Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5bf98f6d76-xlldj Total loading time: 0.249 Render date: 2021-04-21T00:13:27.359Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

How will persistent low expected returns shape household economic behavior?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Vanya Horneff
Affiliation:
Finance Department, Goethe University, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 3 (Uni-PF. H 23), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Raimond Maurer
Affiliation:
Finance Department, Goethe University, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 3 (Uni-PF. H 23), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Olivia S. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Locust Walk, 3000 SH-DH, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Corresponding

Abstract

Many believe that global capital markets will generate lower returns in the future versus the past. We examine how persistently lower real returns will reshape work, retirement, saving, and investment behavior of older persons using a calibrated dynamic life cycle model. In a low return regime, workers build up less wealth in their tax-qualified 401(k) accounts versus the past, claim social security benefits later, and work more. Moreover, the better-educated are more sensitive to real interest rate changes, while the least-educated alter their behavior less. Interestingly, the distribution of wealth is more uniform in periods of persistent low expected returns.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Arias, E (2010) United States Life Tables, 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports 58(10), US National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
Brown, JR (2001) Private pensions, mortality risk, and the decision to annuitize. Journal of Public Economics 82(1), 2962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, K, Giandrea, M and Quinn, J (2015). Evolving patterns of work and retirement. In George, L and Ferraro, K (eds). The Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 8th Edn. London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 271291.Google Scholar
Chai, J, Horneff, W, Maurer, R and Mitchell, OS (2011) Optimal portfolio choice over the life cycle with flexible work, endogenous retirement, and lifetime payouts. Review of Finance 15, 875907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocco, J, Gomes, F and Maenhout, P (2005) Consumption and portfolio choice over the life cycle. Review of Financial Studies 18, 491533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) (2017). What Does Consistent Participation in 401(k) Plans Generate? Changes in 401(k) Plan Account Balances, 2010–2015. EBRI Issue BRIEF No. 439, Oct. 2017.Google Scholar
Gomes, F and Michaelides, A (2005) Optimal life-cycle asset allocation: understanding the empirical evidence. Journal of Finance 60(2): 869904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, FJ, Kotlikoff, LJ and Viceira, LM (2008) Optimal life-cycle investing with flexible labor supply: a welfare analysis of life-cycle funds. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 98, 297303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, F, Michaelides, A and Polkovnichenko, V (2009) Optimal savings with taxable and tax-deferred accounts. Review of Economic Dynamics 12, 718735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horneff, V, Maurer, R, Mitchell, OS and Rogalla, R (2015) Optimal life cycle portfolio choice with variable annuities offering liquidity and investment downside protection. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 63, 91107.Google Scholar
Horneff, V, Maurer, R and Mitchell, OS (2016) Putting the Pension Back in 401(k) Plans: Optimal versus Default Longevity Income Annuities. NBER Working Paper 22717.Google Scholar
Horneff, V, Maurer, R and Mitchell, OS (2018) How persistent low returns alter optimal life cycle saving, investment, and retirement behavior. In Clark, R, Maurer, R and Mitchell, OS (eds). How Persistent Low Returns Alter Optimal Life Cycle Saving, Investment, and Retirement Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubener, A, Maurer, R and Mitchell, OS (2016) How family status and social security claiming options shape optimal life cycle portfolios. Review of Financial Studies 29, 937978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (2012 a). Form 1040 (Tax Tables): Tax Tables and Tax Rate Schedules. Downloaded 03/12/2013. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040tt.pdfGoogle Scholar
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (2012 b). Retirement Plan and IRA Required Minimum Distributions FAQs. https://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Retirement-Plans-FAQs-regarding-Required-Minimum-Distributions.Google Scholar
Lewin, J (2016) Swiss Bond Yields Now Negative Out to 50 Years. FT.com, July 5. https://www.ft.com/content/2ae4237a-2d3e-33dd-b9e0-120c4a93a29c.Google Scholar
Love, DA (2007) What can life-cycle models tell Us about 401(k) contributions and participation? Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 6, 147185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, DA (2010) The effects of marital Status and children on savings and portfolio choice. Review of Financial Studies 23, 385432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center of Educational Statistics (2012) Historical Summary of Faculty, Students, Degrees, and Finances in Degree-granting Institituions: Selected Years, 1869–70 through 2005–06. https://nces.ed.gov (accessed 24 April 2012).Google Scholar
Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2012) The Decision to Delay Social Security Benefits: Theory and Evidence, NBER Working Paper 17866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2014) Does it pay to delay social security? Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 13, 121144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slok, T (2018) $8trn Bubble Still There. Deutsche Bank Research Presentation. June.Google Scholar
US Social Security Administration (2015) Annual Statistical Supplement to the Social Security Bulletin, 2015 (Table 6.B 5).Google Scholar
US Social Security Administration (US SSA) (nd). Fact Sheet: Benefit Formula Bend Points. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/bendpoints.html.Google Scholar
Zeng, M (2017) US 10-Year Note Yield Hits Low for the Month. WallStreetJournal.com. March 31. https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-bonds-rebound-from-earlier-losses-1490108750?tesla=y.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 21
Total number of PDF views: 144 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 27th December 2018 - 21st April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How will persistent low expected returns shape household economic behavior?
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

How will persistent low expected returns shape household economic behavior?
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

How will persistent low expected returns shape household economic behavior?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *