Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5bf98f6d76-fsmsh Total loading time: 0.412 Render date: 2021-04-21T04:01:51.061Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Supplemental plan offerings and retirement saving choices: an analysis of North Carolina school districts*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2016

ROBERT L. CLARK
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics and Management, North Carolina State University and Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research (e-mail: robert_clark@ncsu.edu)
EMMA HANSON
Affiliation:
Doctoral Candidate, Economics, North Carolina State University and Policy Researcher, North Carolina Department of State Treasurer (e-mail: evhanson@ncsu.edu)
MELINDA SANDLER MORRILL
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, North Carolina State University (e-mail: melinda_morrill@ncsu.edu)
ADITI PATHAK
Affiliation:
Doctoral Student, Economics, North Carolina State University (e-mail: aspathak@ncsu.edu)

Abstract

Unlike private sector employers, public school districts generally offer more than one type of supplemental retirement savings plan and allow multiple vendors to offer products. Using individual-level payroll data from over half of the public school districts in North Carolina coupled with data from an employer survey, this study examines how inter-district differences in supplemental plan administration are related to participation in these savings vehicles. We find wide variation in total participation rates and in 403(b) plan participation rates in particular, even among this population of public-sector workers with the same defined benefit pension plan, health plan, and retiree health coverage. Individual and district characteristics explain some, but not all, of the variation observed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Aldeman, C. and Rotherham, A. (2014) Friends without Benefits: How States Systematically Shortchange Teachers’ Retirement and Threaten Their Retirement Security. Available online at http://www.teacherpensions.org/sites/default/files/Bellwether_PensionPaper_070814_Web.pdf Google Scholar
Agnew, J. R. and Szykman, L. R. (2005) Asset allocation and information overload: the influence of information display, asset choice, and investor experience. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(2): 5770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D., and Madrian, B. (2011) Behavior economics perspectives on public sector pension plans. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(2): 315336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J., Liang, N., and Weisbenner, S. (2007) Individual account investment options and portfolio choice: behavioral lessons from 401(k) plans. Journal of Public Economics, 91(10): 19922013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chingos, M. M. and West, M. R. (2015) Which teachers choose a defined contribution pension plan? Evidence from the Florida retirement system. Education Finance and Policy, 10(2): 193222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B., and Metrick, A. (2002) Defined contribution pensions: plan rules, participation decisions, and the path of least resistance. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/tax-policy-and-economy, Volume 16.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Laibson, D., and Madrian, B. (2004) Plan design and 401(k) savings outcomes. National Tax Journal, 57: 275298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J., Laibson, D., and Madrian, B. (2009) Reducing the complexity costs of 401(k) participation: the case of quick enrollment. In Wise, D. A. (ed.), Developments in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 5782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J., Laibson, D., and Madrian, B. (2010) Why does the law of one price fail? An experiment on index mutual funds. Review of Financial Studies, 23(4): 14051432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, R. and Hanson, E. (2013) 403(b) Plans for Public School Teachers: How They Are Monitored and Regulated In Each State? TIAA-CREF Research Dialogue, Issue No. 107. Available online at https://www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org/public/pdf/institute/research/dialogue/107b.pdf Google Scholar
Clark, R. and Morrill, M. (2010) Retiree Health Plans in the Public Sector: Is There a Funding Crisis?. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. and Richardson, D. (2010) Who's Watching the Door? How Controlling Provider Access Can Improve K-12 Teacher Retirement Outcomes. TIAA-CREF Research Dialogue. Available online at https://www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org/public/institute/research/dialogue/rd_98.html Google Scholar
Clark, R., Craig, L., and Sabelhaus, J. (2011) State and Local Retirement Plans in the United States. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R., Hanson, E., Morrill, M., and Pathak, A. (2015) Introduction of State Managed 403(b) Plan in North Carolina: Phase I Research Methods and Data. North Carolina State University, Unpublished Manuscript, June 2015. Available online at https://sites.google.com/a/ncsu.edu/msmorrill/files/Phase_I_Research_Methods_and_Data.pdf (Accessed August 2015).Google Scholar
Davis, D., Miller, G., and Miller, J. (2011) PROTECTING PARTICIPATION: The Impact of Reduced Choice on Participation by School District Employees in 403(b) Plans. ASPPA Pension Education and Research Foundation. Available online at http://www.ntsa-net.org/Portals/4/PERF_ResearchProtectingParticipation2011.pdf Google Scholar
Duflo, E. and Saez, E. (2002) Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: the influence of colleagues’ choices. Journal of Public Economics, 85: 121148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G., Iyengar, S. and Jiang, W. (2007) Defined contribution pension plans: determinants of participation and contributions rates. Journal of Financial Services Research, 31(1): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: an organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3): 499534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S. and Kamenica, E. (2010) Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7–8): 530539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Huberman, G., and Jiang, W. (2004). How much choice is too much?: Contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. In Mitchell, O. and Utkus, S. (eds), Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 8395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, J. G. (2013) Why are retirement benefits in the United States so complicated?: An overview of how we got here. Compensation and Benefits Review, 45: 3439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankford, K. (2012) Make the Most of a 403(b) Retirement Plan. Kiplinger's Personal Finance, accessible at: http://m.kiplinger.com/article/retirement/T047-C000-S002-make-the-most-of-a-403-b-retirement-plan.html, [Accessed 18 December 2015].Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2009) How ordinary consumers make complex economic decisions: financial literacy and retirement readiness. NBER Working Paper #15350, September 2009.Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2014) The economic importance of financial literacy: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1): 544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madrian, B. and Shea, D. F. (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1149–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercado, D. (2014) Surrender fees haunt legacy 403(b) plans. Investment News, July 23. Available online at http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20140723/FREE/140729974/surrender-fees-haunt-legacy-403-b-plans (Accessed 13 March 2015).Google Scholar
Scism, L. (2012) Teachers’ 403(b) plans see big changes. The Wall Street Journal, January 9. Available online at http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204190504577039912581388668 (Accessed 13 March 2015) Google Scholar
SigRist, K. and Brown, S. (2000) Design considerations for large public sector defined contribution plans. Financial Services Review, 9: 197218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. A. (2003) Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3): 665–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanguard Center for Retirement Research (2003) Can There Be Too Much Choice in a Retirement Saving Plans. Available online at http://403bwise.com/pdf/vcrr_choice_study.pdf Google Scholar

Clark supplementary material

Online Appendix

File 90 KB

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Linked content

Please note a has been issued for this article.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Supplemental plan offerings and retirement saving choices: an analysis of North Carolina school districts*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Supplemental plan offerings and retirement saving choices: an analysis of North Carolina school districts*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Supplemental plan offerings and retirement saving choices: an analysis of North Carolina school districts*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *