Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T23:00:44.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decision making by pension fund trustees in the face of demographic and economic shocks: a vignette study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

HENDRIK P. VAN DALEN*
Affiliation:
Tilburg School of Economics and Management and CentER, Tilburg University Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI), The Hague
KÈNE HENKENS
Affiliation:
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI), The Hague Department of Sociology and Netspar, Tilburg University
KEES KOEDIJK
Affiliation:
Tilburg School of Economics and Management and CentER, Tilburg University Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London
ALFRED SLAGER
Affiliation:
Tilburg School of Economics and Management, TiasNimbas Business School and CentER, Tilburg University
*

Abstract

How do pension fund trustees deal with demographic and economic shocks? We examine this issue by using a vignette study among pension fund trustees in the Netherlands. Trustees show asymmetric reactions to shocks in the level of reserves of pension funds. Pension premiums are upwardly flexible but trustees are reluctant to decrease premiums. Asymmetries are also revealed by choices regarding the inflation indexation of benefits and changing real (defined) benefits. Asymmetry is not visible in the policy responses to demographic shocks: increases in life expectancy are reflected by taking structural measures for a defined benefit contract: raising pension premiums and the pension age. Furthermore, trustees allow their choices to be affected by the forces of social comparison: the reserve position of their fund compared to the position of other funds has a significant influence in choosing pension fund policy instruments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Comments by Gordon Clark and two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Alessie, R. and Kapteyn, A. (2001) Savings and pensions in the Netherlands. Research in Economics, 55: 6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambachtsheer, K. P. (2007) Pension Revolution – A Solution to the Pension Crisis. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ammann, M. and Zingg, A. (2010) Performance and governance of Swiss pension funds. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 9: 95–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, N. and Diamond, P. (2006) The economics of pensions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22: 1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R. H. (2007) Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21: 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonenkamp, J. and Ter Rele, H. (2009) Raising statutory retirement age and coverage ratios of pension funds. CPB Memorandum 1/2009/01, The Hague.Google Scholar
Buetler, M., Huguenin, O. and Teppa, F. (2005) Why forcing people to save for retirement may backfire. CESifo Working Paper, No. 1458, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F. and Malmendier, U. (2007) Behavioral economics of organizations. Working Paper, Stanford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. L., Caerlewy-Smith, E., and Marshall, J. C. (2006) Pension fund trustee competence: Decision making in problems relevant to investment practice. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 5: 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. L., Caerlewy-Smith, E., and Marshall, J. C. (2007) The consistency of UK pension fund decision-making. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 6: 6786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. L. and Urwin, R. (2008) Making pension boards work: The critical role of leadership. Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 1: 3845.Google Scholar
Coval, J. D. and Moskowitz, T. J. (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance, LIV: 20452073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronqvist, H. and Thaler, R. H. (2004) Design choices in privatized social-security systems: Learning from the Swedish experience. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 94: 424428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M. and Thaler, R. H. (1995) Financial decision-making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective. In Jarrow, R. (ed.), Handbooks in Organization Research and Management Science, Volume 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 385410.Google Scholar
De Nederlandsche Bank (2008) Macroeconomic Statistics Pension Funds. Amsterdam: Dutch Central Bank.Google Scholar
Ganong, L. H. and Coleman, M. (2006) Multiple segment factorial vignette designs. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60: 455468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D. S. and Weber, R. (2007) Demography and investment behavior of pension funds: evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 6: 313337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., and Stein, J. C. (2005) The neighbor's portfolio: Word-of-mouth effects in the holdings and trades of money managers. Journal of Finance, LX: 28012824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., and van Soest, A. (2007) Vignettes and self-reports of work disability in the United States and the Netherlands. American Economic Review, 97: 462473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, A. W., Repin, D. V., and Steenbarger, B. N. (2005) Fear and greed in financial markets: A clinical study of day-traders. American Economic Review, 95: 352359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2008) Pension Markets in Focus. December 2008, Issue 5, Paris.Google Scholar
Olsen, R. A. (1997) Desirability bias among professional investment managers: some evidence from experts. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10: 6572.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, P. H. and Anderson, A. B. (1982) The factorial survey approach. An introduction. In Rossi, P. H. and Nock, S. L. (eds), Measuring Social Judgments. The Factorial Survey Approach (Volumes 15–67). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. (2002) Bubbles, human judgement, and expert opinion. Financial Analyst Journal, 58: 1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, F. and Yermo, J. (2008) Pension fund governance: Challenges and potential solutions. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 18, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (ed.) ( 2005) Advances in Behavioral Finance, Volume II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torngren, G. and Montgomery, H. (2004) Worse than chance? Performance and confidence among professionals and laypeople in the stock market. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5, 148153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Beek, K., van Praag, B. M. S., and Koopmans, C. C. (1997) Shopping at the labour market: a real tale of fiction. European Economic Review, 41: 295317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dalen, H. P., Henkens, K., and Hershey, D. A. (2010) Perceptions and expectations of pension savings adequacy: a comparative study of Dutch and American workers. Ageing and Society, 30: 731754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, M. (2004) A Guide to Modern Econometrics, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wallander, L. (2009) 25 Years of factorial surveys in sociology: a review. Social Science Research, 38: 505520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar