Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:54:03.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cash balance pension plan conversions and the new economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2004

JULIA LYNN CORONADO
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Washington, DC 20551 (e-mail: jcoronado@frb.gov)
PHILIP C. COPELAND
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis, Missouri 63130

Abstract

Many firms that sponsor traditional defined benefit pensions have converted these plans to cash balance plans in the last en years. Cash balance plans in the last ten years combine features of defined benefit and defined contribution plans, and yet their introduction has proven considerably more controversial than has the increasing popularity of defined contribution plans. The goal of this study is to estimate a hierarchy of the influences on the decision of a firm to convert its traditional defined benefit pension plan to a cash balance plan. Our results indicate that cash balance conversions have been undertaken in competitive industries with tight labor markets and thus can be viewed at least in part as a response to better compensate a more mobile labor force. Indeed, many firms appear to increase their pension liabilities through such conversions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Karen Dynan, Andreas Lehnert, Peter Orszag, and Karen Pence, staff members at the IRS and Treasury, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Board or its staff.