper Cambrian rocks in South Shropshire, with a description of a new fauna. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 33:652672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1911. The name Glossina . Nautilus, 25:96.Google Scholar
Cocks, L. R. M. 1978. A review of British Lower Palaeozoic brachiopods, including a synoptic revision of Davidson's monograph. Palaeontographical Society (Monograph), 256 p. (publication No. 549, issued as part of Volume 131 for 1977).Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W., and Rushton, A. W. A. 1992. Cambrian and early Tremadoc rocks of the Llangynog Inlier, Dyfed, South Wales. Geological Magazine, 129:543552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, G. B., and Williams, A. 1983. Epithelial moulds on the shells of the early Palaeozoic brachiopod Lingulella . Lethaia, 16:111118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, M. L. K. 1968. The Tremadoc rocks of the Tortworth Inlier, Gloucestershire. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 79:349362, pls. 8-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1870. A revision of the Terebratulidae and Lingulidae. American Journal of Conchology, 6:88168, pls. 6-8.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1866. A monograph of the British fossil Brachiopoda. Volume III, Part VII, Number I. The Silurian Brachiopoda. Palaeontographical Society (Monograph), 1-88, pls. 1-12. (publication No. 84, issued as part of Volume 19 for 1865).Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1868. On the earliest forms of Brachiopoda hitherto discovered in the British Palaeozoic rocks. Geological Magazine, (1), 5:303316, pls. 15-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Eichwald, E. 1829. Zoologia specialis, quam expositis animalibus tum vivis, tum fossilibus potissium Rossiae in universum et Poloniae in specie, etc. Volume 1, Vilnae, 314 p, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Goryansky, V. Yu. 1969. Bezzamkovye brakhiopody kembrijskikh i ordovikskikh otlozhenii severo-zapada Russko platformy. (Inarticulate brachiopods of the Cambrian and Ordovician deposits of the north-west Russian Platform). Ministerstvo Geologii RSFSR, Severo-Zapadnoe Territorial'noe Geologicheskoe Upravlenie, 6:1173, pls 1-21. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Goryansky, V. Yu., and Popov, L. E. 1985. Morfologiya, sistematicheskoye polozheniye i proiskhozhdeniye bezzamkovykh brakhiopod s karbonatnoy rakovinoy. (The morphology, systematic position, and origin of inarticulate brachiopods with carbonate shells). Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 1985(3):313. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Goryansky, V. Yu., and Popov, L. E. 1986. On the origin and systematic position of the calcareous-shelled inarticulate brachiopods. Lethaia, 19:233240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Contributions to paleontology. 16th Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the State of New York on the condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History. Albany, 3-226, pls. 1-11.Google Scholar
Havlícek, V. 1982. Lingulacea, Paterinacea, and Siphonotretacea (Brachiopoda) in the Lower Ordovician sequence of Bohemia. Sborník Geologickýck Ved. Praha, (Paleontologie), 25:982.Google Scholar
Holmer, L. E., Popov, L. E., Bassett, M. G., and Laurie, J. 1995. Phylogenetic analysis and ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. Palaeontology, 38:713741.Google Scholar
Howells, M. F., and Smith, M. 1997. Geology of the country around Snowdon. Memoir of the British Geological Survey for 1:50,000 Geological Sheet 119 (England and Wales). 104 p.Google Scholar
Jeppsson, L., Fredholm, D., and Mattiasson, B. 1985. Acetic acid and phosphatic fossils—a warning. Journal of Paleontology, 59:952956.Google Scholar
Jeremejew, P. 1856. Geognostische Beobachtungen an den Ufern des Wolchow. Russich-Kaiserliche Mineralogische Gesellschaft Verhandlungen 1855-1856, 6384.Google Scholar
King, W. 1846. Remarks on certain genera belonging to the class Palliobranchiata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 18:2642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, F. F., and Rowell, A. J. 1975. Distribution and systematics of the inarticulate brachiopods of the Ordovician carbonate mud mound of Meiklejohn Peak, Nevada. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Article 61, 174, pls. 1-12.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1899. Preliminary notice of the Etcheminian fauna of Cape Breton. Bulletin of the New Brunswick Natural History Society, 4:198208, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Matthew, S. C. 1973. Notes on open nomenclature and on synonymy lists. Palaeontology, 16:713719.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1846. A synopsis of the Silurian fossils of Ireland collected from the several districts by Richard Griffith, F.G.S. Dublin, 72 p., 5 pls.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1851a. On some new Silurian Mollusca. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 2nd Series, 7:4563.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1851b. On some new Cambro-Silurian fossils. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 2nd Series, 8:387409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1852. In Sedgwick, A. and McCoy, F., A synopsis of the classification of the British Palaeozoic rocks with a systematic description of the British Palaeozoic fossils in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge. John W. Parker and Son, West Strand, London; Deighton, Bell & Co., and Macmillan & Co., Cambridge, p. 1661, pls. 1A-L, 2A-D, 3A-K.Google Scholar
Menke, C. T. 1828. Synopsis methodica molluscorum generum omnium et specierum earum quae in Museo Menkeano adservantur. Pyrmonti, 91 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. F. 1988. A review of British trilobites, including a synoptic revision of Salter's monograph. Palaeontographical Society (Monograph) 1-316. (publication No. 574, issued as part of Volume 140 for 1986).Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1854. Siluria. The history of the oldest known rocks containing organic remains, with a brief sketch of the distribution of gold over the Earth. John Murray, London, xv [+ 1] + 523 p., 37 pls.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1859. Siluria. The history of the oldest fossiliferous rocks and their foundations; with a brief sketch of the distribution of gold over the Earth. Second edition [as Third Edition, (Including “The Silurian System”)]. John Murray, London, xix [+ 1] + 592 p., 41 pls.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1862. [Presidential Address to Geology Section]. Report of 31st Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science; Manchester 1861, 95108.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1867. Siluria. A history of the oldest rocks in the British Isles and other countries; with sketches of the origin and distribution of native gold, the general succession of geological formations, and changes of the Earth's surface. Third edition [as Fourth Edition, Including “The Silurian System”]. John Murray, London, xvii [+ 1] + 566 p., 41 pls.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1872. Siluria. A history of the oldest rocks in the British Isles and other countries; with sketches of the origin and distribution of native gold, the general succession of geological formations, and changes of the Earth's surface. Fourth edition [as Fifth Edition]. John Murray, London, xvii [+ 1] + 566 p.Google Scholar
Pander, C. H. 1830. Beiträge zur Geognosie des Russischen Reiches. St. Petersburg, xx + 165 p.Google Scholar
Popov, L. E., Bassett, M. G., Holmer, L. E., and Laurie, J. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of higher taxa of Brachiopoda. Lethaia, 26:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, L. E., and Holmer, L. E. 1994. Cambrian-Ordovician lingulate brachiopods from Scandinavia, Kazakhstan, and South Ural Mountains. Fossils and Strata, 35:1156.Google Scholar
Popov, L. E., and Khazonovich, K. K., 1989. Lingulaty (bezzamkovye brakhiopodi c fosfatnokaltsievoi rakovinoi). (Lingulata (inarticulate brachiopods with phosphatocalcitic shells)). In Nikitin, I. F. (ed.), Opornye razrezi i stratigrafiya Kembro-Ordoviksoi fosforitonosnoi obolovoi tolshchi na severo-zapade Russkoi platformy. Akad. Nauk SSSR: Ministerstvo Geologii SSSR. Mezhvedomstvennyi Stratigraficheskii Komitet SSSR. Nauka, Leningrad [St Petersburg]. Trudy, 18:96-136, pls. 1-12. (In Russian)Google Scholar
Pratt, W. T., Woodhall, D. G., and Howells, M. F. 1995. Geology of the country around Cadair Idris. Memoir of the British Geological Survey for 1:50,000 Geological Sheet 149 (England and Wales). 111 p.Google Scholar
Puura, I. 1996. Cambrian-Ordovician lingulate brachiopods from Estonia and northwestern Russia. 136 p. In Puura, I., Lingulate brachiopods and biostratigraphy of the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary beds in Baltoscandia. Doctoral thesis presented to the Department of Historical Geology & Palaeontology, Institute of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, 196 p.Google Scholar
Ramsay, A. C. 1866. The geology of North Wales. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain and of the Museum of Practical Geology, 3:iviii, 1-381, pls. 1-28.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. J. 1965. Inarticulata, p. H260H296. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Brachiopoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1979. The real M'Coy. Lethaia, 12:226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A. 1992. Brachiopoda. In R. A. Fortey and R. M. Owens, The Habberley Formation: youngest Tremadoc in the Welsh Borderland. Geological Magazine, 129:563565.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A., and Bassett, M. G. 1982. Brachiopoda. In Owens, R. M., Fortey, R. A., Cope, J. C. W., Rushton, A. W. A., and Bassett, M. G., Tremadoc faunas from the Carmarthen district, South Wales. Geological Magazine, 119:1927.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1866. On the fossils of North Wales, p. 239381, pls. 1-26. In Ramsay, A. C., The geology of North Wales. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain and of the Museum of Practical Geology, 3.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1873. A catalogue of the collection of Cambrian and Silurian fossils contained in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge. University Press, Cambridge, xlviii + 204 p.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1839. Shells of the Ludlow and Wenlock Formations, or Upper Silurian rocks; Shells of the Lower Silurian rocks, p. 608644, pls. 5-6,8,12-13,19-21. In Murchison, R. I., The Silurian System founded on geological researches in the counties of Salop, Hereford, Radnor, Montgomery, Caermarthen, Brecon, Pembroke, Monmouth, Gloucester, Worcester, and Stafford; with descriptions of the coal-fields and overlying formations. Part 2. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J., and Bulman, O. M. B. 1927. The Shineton Shales of the Wrekin district: with notes on their development in other parts of Shropshire and Herefordshire. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 83:96146, pls. 3-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waagen, W. H. 1885. Salt Range fossils, Part 4 (2) Brachiopoda: Palaeontologia Indica Memoirs, Series 13, 1, Part 5:729770, pls. 82-86.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1898. Cambrian Brachiopoda: Obolus and Lingulella, with description of new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 21:385420, pls. 26-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Cambrian Brachiopoda. Monographs of the United States Geological Survey, 51, Part I (Text):1872; Part II (Plates): 1-363, pls. 1-104. Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1974. Ordovician Brachiopoda from the Shelve district, Shropshire. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, Supplement 11:1163, pls. 1-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., Carlson, S. J., Brunton, C. H. C., Holmer, L. E., and Popov, L. 1996. A supra-ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 351:11711193.Google Scholar