Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:28:37.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The power of working longer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

Gila Bronshtein
Affiliation:
Cornerstone Research, Menlo Park, California, USA
Jason Scott
Affiliation:
JS Retirement Consulting, Los Altos, California, USA
John B. Shoven
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Sita Nataraj Slavov*
Affiliation:
Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, 3351 Fairfax Drive MS3B1, Arlington, Virginia, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: sslavov@gmu.edu

Abstract

This paper compares the relative strengths of working longer vs. saving more in terms of increasing a household's affordable, sustainable standard of living in retirement. Both stylized households and actual households from the Health and Retirement Study are examined. We assume that workers commence Social Security benefits when they retire. The basic result is that delaying retirement by 3–6 months has the same impact on the retirement standard of living as saving an additional one-percentage point of labor earnings for 30 years. The relative power of saving more is even lower if the decision to increase saving is made later in the work life. For instance, increasing retirement saving by one percentage point 10 years before retirement has the same impact on the sustainable retirement standard of living as working between 1 and 2 months longer. The calculations of the relative power of working longer and saving more are done for a wide range of realized rates of returns on saving, for households with different income levels, and for singles as well as married couples. The results are quite invariant to these circumstances.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auerbach, AJ, Kotlikoff, LJ, Koehler, DK and Yu, M (2016) Is Uncle Sam inducing the elderly to retire?, NBER WP# 22770, October 2016.Google Scholar
Blau, DM (2008) Retirement and consumption in a life cycle model. Journal of Labor Economics 26, 3571.Google Scholar
Bronshtein, G, Scott, J, Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2016) Leaving big money on the table: arbitrage opportunities in delaying social security (working paper no. 22853). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w22853.Google Scholar
Coile, C, Diamond, P, Gruber, J and Jousten, A (2002) Delays in claiming social security benefits. Journal of Public Economics 84, 357385.Google Scholar
Friedman, M (1957) A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Available at http://papers.nber.org/books/frie57-1.Google Scholar
Goda, GS, Ramnath, S, Shoven, S and Slavov, SN (2018) The financial feasibility of delaying social security: evidence from administrative tax data. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 17, 419436.Google Scholar
Gustman, AL and Steinmeier, T (2008) How changes in social security affect recent retirement trends (working paper no. 14105). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w14105.Google Scholar
Gustman, AL and Steinmeier, TL (1986) A structural retirement model. Econometrica 54, 555584.Google Scholar
Gustman, AL and Steinmeier, TL (2015) Effects of social security policies on benefit claiming, retirement and saving. Journal of Public Economics 129, 5162.Google Scholar
Haan, P and Prowse, V (2014) Longevity, life-cycle behavior and pension reform. Journal of Econometrics, 178, Part 3, 582601.Google Scholar
Mahaney, J and Carlson, P (2007) Rethinking social security claiming in a 401(k) World (working paper no. 2007–18). Pension Research Council. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Mahaney/publication/228703615_Rethinking_Social_Security_Claiming_in_a_401k_World/links/5728cf7108aef5d48d2c8991.pdf.Google Scholar
Meyer, W and Reichenstein, W (2010) Social security: when to start benefits and how to minimize longevity risk. Journal of Financial Planning 23, 4959.Google Scholar
Mitchell, OS, Poterba, JM, Warshawsky, MJ and Brown, JR (1999) New evidence on the money's worth of individual annuities. American Economic Review 89, 12991318.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F (1966) The life cycle hypothesis of saving, the demand for wealth and the supply of capital. Social Research 33, 160217.Google Scholar
Munnell, A and Soto, M (2005) Why do women claim social security benefits so early? (issue brief no. 35). Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Available at http://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2005/10/ib_35_508c.pdf.Google Scholar
Sass, SA, Sun, W and Webb, A (2007) Why do married men claim social security benefits so early? Ignorance or caddishness? (SSRN Scholarly paper no. ID 1297440). Social Science Research Network. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1297440.Google Scholar
Sass, SA, Sun, W and Webb, A (2013) Social security claiming decision of married men and widow poverty. Economics Letters 119, 2023.Google Scholar
Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2014 a) Does it pay to delay social security? Journal of Pension Economics Finance 13, 121144.Google Scholar
Shoven, JB and Slavov, SN (2014 b) Recent changes in the gains from delaying social security. Journal of Financial Planning 27, 3241.Google Scholar
Shoven, JB, Slavov, SN and Wise, DA (2017) Social security claiming decisions: survey evidence (working paper no. 23829). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w23729.Google Scholar
Song, J and Manchester, J (2007) New evidence on earnings and benefit claims following changes in the retirement earnings test in 2000. Journal of Public Economics 91, 669700.Google Scholar
Yaari, ME (1965) Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies 32, 137150.Google Scholar